Does ambidexterity consistency benefit small and medium-sized enterprises’ resilience?

References

• Altman, E., & Sabato, G. (2007). Modelling credit risk for SMEs: Evidence from the US market. Abacus, 43(3), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annarelli, A., & Nonino, F. (2016). Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega, 62, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2011). Do phoenix miracles exist? Firm-level evidence from financial crises. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, L. J., III, & Singh, J. V. (1983). Organizational slack and political behavior among top management teams. Academy of management proceedings, 1983(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1983.4976315.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certo, S. T., Busenbark, J. R., Kalm, M., & LePine, J. A. (2020). Divided we fall: How ratios undermine research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 23(2), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118773455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conz, E., & Magnani, G. (2020). A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research. European Management Journal, 38(3), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolz, C., Iborra, M., & Safón, V. (2019). Improving the likelihood of SME survival during financial and economic crises: The importance of TMTs and family ownership for ambidexterity. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R.H. Killman, L.R. Pondy, & D. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization (vol. 1, pp. 167–188). New York: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, R., & Vaara, E. (2009). Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebben, J. J., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 1249–1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essen, M., Strike, V. M., Carney, M., & Sapp, S. (2015). The resilient family firm: Stakeholder outcomes and institutional effects. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Central Bank. (2019). Survey on the access to finance of enterprises in the Euro area. October 2018 to March 2019. https://www.ecb.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• García‐Teruel, P. J., & Martínez‐Solano, P. (2007). Effects of working capital management on SME profitability. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 3(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130710738718
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & D’Aveni, R. (1988). Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillmann, J. (2020). Disciplines of organizational resilience: Contributions, critiques, and future research avenues. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 879–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00384-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2020). Organizational resilience: A valuable construct for management research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersson, M. (2013). Patent management in entrepreneurial SMEs: A literature review and an empirical study of innovation appropriation, patent propensity, and motives. R&d Management, 43(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00700.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iborra, M., Safón, V., & Dolz, C. (2020). What explains resilience of SMEs? Ambidexterity capability and strategic consistency. Long Range Planning, 53(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indrawati, H., Caska, & Suarman. (2020). Barriers to technological innovations of SMEs: How to solve them? International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(5), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2020-0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefy, M. A., Harrison, J. S., Sirmon, D. G., & Carnes, C. (2017). Living and dying: Synthesizing the literature on firm survival and failure across stages of development. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 770–799. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junni, P., Sarala, R., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberg, J., Tikkanen, H., Nokelainen, T., & Suur-Inkeroinen, H. (2009). Competitive dynamics, strategic consistency, and organizational survival. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampel, J., Shamsie, J., & Shapira, Z. (2009). Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. Organization Science, 20(5), 835–845. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003691287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, T., Rajwani, T., & Reinmoeller, P. (2012). Do you have a survival instinct? Leveraging genetic codes to achieve fit in hostile business environments. Business Horizons, 55(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, V. (2020). Performance, working capital management, and the liability of smallness: A question of opportunity costs? Journal of Small Business Management, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1735252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Beck, T. E. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management, 31(5), 738–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. S., & Dang, V. T. (2017). Untangling the relationship between strategic consistency and organizational performance: An empirical analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(4), 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U‐shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017). Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger, J., Raisch, S., & Schimmer, M. (2018). Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: The contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organization Science, 29(3), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid‐Guijarro, A., Garcia, D., & Van Auken, H. (2009). Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid-Guijarro, A., García-pérez-de-lema, D., & Van Auken, H. (2016). Financing constraints and SME innovation during economic crises. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 29(1), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-04-2015-0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (2006). Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, S., Mitter, C., & Aichmayr, A. (2017). Corporate crisis and sustainable reorganization: Evidence from bankrupt Austrian SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness, G., Hogan, T., & Powell, R. (2018). European trade credit use and SME survival. Journal of Corporate Finance, 49(April), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T. W. (2011). Organizational exploration and exploitation in high-tech industries: Magnitude, balance and strategic consistency [PhD Dissertation]. Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T. W., Payne, G. T., & Moore, C. B. (2014). Strategic consistency of exploration and exploitation in family businesses. Family Business Review, 27(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513504434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, V. (2010). Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.2307/256998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., III, & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(2008), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osiyevskyy, O., Shirokova, G., & Ritala, P. (2020). Exploration and exploitation in crisis environment: Implications for level and variability of firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 114(June), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, R., Torstensson, H., & Mattila, H. (2014). Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises- an empirical study of Swedish textile and clothing SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(January), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). Exploration and exploitation and firm performance variability: A study of ambidexterity in entrepreneurial firms. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 12(4), 1147–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0387-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, H., & Ameen, K. (2018). The role of resilience capabilities in shaping how firms respond to disruptions. Journal of Business Research, 88(July), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Hotz, F. (2008). Shaping the context for learning: Corporate alignment initiatives, environmental munificence, and firm performance. In S. Wall, C. Zimmermann, R. Klingebiel, & D. Lange (Eds.), Strategic reconfigurations: Building dynamic capabilities (pp. 62–85). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A., & Raisch, S. (2013). Corporate turnarounds: The duality of retrenchment and recovery. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1216–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2002). Evolution toward fit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 125–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U. (2016). Two-lines: The first valid test of U-shaped relationships [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U. (2018). Two lines: A valid alternative to the invalid testing of U-shaped relationships with quadratic regressions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 538–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918805755
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallbone, D., Deakins, D., Battisti, M., & Kitching, J. (2012). Small business responses to a major economic downturn: Empirical perspectives from New Zealand and the United Kingdom. International Small Business Journal, 30(7), 754–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612448077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S., Pan, W., & Wang, L. L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tognazzo, A., Gubitta, P., & Favaron, S. D. (2016). Does slack always affect resilience? A study of quasi-medium-sized Italian firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(9–10), 768–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1250820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbano, C., & Venturini, K. (2013). Managing risks in SMEs: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(3), 186–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000400017
   Google Scholar
• Weaven, S., Quach, S., Thaichon, P., Frazer, L., Billot, K., & Grace, D. (2021). Surviving an economic downturn: Dynamic capabilities of SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 128(May), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenke, K., Zapkau, F. B., & Schwens, C. (2021). Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance. Journal of Business Research, 132(August), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., Stanske, S., & Lieberman, M. B. (2020). Strategic responses to crisis. Strategic Management Journal, 41(April). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3161
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Where to from here? EO-as-Experimentation. Failure, and distribution of outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017). Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 733–769. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, E. J., Kraatz, M. S., & Bresser, R. K. (2000). Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<429::AID-SMJ81>3.0.CO;2-%23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, A., Hill, S. A., Birkinshaw, J., & Jaeckel, M. (2020). Complements or substitutes? A microfoundations perspective on the interplay between drivers of ambidexterity in SMEs. Long Range Planning, 53(6), 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar