An Interdisciplinary STEM Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Establishes a Community of Practice and Promotes Psychosocial Gains

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education. AAAS.
   Google Scholar
• Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014). Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., & Squire, A. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (4), 489–452. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1104_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. D., Horn, R. S., & King, G. (2018). The effective implementation of professional learning communities. Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership, 5, 53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Kloser, M. J., Fukami, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2013). Context matters: Volunteer bias, small sample size, and the value of comparison groups in the assessment of research-based undergraduate introductory biology lab courses. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 14(2), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v14i2.609
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrino, S. S., & Gerace, W. J. (2016). Why STEM learning communities work: The development of psycho-social learning factors through social interaction. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 4(1), 1–22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1112934.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chemer, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin, L. A., Graham, M. J., & Dolan, E. L. (2015). Modeling course-based undergraduate research experiences: An agenda for future research and evaluation. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin, L. A., Runyon, C. R., Ghanem, E., Sandy, M., Clark, G., Palmer, G. C., & Dolan, E. L. (2018). Effects of discovery, iteration, and collaboration in laboratory courses on undergraduates’ research career intentions fully mediated by student ownership. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin, L. A., Runyon, C., Robinson, A., & Dolan, E. L. (2015). The Lab Course Assessment Survey: A tool to measure three dimensions of research-course design. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-03-0073
   Google Scholar
• Corwin Auchincloss, L., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C., Palaez, N., Rowland, S., Towns, M., Trautmann, N. M., Varma-Nelson, P., Weston, T. J., & Dolan E. L. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: A meeting report. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(1) 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-01-0004
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 515–541). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dagley, M., Georgiopoulos, A. R., Reece, A., & Young, C. (2015). Increasing retention and graduation rates through a STEM learning community. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115584746
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, E. L. (2016). Course-based undergraduate research experiences: Current knowledge and future directions. National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, E. L., Lally, D. J., Brooks, E., & Tax, F. E. (2008). Prepping students for authentic science. Science Teacher, 75(7), 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, J. C., & Triplett, E. W. (2008). Whole genome sequencing in the undergraduate classroom: Outcomes and lessons from a pilot course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 9(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v9.89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2011). Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific community. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Findley-Van Nostrand, D., & Pollenz, R. S. (2017). Evaluating psychosocial mechanisms underlying STEM persistence in undergraduates: Evidence of impact from a six-day precollege engagement STEM Academy program. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(36), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0294
   Google Scholar
• Flannelly, K. J., Flannelly, L. T., & Jankowski, K. R. (2018). Threats to the internal validity of experimental and quasi-experimental research in healthcare. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 24(3), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2017.1421019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, M. F., Johnson, J. L., & Sawyer, T. P. (2019). The KEYSTONE Program. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(6), 8–13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26901326
   Google Scholar
• Hanauer, D. I., & Dolan, E. L. (2014). The project ownership survey: Measuring differences in scientific inquiry experiences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K., & Lopatto, D. (2011). Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: Changes in career choices and attitude. CBE— Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 279–286. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-12-0151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, L. R., Ye, F., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2009). Sense of belonging and persistence in white and African American first-year students. Research in Higher Education, 50(7), 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9137-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, P. R., Schultz, P., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. D., Sprowles, A. E., Goldenberg, K. R., Margell, S. T., & Castellino, L. (2020). Effect of a place-based learning community on belonging, persistence, and equity gaps for first-year STEM students. Innovative Higher Education, 45, 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09519-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krim, J. S., Cote, L. E., Schwartz, R. S., Stone, E. M., Cleeves, J. J., Barry, K. J., Burgess, W., Buxner, S. R., Gerton, J. M., Horvath, L., Keller, J. M., Lee, S., Locke, S. M. & Rebar, B. M. (2019). Models and impacts of science research experiences: A review of the literature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(65), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0069
   Google Scholar
• Kuchynka, S., Findley-Van Nostrand, D., & Pollenz, R. S. (2019). Evaluating psychosocial mechanisms underlying STEM persistence in undergraduates: Scalability and longitudinal analysis of three cohorts from a six-day precollege engagement STEM Academy program. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-01-0028
   Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layous, K., Davis, E. M., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Cook, J. E., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Feeling left out, but affirmed: Protecting against the negative effects of low belonging in college. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopatto, D. (2010). Science in solution: The impact of undergraduate research on student learning. Research Corporation for Science Advancement.
   Google Scholar
• Majka, E. A., Raimondi, S. L., & Guenther, M. F. (2020). Adapting an interdisciplinary, course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) course to an online format. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 4(1), 74–75. https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/4/1/9
   Google Scholar
• Majka, E. A., Raimondi, S. L., & Guenther, M. F. (2021). Science Bootcamp goes virtual: A compressed, interdisciplinary online CURE promotes psychosocial gains in STEM transfer students. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 22(1), ev22i1.2353. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2353
   Google Scholar
• Mraz-Craig, J. A., Daniel, K. L., Bucklin, C. J., Mishra, C., Ali, L., & Clase, K. L. (2018). Student identities in authentic course-based undergraduate research experience. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(1), 68–75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26491348
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Executive Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Rajapaksha, A., & Hirsch, A. S. (2017). Competency-based teaching of college physics: The philosophy and the practice. Physics Review—Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev-PhysEducRes.13.020130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., Savani, K., Komarraju, M., Morrison, M. M., Boggs, C., & Ambady, N. (2018). Meta-lay theories of scientific potential drive underrepresented students’ sense of belonging to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316(5824), 548–549. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychology, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, C. D., Alvarez, C. J., Bednarski, A. E., Dunbar, D., Goodman, A. L., Reinke, C., Rosenwald, A. G., Wolyniak, M. J., Bailey, C., Barnard, A., Bazinet, C., Beach, D. L., Bedard, J. E. J., Bhalla, S., Braverman, J., Burg, M., Chandrasekaran, V., Chung, H.-M., Clase, K., … Elgin, S. C. R. (2014). A course-based research experience: How benefits change with increased investment in instructional time. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-08-0152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortlidge, E. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). How to assess your CURE: A practical guide for instructors of course-based undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(3), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. U., Hayes, S., & Shea, P. (2017). A critical review of the use of Wenger’s Community of Practice (CoP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000-2014. Online Learning, 21(1), 209–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, W. M., & Wenger, E. (2010). Our world as a learning system: A communities of practice approach. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 107–124). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_7
   Google Scholar
• Solanski, S., McPartian, P., Xu, D., & Sato, D. (2019). Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community? PLOS One, 14(3), e0213827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarejo, M., Barlow, A. E., Kogan, D., Veazey, B. D., & Sweeney, J. K. (2008). Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: Career paths survey results. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-04-0018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2005). Knowledge management as a donut: Shaping your knowledge and strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal, 68(3), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2010). Conceptual tools for CoPs as social learning systems: Boundaries, identity, trajectories and participation. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 125–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_8
   Google Scholar