Perceived importance of intellectual property protection methods by Korean SMEs involved in product innovation and their value appropriation

References

• Ahn, H., Mah, J. S. 2007. Development of technology-intensive industries in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37(3), 364–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R.R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A. 2001. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30(4), 611–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., Kabla, I. 1998. What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27, 127–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, H. M. 2015. Exploring the use of patents in a weak institutional environment: The effects of innovation partnerships, firm ownership, and new management practices. Technovation, 45, 63–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant, J., Tidd, J. 2013. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (5th ed.). Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., Petersen, B. C. 2017. What promotes R&D? Comparative evidence from around the world. Research Policy, 46(2), 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., Walsh, J. P. 1998. Appropriability conditions and why firms patent and why they do not in the American manufacturing sector. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., Walsh, J. P. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Papers Series (7552).
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, C., Haskel, J. E., Slaughter, M. J. 2010. Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(2), 191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., Marengo, L., Pasquali, C. 2006. How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. Research Policy, 35(8), 1110–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallini, N. T. 2002. The economics of patents: lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 131–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. J. H., Merges, R., Samuelson, P., Sichelman, T. 2010. High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system: results of the 2008 Berkeley patent survey. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 24(4),1255–1328.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis (5th ed). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, R., Torrisi, S. 2001. Codified-tacit and general-specific knowledge in the division of labour among firms: A study of the software industry. Research Policy, 30(9), 1425–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O. 1999. The Economics and Managment of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Granstrand, Ove. 2018. Evolving Properties of Intellectual Capitalism: Patents and Innovations for Growth and Welfare. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gnyawali, D. R., Park, B. J. 2009. Co‐opetition and technological innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Ziedonis, R. H. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. Rand Journal of Economics, 101–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., Sena, V. 2014. The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: a review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanel, P. 2008. The use of intellectual property rights and innovation by manufacturing firms in Canada. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(4), 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Harabi, N. 1995. Appropriability of technical innovations: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 24(6), 981–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, JJ. 1979, Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Puumalainen, K. 2007. Nature and dynamics of appropriability: strategies for appropriating returns on innovation. R&D Management, 37(2), 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussinger, K. 2006. Is silence golden? Patents versus secrecy at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 735–752.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, D. M. 2010. Debt as venture capital. Univ. Illinois Law Rev, 2010(4), 1169–1210.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, S. J., Sohn, S. Y. 2020. Patent-based framework for assisting entrepreneurial firms’ R&D partner selection: Leveraging their limited resources and managing the tension between learning and protection. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 57, 101575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D., Eisenhardt, K. M. 2008. Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 295–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. J., Rice, M. P. 2002. Leveraging the value of proprietary technologies. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. K., Lee, K., Park, W. G. Choo, K. 2012. Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development. Research Policy, 41(2), 358–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitching, J., Blackburn, R. A. 2003. Innovation, intellectual property and informality: evidence from a study of small enterprises and some implications for policy. In: Blackburn, R.A. (Ed.), Intellectual Property and Innovation Management in Small Firms (pp. 16–34). Routledge, London, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kultti, K., Takalo, T., Toikka, J. 2006. Simultaneous model of innovation, secrecy, and patent policy. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, May, 82–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., Salter, A. 2005. My precious. The role of appropriability strategies in shaping innovative performance. DRUID Working Paper, No. 05-02, Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., Salter, A. 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., Byma, J. 2009. If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies. Research Policy, 38(9), 1478–1488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., Griliches, Z. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1987(3), 783–831.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, R. J., Sager, T. W. 2007. Patents, venture capital, and software startups. Research Policy, 36, 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1986. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science, 32(2), 173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, W. 1995. Innovation in Australian Manufacturing 1994. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, catalogue no.8116.0.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, I., Boden, M. 2000. Introduction: Are Services Special? In: Miles, I., Boden, M. (Eds.), Services and the Knowledge-Based Economy. Continuum, London, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Munari, F., Toschi, L. 2015. Do patents affect VC financing? Empirical evidence from the nanotechnology sector. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 623–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhäusler, P. 2012. The use of patents and informal appropriation mechanisms—Differences between sectors and among companies. Technovation, 32(12), 681–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto, M., Pérez-Cano, C. 2004. The influence of knowledge attributes on innovation protection mechanisms. Knowledge and Process Management, 11 (2), 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, M. J., Santamaría, L. 2010. Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1), 44–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 1994. Innovation and diffusion in small firms: theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6(5), 327–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Orlitzky, M. 2001. Does firm size comfound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance?. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. 2020. Determining punitive damages for patent infringement -intentional infringement and statutory factors affecting punitive damages. Law & Technology, 16(2), 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Radauer, A., Streicher, J., Ohler, F. 2007. Benchmarking National and Regional Support Services for SMEs in the Field of Intellectual and Industrial Property, Final Benchmarking Report on Behalf of the European Commission, Austrian Institute for SME Research.
   Google Scholar
• Shefer, D., Frenkel, A. 2005. R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 25(1), 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somaya, D. 2012. Patent strategy and management: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1084–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, C. M., Maggio, D. S. E. 2015. Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation?. World Development, 66, 665–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed., Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15 (6), 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2018. Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L., Alexy, O., Block, J., Sandner, P. G. 2016. The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures’ success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 393–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S. 2005. Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer survey. Industry and Innovation, 12(2), 153–184.
   Google Scholar
• Tether, B., Massini, S. 2007. Services and the Innovation Infrastructure. Innovation in Services. London, UK Department of Trade and Industry Occasional Paper No. 9, pp. 135–192.
   Google Scholar
• van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., François, D. 2009. The cost factor in patent systems. The Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9(4), 329–355.
   Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R., Schneider, C. 2018. Which IP strategies do young highly innovative firms choose?. Small Business Economics, 50(1), 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIPO. 2003. Intellectual Property (IP) Rights and Innovation in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Retrieved from (https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sme/en/documents/pdf/iprs_innovation.pdf).
   Google Scholar