A Process of Pedagogical Change in College Science Education: Instructor Perspectives

References

• Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E., & Weiss, M. (2009). Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-03-0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J., Bonham S. W., Dancy, M. H., & Risley, J. S. (2007). The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) project. Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 1(1), 2–39. https://www.per-central.org/per_reviews/media/volume1/scale-up-2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning for science instruction (Vol. 1). International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, M. (2004). The apprenticeship of observation. ELT Journal, 58(3), 274–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.3.274
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Prince, M., Henderson, C., & Froyd, J. E. (2013). Fidelity of implementation of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS) in engineering science courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 394–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brame, C. J. (2016). Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/active-learning
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Breslow, L. (2010). Wrestling with pedagogical change: The TEAL initiative at MIT. Change, 42(5), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2010.503173.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and … tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11 (4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasteen, S. V., Perkins, K. K., Code, W J., & Wieman, C. E. (2016). The science education initiative: An experiment in scaling up educational improvements in a research university. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century (pp. 125–139). Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., & Klymkowsky, M. (2013). Chemistry, life, the universe, and everything: A new approach to general chemistry, and a model for curriculum reform. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1116–1122. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300456y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevST-PER.10.020119
   Google Scholar
• Harvard University. (n.d.). What is life? From quarks to consciousness (Gen Ed 1029). Harvard College Program in General Education. https://gened.fas.harvard.edu/classes/what-life-quarks-consciousness
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park Rogers, M. A., & Abell, S. K. (2008). The design, enactment, and experience of inquiry-based instruction in undergraduate science education: A case study. Science Education, 92(4), 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergaard, E., Dahlin, B., & Hugo, A. (2008). Doing phenomenology in science education: A research review. Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802264081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, S., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingr-uber, H. A. (Eds.). (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southerland, S. A., Gess-Newsome, J., & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists’ beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 669–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V., & Pollard, J. (2017). Reforming a large foundational course: Successes and challenges. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(12), 1844–1851. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar