13
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research and Teaching

Fostering Scientific Literacy With Problem Sets That Generate Cognitive Presence and Fulfill Basic Psychological Needs

References

  • Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
  • Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., Blaum, D., & Millis, K. (2019). A reasoned approach to dealing with fake news. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218814855
  • Charpentier, C. J., De Neve, J.-E., Li, X., Roiser, J. P., & Sharot, T. (2016). Models of affective decision-making: How do feelings predict choice? Psychological Science, 27(6), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616634654
  • Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2020a). Disagreeing about how to know: The instructional value of explorations into knowing. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786387
  • Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2020b). Education for a “posttruth” world: New directions for research and practice. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20940683
  • Darner, R. (2019). How can educators confront science denial? Educational Researcher, 48(4), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19849415
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Duffy, T. M., Dueber, B., & Hawley, C. L. (1998). Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In C. J. Bonk and K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 51–78). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Funk, C., Hefferon, M., Kennedy, B., & Johnson, C. (2019). Trust and mistrust in Americans’ views of scientific experts. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/08/02/trust-and-mistrust-in-americans-views-of-scientific-experts
  • Garcia-Marques, T., & Loureiro, F. (2016). Dispositional beliefs regarding “affect as information” determine the perception of persuasive self-efficacy. Análise Psicológica, 34(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1098
  • Garrison, D. R. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge/Falmer.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
  • Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225
  • Greene, J. A., Cartiff, B. M., Duke, R. F., & Deekens, V. M. (2019). A nation of curators: Educating students to be critical consumers and users of online information. In P. Kendeou, D. H. Robinson, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Misinformation and fake news in education (pp. 187–206). Information Age Publishing.
  • Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining the social construction of knowledge in computer conference. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431 https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
  • Hagger, M. S., Sultan, S., Hardcastle, S. J., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2015). Perceived autonomy support and autonomous motivation toward mathematics activities in educational and out-of-school contexts is related to mathematics homework behavior and attainment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.002
  • Hobbs, R. (2017). Teaching and learning in a post-truth world. Educational Leadership, 75(3), 26–31.
  • Jayasinghe, I., & Darner, R. (2021). Do emotions, nature relatedness, and conservation concern influence students’ evaluations of arguments about biodiversity conservation? Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(1), e2230. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9157
  • Johnston, M. M., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Measuring basic needs satisfaction: Evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluations of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.003
  • Journell, W. (Ed.). (2019). Unpacking fake news: An educator’s guide to navigating the media with students. Teachers College Press.
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  • Legault, L. (2017). Self-determination theory. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–9). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1162-1
  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
  • Liu, D. W. C. (2012). Science denial and the science classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0029
  • Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
  • Prado, C. G. (Ed.). (2018). America’s post-truth phenomenon: When feelings and opinions trump facts and evidence. Praeger.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7662–7669. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115
  • Sinatra, G. M., & Lombardi, D. (2020). Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgements. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1730181

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.