How Do Students Interact With the Primary Scientific Literature in an Undergraduate Science Program?

References

• Auerbach, A. J., & Schussler, E. E. (2017). Curriculum alignment with vision and change improves student scientific literacy. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0160
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruehl, M., Pan, D., & Ferrer-Vinent, I. J. (2015). Demystifying the chemistry literature: Building information literacy in first-year chemistry students through student-centered learning and experiment design. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500412z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the process of science: Faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, S., & Millar, R. (1988). Language and conceptual understanding in science: A comparison of English and Asian language speaking children. Research in Science & Technological Education, 6(1), 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, H., & Yarden, A. (2009). “Here the scientists explain what I said.” Coordination practices elicited during the enactment of the results and discussion sections of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 349–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9114-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaspohler, M. R., Rux, E. M., & Flaspohler, J. A. (2007). The annotated bibliography and citation behavior: Enhancing student scholarship in an undergraduate biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-04-0022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallo, M., & Rinaldo, V. (2012). Towards a mastery understanding of critical reading in biology: The use of highlighting by students to assess their value judgment of the importance of primary literature. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 13(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v13i2.493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillen, C. M. (2006). Criticism and interpretation: Teaching the persuasive aspects of research articles. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gottesman, A. J., & Hoskins, S. G. (2013). CREATE cornerstone: Introduction to Scientific Thinking, a new course for STEM-interested freshmen, demystifies scientific thinking through analysis of scientific literature. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-11-0201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2004). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 129–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/).cedpsych.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, S. G., Lopatto, D., & Stevens, L. M. (2011). The C.R.E.A.T.E. approach to primary literature shifts undergraduates’ self-assessed ability to read and analyze journal articles, attitudes about science, and epistemo-logical beliefs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, S. G., Stevens, L. M., & Nehm, R. H. (2007). Selective use of the primary literature transforms the classroom into a virtual laboratory. Genetics, 176(3), 1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.071183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L., Meyer, W., & Parkinson, J. (2006). A study of the writing tasks and reading assigned to undergraduate science students at a South African university. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A., & Moosa, S. (2005). Culture and personal epistemology: US and Middle Eastern students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing. Social Psychology of Education, 8(4), 375–393.
   Google Scholar
• Kozeracki, C. A., Carey, M. F., Colicelli, J., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., & Grossel, M. (2006). An intensive primary-literature-based teaching program directly benefits undergraduate science majors and facilitates their transition to doctoral programs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5(4), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-02-0144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krontiris-Litowitz, J. (2013). Using primary literature to teach science literacy to introductory biology students. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 14(1), 66–77. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.538
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marusic, A., & Marusic, M. (2003). Teaching students how to read and write science: A mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine. Academic Medicine, 78(12), 1235–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muench, S. B. (2000). Choosing primary literature in biology to achieve specific educational goals: Some guidelines for identifying the strengths and weaknesses of prospective research articles. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(4), 255–260.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2005). The conditional and interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: Motivational strategies. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 731–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-6224-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, L., & Cano, F. (2006). The epistemological beliefs, learning approaches and study orchestrations of university students. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600923442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round, J. E., & Campbell, A. M. (2013). Figure facts: Encouraging undergraduates to take a data-centered approach to reading primary literature. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, B. K., Kadandale, P., He, W., Murata, P. M., Latif, Y., & Warschauer, M. (2014). Practice makes pretty good: Assessment of primary literature reading abilities across multiple large-enrollment biology laboratory courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-02-0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1993). Comparisons of beliefs about the nature of knowledge and learning among postsecondary students. Research in Higher Education, 34(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura-Totten, M., & Dalman, N. E. (2013). The CREATE method does not result in greater gains in critical thinking than a more traditional method of analyzing the primary literature. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 14(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v14i2.506
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shannon, S., & Winterman, B. (2012). Student comprehension of primary literature is aided by companion assignments emphasizing pattern recognition and information literacy. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 68. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1541
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. R. (2001). Guided literature explorations: Introducing students to the primary literature. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(7), 465–469.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelberg, B. D. (2014). A focused assignment encouraging deep reading in undergraduate biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, L. M., & Hoskins, S. G. (2014). The CREATE strategy for intensive analysis of primary literature can be used effectively by newly trained faculty to produce multiple gains in diverse students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 224–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Significance of limited English proficiency and cultural capital to the performance in science of Chinese-Australians. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, H. N. (2002). A study of the effects of English language proficiency and scientific reasoning skills on the acquisition of science content knowledge by Hispanic English language learners and native English language speaking students participating in grade 10 science classes (UMI No. 9961541) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Lowell]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global Database.
   Google Scholar
• van Lacum, E., Ossevoort, M., Buikema, H., & Goedhart, M. (2012). First experiences with reading primary literature by undergraduate life science students. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1795–1821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.582654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkade, H., & Lim, S. H. (2016). Undergraduate science students’ attitudes toward and approaches to scientific reading and writing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(4), 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Willard, A. M., & Brasier, D. J. (2014). Controversies in neuroscience: A literature-based course for first-year undergraduates that improves scientific confidence while teaching concepts. Journal of Undergrad Neuroscience Education, 12(2), A159–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willmott, C. J. R., Clark, R. P., & Harrison, T. M. (2003). Introducing undergraduate students to scientific reports. Bioscience Education, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.2003.01010010
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. (2009). Linking assessment questions to a research article to stimulate self-directed learning and develop high-order cognitive skills in an undergraduate module of molecular genetics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(4), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-06-0040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F Y., Huang, R. T., & Tsai, I. J. (2016). The effects of epistemic beliefs in science and gender difference on university students’ sciencetext reading: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 473–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar