13
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research and Teaching

Science Identity and Its Implications for STEM Retention and Career Aspirations Through a Research-Based First-Year Biology Seminar

References

  • Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation, and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353
  • Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014). Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099
  • Barefoot, B. O., & Fidler, P P. (1996). The 1994 National Survey of Freshman Seminar Programs: Continuing innovations in the collegiate curriculum. National Resource Center for the Freshman Year Experience, University of South Carolina. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED393386
  • Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777197
  • Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Perry, K. H., & Presley, J. B. (2014). Improving postsecondary STEM education: Strategies for successful interdisciplinary collaborations and brokering engagement with education research and theory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44, 40–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43631776
  • Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 282–295. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ631562
  • Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:53C441::AID-TEA43E3.0.C0;2-3
  • Brown, B. A. (2006). “It isn’t no slang that can be said about this stuff’: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20096
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212458142
  • Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2803_4
  • Carlone, H. B., Huffling, L. D., Tomasek, T., Hegedus, T. A., Matthews, C. E., Allen, M. H., & Ash, M. C. (2015). “Unthinkable” selves: Identity boundary work in a summer field ecology enrichment program for diverse youth. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1524–1546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1033776
  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
  • Dagley, M. A., Young, C. Y., Georgiopoulos, M., Daire, A. P., Parkinson, C., Prescod, D. J., & Belser, C. T. (2016, June). Recruiting undecided admits to pursue a STEM degree [Paper presentation]. American Society for Engineering Education 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, United States. https://peer.asee.org/recruiting-undecided-admits-to-pursue-a-stem-degree
  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
  • Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2017/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future/pdf/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future.pdf
  • Gilmer, T. C. (2007). An understanding of the improved grades, retention and graduation rates of STEM majors at the Academic Investment in Math and Science (AIMS) program of Bowling Green State University (BGSU). Journal of STEM Education: Innovation & Research, 8(1), 11–21.
  • Goodman, K. (2006). First-year seminars increase persistence and retention. Peer Review, 8, 26–28.
  • Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240487
  • Hendel, D. (2007). Efficacy of participating in a first-year seminar on student satisfaction and retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 8(4), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.2190/G5K7-3529-4X22-8236
  • Hoffman, M., Richmond, J., Morrow, J., & Salomone, K. (2002). Investigating “sense of belonging” in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(3), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.2190/DRYC-CXQ9-JQ8V-HT4V
  • Jamelske, E. (2009). Measuring the impact of a university first-year experience program on student GPA and retention. Higher Education, 57(3), 373–391. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40269128
  • Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191
  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. http://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0019
  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Leonard, W. H. (1997). How do college students learn science? In E. Siebert, M. Caprio, & C. Lyda (Eds.), Effective teaching and course management for university and college science teachers (pp. 5-21). Kendall/Hunt.
  • Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3, 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.
  • National Science Board. (2016). Higher education in science and engineering. In Science and engineering indicators 2016. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/uploads/1/12/chapter-2.pdf
  • Robnett, R. D., Chemers, M. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2015). Longitudinal associations among undergraduates’ research experience, self-efficacy, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21221
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  • Schneider, K. R., Bickel, A., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. (2015). Planning and implementing a comprehensive student-centered research program for first-year STEM undergraduates. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(3), 37–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43631937
  • Schnell, C. A., & Doetkott, C. D. (2003). First-year seminars produce long-term impact. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(4), 377–391. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ671699
  • Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, S., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10131
  • Soldner, M., Rowan-Kenyon, H., Inkelas, K. K., Garvey, J., & Robbins, C. (2012). Supporting students’ intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of living-learning programs among other social-cognitive factors. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 311–336. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41478295
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
  • Thiry, H., Laursen, S. L., & Hunter, A. B. (2011). What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(4), 357–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11777209
  • Toven-Lindsey, B., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Barber, P. H., & Hasson, T. (2014). Increasing persistence in undergraduate science majors: A model for institutional support of underrepresented students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0082
  • United States Department of Education. (n.d.). Science, technology, engineering, and math, including computer science. https://www.ed.gov/stem
  • Vieyra, M., Gilmore, J., & Timmerman, B. (2011). Requiring research may improve retention in STEM fields for underrepresented women. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 32(1), 13–19.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Ward, C., Bennett, J., & Bauer, K. (2002). Content analysis of undergraduate research student evaluations [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Delaware. http://www1.udel.edu/RAIRE/Content.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.