1
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research and Teaching

Adding Necessary Rigor to Engineering Pedagogical Change: Instructional Innovation Versus Research-Informed Counter-Resistance

References

  • Beddoes, K., & Borrego, M. (2011). Feminist theory in three engineering education journals: 1995-2008. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 281–303.
  • Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T (2009). Addressing the needs of underprepared students in higher education. Journal of Human Resources, 44(3), 736–771.
  • Borrego, M. (2007). Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 5–18.
  • Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207.
  • Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252.
  • Cobb, P. (1997). Accounting for mathematical learning in the social context of the classroom. LEducazione Mathematica 5: 65-81 (part 61), 123-142 (part 122).
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  • Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78(10), 1056–1063.
  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
  • Dykstra, D. (2002). Why teach kinematics? An examination of the teaching of kinematics and force. Proceedings of the 2004 American Physical Society Northwest Meeting Conference. American Institute of Physics. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002APS..NWS.H2001D
  • Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage.
  • Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. EducationalResearch, 38(1), 47–65.
  • Felder, R. M. (1991). It goes without saying. Chemical Engineering Education, 25(3), 132–133.
  • Felder, R. M. (2006). Teaching engineering in the 21st century with a 12th century teaching model: How bright is this? Chemical Engineering Education, 40(2), 110–113.
  • Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Prince, M. J. (2011). Engineering instructional development: Programs, best practices and recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89–122.
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23), 8410–8415.
  • Froyd, J. E., & Lohmann, J. R. (2014). Chronological and ontological development of engineering education as a field of scientific inquiry. In A. John & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 10013–2473). Cambridge University Press.
  • Hammersley, M. (1993). On the teacher as researcher. Educational Action Research, 1(3), 425–445.
  • Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics, 76(1), 79–91.
  • House of Pain. (1992). Jump around [Song]. On House of pain [Album]. Tommy Boy Records.
  • Jawitz, J., & Case, J. (2002). Women in engineering: Beyond the stats. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(4), 390–391.
  • Johnson, C. C. (2006). Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 150–161.
  • John, A., & Olds, B. M. (2014). Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2002). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Y. Zou & E. T. Trueba (Eds.), Ethnography and schools: Qualitative approaches to the study of education. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Lee, Y.H. (2018). Fostering students’ content knowledge and argumentation skills in an interactive classroom discourse with technology-enhanced active learning instruction [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Martorell, P., & McFarlin, I. J. (2011). Help or hindrance? The effects of college remediation on academic labor market outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 21.
  • McClain, K., & P. Cobb. (1997). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 236–267.
  • National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2014). Surmounting the barriers: Ethnic diversity in engineering education: Summary of a workshop. The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
  • Oakes, J., Wells, A. S., Jones, M., & Datnow, A. (1997). Detracking: The social construction ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 482-510.
  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
  • Prince, M., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning-methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.
  • Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1048–1073.
  • Riley, N. (1999). Challenging demography: Contributions from feminist theory. Sociological Forum, 14(3), 369–397.
  • Riley, D., Pawley, A., Tucker, J., & Catalano, G. D. (2009). Feminisms in engineering education: Transformative possibilities. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 24(2): 21–40.
  • Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Strategies for counterresistance: Toward socio-transformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 589–622.
  • Rodriguez, A. J. (2004). Teachers’ resistance to ideological and pedagogical change: Definitions, theoretical framework, and significance. In Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms (pp. 17–32). Routledge.
  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview.
  • Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Tobias, S., & Lin, H. (1991). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. American Journal of Physics, 59(12), 1155–1157.
  • Yerrick, R., Lund, C., & Lee, Y (2012). Analysis of active learning environments for chemical engineers: A toolkit for exceptional teaching (TExT) for the 21st century. International Journal of Online Curriculum and Pedagogy, 3(2), 1–24.
  • Yerrick, R., Lund, C., & Lee, Y (2013). Exploring simulator use in the preparation of chemical engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22(3), 362-378.
  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.