Science Assessments as a Learning Opportunity Feedforward With Multiple Attempts

References

• Baker, D. J., & Zuvela, D. (2013). Feedforward strategies in the first-year experience of online and distributed learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayerlein, L. (2014). Students’ feedback preferences: How do students react to timely and automatically generated assessment feedback? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 916–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.870531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-004-3567-9
   Google Scholar
• Dulama, M. E., & Ilovan, O. (2016). How powerful is feedforward in university education? A case study in Romanian geography education on increasing learning efficiency. Journal of Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(3), 827–848. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.3.0392
   Google Scholar
• Faulconer, E. K., Griffith, J. C., & Frank, H. (2021). If at first you do not succeed: Student behavior when provided feedforward with multiple trials for online summative assessments. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4), 586–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1664454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, R. A., Raymond, M. R., & Haist, S. A. (2015). Repeat testing effects on credentialing exams: Are repeaters misinformed or uninformed? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12059
   Google Scholar
• Ford, K., & Vignare, K. (2015). The evolving military learner population: A review of the literature. Online Learning, 19(1), 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P W. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M. (2010). Try feedforward instead of feedback. Art From Ashes. https://www.artfromashes.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/FeedFor-ward-Article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R. N., & Ryan, C. N. (2012). Introductory statistics (1st ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (1999). Learner-centered assessments on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2011). Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.486859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koen, K., Bitzer, E. M., & Beets, P A. D. (2012). Feedback or feedforward? A case study in one higher education classroom. Journal of Social Sciences, 32(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893068
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. L., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Angello, G. (2012). Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: Fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting. Journal of Psychological Science, 23(22), 1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443370
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marden, N. Y., Ulman, L. G., Wilson, F. S., & Velan, G. M. (2013). Online feedback assessments in physiology: Effects on students’ learning experiences and outcomes. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00092.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orchard, R. K. (2016). Multiple attempts for online assessments in an operations management course: An exploration. Journal of Education for Business, 91(8), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2016.1256262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. T., & Sarbaum, J. K. (2015). Online homework management systems: Should we allow multiple attempts? American Economist, 60(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451506000203
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2015). Assessment as learning and empowerment: Towards sustainable learning in higher education. In M. Peris-Ortiz & J. Merigo Lindahl (Eds.), Sustainable learning in higher education (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9_1
   Google Scholar
• Sancho-Vinuesa, T., Masià, R., Fuertes-Alpiste, M., & Molas-Castells, N. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of continuous activity with automatic feedback in online calculus. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancho-Vinuesa, T., & Viladoms, N. D. (2012). A proposal for formative assessment with automatic feedback on an online mathematics subject. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 9(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1285
   Google Scholar
• Sterba, S. K., & Foster, E. M. (2008). Self-selected sample. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 806–808). SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n525
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D., Panus, P., Hagemeier, N., Thigpen, J., & Brooks, L. (2014). Pharmacy student self-testing as a predictor of examination performance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(2), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78232
   Google Scholar
• Stodberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triola, M. (2013). Statdisk [computer software]. Pearson Education. https://www.statdisk.com/
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. (2012). Seven keys to effective feedback. In M. Scherer (Ed.), On formative assessment: Readings from educational leadership (pp. 24–35). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Yourstone, S. A., Kraye, H. S., & Albaum, G. (2010). Online quantitative-based assignments—are more attempts better for learning? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8(2), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2010.00260.x
   Google Scholar