Cross-Disciplinary Learning: A Framework for Assessing Application of Concepts Across Science Disciplines

References

• Acevedo-Gutierrez, A., Borda, E., DeBari, S., Donovan, D. A., & Linneman, S. (2016). A learning cycle approach to guided inquiry in a four-course interdisciplinary science series. Center for Instructional Innovation and Assessment, Western Washington University. https://cii.wwu.edu/showcase2015/smate/default.asp
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 541–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, N. M., & Cooper, M. M. (2014). College chemistry students’ understanding of potential energy in the context of atomic-molecular interactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(6), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikt, W. H., Virginia, J. F., & Michael, C. W. (2013). Productive resources in students’ ideas about energy: An alternative analysis of Watts’ original interview transcripts. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, 9(2), 023101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.023101
   Google Scholar
• Borda, E. J., Anzalone, K., Lockett, M., & Wuotila, S. (2014). Constructivism in context: Factors affecting student learning in four different class-rooms. In D. W. Sunal, C. S. Sunal, Emmet L. Wright, C. L. Mason, & D. Zollman (Eds.), Research-based undergraduate science teaching (vol. 6, pp. 191-219). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Borda, E. J., Boudreaux, A., Fackler-Adams, B., Frazey, P., Julin, S., Pennington, G., & Ogle, J. (2017). Adapting a student-centered chemistry curriculum to a large-enrollment context: Successes and challenges. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(5), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_046_05_8
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, C. W. (1994). Think-aloud methods in chemistry education: Understanding student thinking. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(3), 184. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p184
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 61–100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn, A. (2000). Constructivism: Science education’s “grand unifying theory.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2000.11478630
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, D. A., Atkins, L. J., Salter, I. Y., Gallagher, D. J., Kratz, R. F., Rousseau, J. V., & Nelson, G. D. (2013). Advantages and challenges of using physics curricula as a model for reforming an undergraduate biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-08-0134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, D. A., Rousseau, J., Salter, I., Atkins, L., Acevedo-Gutierrez, A., Kratz, R., Landel, C. C., Mullen, V., & Pape-Lindstrom, P. (2008). Life science and everyday thinking. Activate Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, B. W., Gouvea, J., Geller, B. D., Sawtelle, V., Turpen, C., & Redish, E. F. (2014). Chemical energy in an introductory physics course for the life sciences. American Journal of Physics, 82(5), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4870391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenkraft, A., Nordine, J. C., Chen, R. F., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Neumann, K., & Scheff, A. (2014). Why focus on energy instruction? In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 1–5). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In A. Ortony & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, F., Robinson, S., & Otero, V. (2005). Physics and everyday thinking. It’s About Time: Herff Jones Education Division.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, F., Robinson, S., Price, E., Harlow, D., Andrew, J., & McKean, M. (2016). Next generation physics and everyday thinking. Activate Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, T., Borda, E. J., & Boudreaux, A. (2022). Cross-disciplinary learning index: A quantitative measure of cross-disciplinary learning about energy. Physical Review—Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev-PhysEducRes.18.010108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & DeBoer, G. E. (2014). Developing and using distractor-driven multiple-choice assessments aligned to ideas about energy forms, transformation, transfer, and conservation. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 103–133). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, B. A., Nagel, M. L., & Savani, B. N. (2019). Leveraging understanding of energy from physics to overcome unproductive intuitions in chemistry. Physical Review: Physics Education Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, M. L., & Lindsey, B. A. (2015). Student use of energy concepts from physics in chemistry courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00184B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Opitz, S. T., Neumann, K., Bernholt, S., & Harms, U. (2017). How do students understand energy in biology, chemistry, and physics? Development and validation of an assessment instrument. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3019–3042. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00703a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, M., & Liu, X. (2016). Assessing understanding of the energy concept in different science disciplines. Science Education, 100(3), 483–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1978). Success and understanding. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A. J., Jones, D. C., & Etkina, E. (2018). How students combine resources to make conceptual breakthroughs. Research in Science Education, 50, 1119–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9725-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabo, H. C., Goodhew, L. M., & Robertson, A. D. (2016). University student conceptual resources for understanding energy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1) 010126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Liu, O. L., & Sung, S. (2014). Designing interdisciplinary assessments in sciences for college students: An example on osmosis. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.879224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Sung, S., & Zhang, D. (2015). Toward an analytic framework of Interdisciplinary Reasoning and Communication (IRC) processes in science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2809–2835. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1106026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar