Judicial Justice for Special Economic Zone Land Resistance

References

• Afonso, A. 2008. “Introduction.” In The Hindus of Goa and the Portuguese Republic, edited by A. de Noronha and translated from Portuguese by A. Afonso, xi–xlix. Goa: Broadway Book Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Alvares, C., ed. 2002. Fish Curry and Rice. Mapusa: The Other India Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baviskar, A. 2012. “Public Interest and Private Compromises: The Politics of Environmental Negotiation in Delhi, India.” In Law Against the State: Ethnographic Forays Into Law’s Transformations, edited by J. Eckert, B. Donahoe, C. Strümpell, and Z. Biner, 171–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, U. 1985. “Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court of India.” Third World Legal Studies 4 (6): 107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Bedi, H. 2013. “Special Economic Zones: National Land Challenges, Localized Protest.” Contemporary South Asia 21 (1): 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Bedi, H., and L. Tillin. 2015. “Inter-state Competition, Land Deals, and Resistance in India.” Oxford Development Studies ( Forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 2008. “Democracy and Economic Transformation in India.” Economic and Political Weekly 43 (16): 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J., and J. Comaroff. 2007. “Law and Disorder in the Postcolony.” Social Anthropology 15 (2): 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Comptroller and Auditor General of India. 2008. Audit Report (Civil), Goa for the Year 2007–2008. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., G. Williams, M. Srivastava, and R. Veron, eds. 2005. Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Silva, Julio, ed. 2008. A Celebration of Peoples Struggles. Margao: Ramponkars.
   Google Scholar
• Dressel, B. 2014. “Governance, Courts and Politics in Asia.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 44 (2): 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Extra Ordinary Civil Writ Jurisdiction. 2007a. Writ Petition: Miss Swati Sridhar Kerkar and 4 Others v/s State of Goa and 2 Others. Panaji: High Court of Bombay at Goa.
   Google Scholar
• Extra Ordinary Civil Writ Jurisdiction. 2007b. Writ Petition: Synopsis and Chronology of Dates and Events. Panaji: High Court of Bombay at Goa.
   Google Scholar
• Extra Ordinary Civil Writ Jurisdiction. 2008a. The Humble Petition of the Petitioner. Panaji: High Court of Bombay at Goa.
   Google Scholar
• Extra Ordinary Civil Writ Jurisdiction. 2008b. Writ Petition: Lawrence Fernandes and 4 Others v/s State of Goa and 2 Others. Panaji: High Court of Bombay at Goa.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, C. 2008. “Press Release.” Loutulim, October 24.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, A., and R. Jenkins. 2001. “Hybrid Forms of Accountability: Citizen Engagement in Institutions of Public-Sector Oversight in India.” Public Management Review 3 (3): 363–383.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Goa. 2006. Government of Goa’s Policy on SEZ. Porvorim: Industries Trade and Commerce Department.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 1995. “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourses of Corruption, the Culture of Politics and the Imagined State.” American Ethnologist 22 (2): 375–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., and K. Sivaramakrishnan, eds. 2011. The State in India After Liberalization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschl, R. 2008. “The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts.” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 93–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 2007. “The Politics of India’s Special Economic Zones.” Paper, Research Colloquium, India’s Great Transformation? Columbia University, September 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R., and A. M. Goetz. 1999. “Accounts and Accountability: Theoretical Implications of the Right-to-Information Movement in India.” Third World Quarterly 20 (3): 603–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R., L. Kennedy, and P. Mukhopadhyay. 2014. Power, Policy, and Protest: The Politics of India’s Special Economic Zones. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, D. 2002. Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levien, M. 2011. “Special Economic Zones and Accumulation by Dispossession in India.” Journal of Agrarian Change. 11 (4): 454–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGOs in India. 2013. “Public Interest Litigation.” Accessed June 30, 2014. http://www.ngosindia.com/resources/pil.php
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. 2015. “Law and Larai: The (De)Judicialisation of Subaltern Resistance in West Bengal.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 45 (4). doi:10.1080/00472336.2015.1040821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskarsson, P., and K. Nielsen. 2014. “Development Deadlock: Aborted Industrialization and Blocked Land Restitution in West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh, India.” Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal 1 (1): 267–278.
   Google Scholar
• People’s Movement Against SEZs. 2007. Memorandum on the Immediate Withdrawal of SEZ Policy. Loutulim, October 29.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. 2005. “Development and Geography: Towards a Postcolonial Development Geography?” Progress in Human Geography 29 (3): 291–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, B. 2007. “Pro-Human Rights but Anti-Poor?: A Critical Evaluation of the Indian Supreme Court from a Social Movement Perspective.” Human Rights Review 18 (3): 157–187.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., ed. 1998. “Corruption and development: An Introduction.” In Corruption and Development, 1–14. Abingdon: Frank Cass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, S. 2010. “Grounds for Goa Mulnivasi Liberation Struggle.” Paper, Red Politics, Green Movements Conference, Maharashtra.
   Google Scholar
• SEZ Virodhi Manch. 2007. SEZ Location Considerations. Panaji: SEZ Virodhi Manch.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, S. 2012. “The Judiciary, Policy, and Politics in India.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Asia, edited by B. Dressel, 56–76. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R. 2012. “Inefficiency and Abuse of Compulsory Land Acquisition.” Economic and Political Weekly 47 (19): 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. 2002. Indica: A Critical Portrait of Postcolonial Goa. New Delhi: Bibliophile South Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, N. 2011. “The Rule of Law and the Rule of Property.” In The State in India After Liberalization, edited by A. Gupta and K. Sivaramakrishnan, 175–194. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, B. 2009. “The Uses and Meaning of Liminality.” International Political Anthropology 2 (1): 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, B. 2012. “Notes Towards an Anthropology of Political Revolutions.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 54 (3): 676–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International India. 2008. TII-CMS India Corruption Study 2007: With Focus on BPL Households. New Delhi: Transparency International India.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. 1964. “Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period.” In Rites de Passage. The Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society, Symposium on New Approaches to the Study of Religion, 4–20. Washington, DC: American Ethnological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. W., and R. Schemer. 1988. The Anthropology of Performance. New York: Paj Publications.
   Google Scholar