20
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

REFERENCES

  • Appel, M., & Kronberger, N. (2012). Stereotypes and the achievement gap: Stereotype threat prior to test taking. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 609–635.
  • Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer.
  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
  • Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Vol. 2 (pp. 154–196). Oxford University Press.
  • Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9–35). Oxford University Press.
  • Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94, 1008–1026.
  • Beilock, S. L., Jellison, W. A., Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Carr, T. H. (2006). On the causal mechanisms of stereotype threat: Can skills that don’t rely heavily on working memory still be threatened Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(8), 1059–1071.
  • Beilock, S. L., Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviations, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 256–276.
  • Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391.
  • Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., Murphy, M. C., & Cimpian, A. (2018). Messages about brilliance undermine women’s interest in educational and professional opportunities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 404–420.
  • Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2018). Evidence of bias against girls and women in contexts that emphasize intellectual ability. American Psychologist, 73(9), 1139–1153.
  • Binning, K., Kaufmann, N., McGreevy, E., Fotuhi, O., Chen, S., Marshman, E., Kalender, Z. Y., Limeri, L., Betancur, L., & Singh, C. (2020). Changing social norms to foster the benefits of collaboration in diverse workgroups. Psychological Science, 31(9), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620929984
  • Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252.
  • Callens, M. V., Kelter, P., Motschenbacher, J., Nyachwaya, J., Ladbury, J. L., & Semanko, A. M. (2019). Developing and implementing a campus-wide professional development program: Successes and challenges. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(2), 68–75.
  • Canning, E., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5(2), eaau4734.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dweck, C. (2006). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In S. J. Ceci & W. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55). American Psychological Association.
  • Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609.
  • Eccles, J., Adler, T., & Meece, J. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternative theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 26–43.
  • Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 183–201.
  • Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T., & Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371–395.
  • Estrada, M., Eroy-Reveles, A., & Matsui, J. (2018). The influence of affirming kindness and community on broadening participation in STEM career pathways. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12(1), 258–297.
  • Freeman, S., Pape-Lindstrom, P., Casper, A., & Eddy, S. (2020). Community college students rise to the challenge. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(5), 7–16.
  • Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process Physical Review ST Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020104.
  • Hill, C., Corbett, C., & Rose, A. (2010) Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509653.pdf
  • Johnson, A., Ong, M., Ko, L. T., Smith, J., & Hodari, A. (2017). Common challenges faced by women of color in physics, and actions faculty can take to minimize those challenges. The Physics Teacher, 55(6), 356–360.
  • Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2019). Why female science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors do not identify with physics: They do not think others see them that way. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020148.
  • Kamen, E., & Leri, A. (2019). Promoting STEM persistence through an innovative field trip-based first-year experience course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(2), 24–31.
  • Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265.
  • Lord, S. M., Camacho, M. M., Layton, R. A., Long, R. A., Ohland, M. W., & Wasburn, M. H. (2009). Who’s persisting in engineering? A comparative analysis of female and male Asian, black, Hispanic, Native American, and white students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15(2), 167–190.
  • Lord, S. M., Layton, R. A., & Ohland, M. W. (2015). Multi-institution study of student demographics and outcomes in electrical and computer engineering in the USA. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(3), 141–150.
  • Maltese, A., & Tai, R. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907.
  • Marchand, G. C., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2013). Stereotype threat and women’s performance in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3050–3061.
  • Marshman, E., Kalender, Z. Y., Nokes-Malach, T., Schunn, C., & Singh, C. (2018). Female students with A’s have similar physics selfefficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020123.
  • Matz, R. L., Koester, B. P., Fiorini, S., Grom, G., Shepard, L., Stangor, C. G., Weiner, B., & McKay, T. A. (2017). Patterns of gendered performance differences in large introductory courses at five research universities. AERA Open, 3(4), 1–12.
  • Mervis, J. (2010). Better intro courses seen as key to reducing attrition of STEM majors. Science, 330, 306.
  • Min, Y., Zhang, G., Long, R. A., Anderson, T. J., & Ohland, M. W. (2011). Nonparametric survival analysis of the loss rate of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 349–373.
  • Moss-Racusin, C.-A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479.
  • National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018 (NSB-2018-1). National Science Foundation.
  • National Student Clearinghouse. (2015). National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, science and engineering degree attainment: 2004-2014. National Student Clearinghouse.
  • Ohland, M. W., & Long, R. A. (2016). The multiple-institution database for investigating engineering longitudinal development: An experiential case study of data sharing and reuse. Advances in Engineering Education, 5, 1–25.
  • Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 259–278.
  • Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245.
  • Packard, B., Solyst, J., Pai, A., & Lu, Y. (2020). Peer-designed active learning modules as a strategy to improve confidence and comprehension within introductory computer science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(5), 76–83.
  • Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49–64.
  • Pawloski, J., & Shabram, P (2019). Two-year community: Building engagement in STEM through career courses at two-year institutions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(2), 9–15.
  • Pollack, E. (2013, October 6). Why are there still so few women in science? The New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/why-are-there-still-so-few-women-in-science.html
  • Safavian, N. (2019). What makes them persist? Expectancy-value beliefs and the math participation, performance, and preparedness of Hispanic youth. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419869342
  • Sevian, H., & Robinson, W. (2011). Clickers promote learning in all kinds of classes: Small and large, graduate and undergraduate, lecture and lab. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(3), 14–18.
  • Tolbert, S., Schindel, A., & Rodriguez, A. J. (2018). Relevance and relational responsibility in justice-oriented science education research. Science Education, 102(4), 796–819.
  • Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.
  • Wheeler, S., & Petty, R. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 797–826.
  • Witherspoon, E. B., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Locating and understanding the largest gender differences in pathways to science degrees. Science Education, 104(2), 144163.
  • Yeager, D., & Dweck, C. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314.
  • Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.