Developing Bureaucracies for Environmental Governance: State Authority and World Bank Conditionality in Laos

References

• Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 2003. Lessons Learned from the District Upland Development and Conservation Project, Lao PDR. Vientiane: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, K., and K. Canby. 2011. Baseline Study 2, Lao PDR: Overview of Forest Governance, Markets and Trade. Kuala Lumpur: Forest Trends, for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Asia Regional Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., D. Lewis, S. Batterbury, E. Olson, and S. M. Siddiqi. 2007. “Of Texts and Practices: Empowerment and Organisational Cultures in World Bank-funded Rural Development Programmes.” The Journal of Development Studies 43 (4): 597–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouahom, B., A. Glendinning, S. Nillson, and M. Victor, eds. 2004. Poverty Reduction and Shifting Cultivation Stabilization in the Uplands of Lao PDR. Vientiane: National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI).
   Google Scholar
• Cepek, M. 2011. “Foucault in the Forest: Questioning Environmentality in Amazonia.” American Ethnologist 38 (3): 501–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIF. 2011. Forest Investment Program. Climate Investment Funds (CIF). Accessed October 5 2011. https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/cif/node/5.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. 2002. “Reinventing Institutions: Bricolage and the Social Embeddedness of Natural Resource Management.” The European Journal of Development Research 14 (2): 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Duckett, J. 2001. “Bureaucrats in Business, Chinese-style: The Lessons of Market Reform and State Entrepreneurialism in the People’s Republic of China.” World Development 29 (1): 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIA. 2011. Crossroads: The Illicit Timber Trade Between Laos and Vietnam. London: Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA).
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Defense. 2005. Review of the Nakai–Nam Theun Social and Environmental Management Framework and First Operational Plan (SEMFOP-1) for the Nam Theun 2 Hydropower Project. New York: Environmental Defense Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. 1990. The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development,’ Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fritzen, S. 2007. “Discipline and Democratize: Patterns of Bureaucratic Accountability in Southeast Asia.” International Journal of Public Administration 30 (12-14): 1435–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsborough, M. 2007. “Globalisation and the State Revisited: A View from Provincial Vietnam.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 37 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. 2004. “Eco-governmentality and other Transnational Practices of a ‘Green’ World Bank.” In Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, edited by R. Peet, and M. Watts, 166–92. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. 2005. Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, A., and P. Luong. 2002. “Reconceptualizing the State: Lessons from Post-communism.” Politics and Society 30 (4): 529–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooley, R. 1976. “The Contribution of Technocrats to Development in Southeast Asia.” Asian Survey 16 (12): 1156–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igoe, J., and D. Brockington. 2007. “Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction.” Conservation and Society 5 (4): 432–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kipnis, A. 2008. “Audit Cultures: Neoliberal Governmentality, Socialist Legacy, or Technologies of Governing?” American Ethnologist 35 (2): 275–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, R. and R. Vanneman. 1985. “Bureaucrats versus the State in Capitalist and Socialist Regimes.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 27: 111–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, C. 2011. “Fragmented Sovereignty: Land Reform and Dispossession in Laos.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4): 885–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, A. 2008. “State Making, Knowledge, and Ignorance: Translation and Concealment in Mexican Forestry Institutions.” American Anthropologist 110 (4): 484–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2006. The Fourth Circle: A Political Ecology of Sumatra’s Rainforest Frontier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, D., T. Scudder, and L. Talbot. 2006. Tenth Report of the International Environmental and Social Panel of Experts. Vientiane: Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, D., T. Scudder, and L. Talbot. 2010. Sixteenth Report of the International Environmental and Social Panel of Experts. Vientiane: Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, A. 2011. “Overcoming Barriers to Effective Environmental Aid: A Comparison between Japan, Germany, Denmark, and the World Bank.” The Journal of Environment Development 20: 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. 2004. “Is Good Policy Unimplementable? Reflections on the Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice.” Development and Change 35 (4): 639–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunberg, B., and J. Nellis. 1995. Civil Service Reform and the World Bank. Washington DC: World Bank Discussion Papers, No. 161.
   Google Scholar
• Ribbhagen, C. 2011. “What Makes a Technocrat?: Explaining Variation in Technocratic Thinking among Elite Bureaucrats.” Public Policy and Administration 26: 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Riles, A. 2004. “Real Time: Unwinding Technocratic and Anthropological Knowledge.” American Ethnologist 31 (3): 392–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robichaud, W., C. Marsh, Sangthong Southammakith, and Sirivanh Khounthikoummane. 2001. Review of the National Protected Area System in Lao PDR. Vientiane: Lao-Swedish Forestry Programme (LSFP)/Division of Forest Resource Conservation (DFRC), Government of Lao PDR.
   Google Scholar
• Santiso, C. 2004. “Development Finance, Governance and Conditionality: Politics Matter.” International Public Management Journal 7 (1): 73–100.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scudder, T. 2005. The Future of Large Dams: Dealing with Social, Environmental, and Political Costs. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. 2009. “World Bank Directed-Development? Negotiating Participation in the Nam Theun 2 Hydropower Project in Laos.” Development and Change 40 (3): 487–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. 2011. “Bureaucratic Migrants and the Potential of Prosperity in Upland Laos.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 42 (2): 211–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. 2012. Natural Potency and Political Power: Forests and State Authority in Contemporary Laos. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart-Fox, M. 2004. Politics and Reform in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Williamsburg: The College of William and Mary.
   Google Scholar
• UNPAN. 2005. Lao People’s Democratic Republic Public Administration Country Profile. Vientiane: United Nations Public Administration Network.
   Google Scholar
• Vatthana Pholsena. 2006. Post-War Laos: The Politics of Culture, History and Identity. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, J. 1997. “The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction.” In Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, edited by J. Weintraub, and K. Kumar, 1–42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, P., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2006. “Parks and Peoples: The Social Impact of Protected Areas.” Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 251–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. 2006. “Beyond the Technocrat? The Professional Expert in Development Practice.” Development and Change 37 (3): 501–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMPA. 2005. Social and Environment Management Framework and 1^st Operational Plan (SEMFOP-1). Vientiane: Nam Theun 2 Watershed Management and Protection Authority (WMPA). Accessed 10 March 2010. http://www.namtheun2.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=90&Itemid=101.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2006. Engaging with Fragile States. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2010. Board Meeting on Nam Theun 2 Project: Briefing Summary, 22 November 2010. Accessed August 5, 2011. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLAOPRD/Resources/293582-1092106399982/492430-1092106479653/NT2BriefingSummary_Nov2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. The Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric Project. Accessed August 15, 2011. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/EASTASIAPACIFICEXT/LAOPRDEXTN/0,contentMDK:21109084∼pagePK:141137∼piPK:141127∼theSitePK:293684,00.html.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank and UNDP. 2011. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. Accessed October 5, 2011. http://www.climatefinanceoptions.org/cfo/node/57.
   Google Scholar