An evaluation of the effectiveness of innovation ecosystems in facilitating the adoption of sustainable entrepreneurship

References

• Abotah, R., & Daim, T. U. (2017). Towards building a multi perspective policy development framework for transition into renewable energy. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 21, 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu, A. (2020). Gender and innovation: Implications for sustainable development. a GenderInSITE policy brief. Academy of Science of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). Why did the West extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1167–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• African Economic Outlook. (2017). Entrepreneurship and Industrialisation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/aeo-2017-en
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N., & Hoffmann, A. N. (2008). A framework for addressing and measuring entrepreneurship. OECD Statistics Working Paper, 2. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090374
   Google Scholar
• Al-Atawneh, M. (2009). Is Saudi Arabia a theocracy? Religion and governance in contemporary Saudi Arabia. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(5), 721–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanazi, H. A., Daim, T. U., & Kocaoglu, D. F. (2015, August). Identify the best alternatives to help the diffusion of teleconsultation by using the hierarchical decision model (HDM). In 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) IEEE, 422–432.
   Google Scholar
• Albats, E., Podmetina, D., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2021). Open innovation in SMEs: A process view towards business model innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoros, J. E., & Bosma, N. (2014). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2013 global report. Recovered on February 28, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Arbetman, M., & Johnson, K. (2008, March 26–29). Relative political capacity: Empirical and theoretical underpinnings. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Arruda, C., Nogueira, V. S., & Costa, V. (2013). The Brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem of startups: An analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil as seen from the OECD pillars. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 2(3), 17–57.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems. The Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 204–288). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayers, W. (2004). Teaching toward freedom: Moral commitment and ethical action in the classroom. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakry, D., Khalifa, R., & Dabab, M. (2019, August). The effectiveness of entrepreneurship programs to reduce unemployment in developing countries: The case of Saudi Arabia. In 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) IEEE, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Behavioural Insights Team (2021). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, fromhttps://www.bi.team/
   Google Scholar
• Belz, F. M., & Binder, J. K. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, S., Sharma, D., & Kaushal, D. (2020). Relationship between cultural social norms and availability of entrepreneurial funding: Mediating effect of government policies, priorities, support and ease of doing business. International Journal of Management, 11(9), 803–820. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3711221
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, P. (2019). Knowledge diversity and entrepreneurship following an economic crisis: An empirical study of regional resilience in Great Britain. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(5–6), 496–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, T. (2020). What do we know about the university contribution to regional economic development? A conceptual framework. International Regional Science Review, 0160017620909538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. (2011). Factors affecting the efficiency of the BRICSs’ national innovation systems: A comparative study based on DEA and panel data analysis. In Economics discussion paper (2011-52). Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Stamati, D., & Valvi, T. (2019). Social business model innovation: A quadruple/quintuple helix-based social innovation ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(1), 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerna, L. (2013). The nature of policy change and implementation: A review of different theoretical approaches. In Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) report, 492–502 (pp. 1–31). Paris, France: OECD/CERI. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L. (2013). Developing a strategic policy choice framework for technological innovation: case of Chinese pharmaceuticals [Doctoral dissertation]. Portland State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, D. S., Ryan, P., & Buciuni, G. (2021). Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: A research pathway. Small Business Economics, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. Elsevier Science Regional Sales.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, C., Axtell, C., Damodaran, L., Farbey, B., Hull, R., Lloyd-Jones, R., … Tomlinson, C. (1997). Information technology: A study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors. Ergonomics, 40(9), 851–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., & Alexander, D. (2009). Networks, innovation and public policy: Politicians, bureaucrats and the pathways to change inside government. Springer, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dabić, M., González-Loureiro, M., & Daim, T. U. (2015). Unraveling the attitudes on entrepreneurial universities: The case of Croatian and Spanish universities. Technology in Society, 42, 167–178.
   Google Scholar
• Daim, T., & Ozdemir, D. (2015). Impact of US economic crises on university R&D investments. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 6(1), 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources (2020). The Australian government has found Australian Innovation System Monitor. [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australian-innovation-system-monitor
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2013). StartX and the ‘paradox of success’: Filling the gap in Stanford’s entrepreneurial culture. Social Science Information, 52(4), 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The entrepreneurial university: Vision and metrics. Industry and Higher Education, 30(2), 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinha, L., & Ferreira, J. J. (2017). Metrics for Innovation and entrepreneurial networks. In Gewerbestrasse (Ed.), Industry 4.0: Entrepreneurship and structural change in the new digital landscape (pp. 349–368). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018). Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 401–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellately, R. (2002). Backing Hitler: Consent and coercion in Nazi Germany. OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Giadedi, A., & Daim, T. (2018, June). Evaluate and score knowledge management activities and their implementation during a project lifecycle using (HDM). In 2018 IEEE technology and engineering management conference (TEMSCON) IEEE, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., & Daim, T. U. (2016, September). A measurement system for science and engineering research center performance evaluation. In 2016 Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology (PICMET) IEEE, 2782–2792.
   Google Scholar
• Grobbelaar, S. S. (2018). Developing a local innovation ecosystem through a university coordinated innovation platform: The university of fort hare. Development Southern Africa, 35(5), 657e672. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2017.1421902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., & Martínez‐Chávez, M. (2020). Aligning regional and business strategies: Looking inside the Basque Country entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(5), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22162
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gür, U., Oylumlu, I. S., & Kunday, Ö. (2017). Critical assessment of entrepreneurial and innovative universities index of Turkey: Future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurr, T. R. (1988). War, revolution, and the growth of the coercive state. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2018). Entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem’s drivers: The role of higher education organizations. In J. Leitão, H. Alves, N Krueger, et al. (Eds.), Entrepreneurial, innovative and sustainable ecosystems (pp. 109–128). Applying Quality of Life Research (Best Practices). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, M., & Coduras, A. (2019). The national entrepreneurship framework conditions in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study of GEM data/national expert surveys for South Africa, Angola, Mozambique and Madagascar. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A., & Ahmad, N. (2007). A framework for addressing and measuring entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Indicators Steering Group.
   Google Scholar
• Innovate UK (2021). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/innovate-uk/about
   Google Scholar
• The Innovation Policy Platform (IPP) (2021a). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://svc.com.sa/
   Google Scholar
• The Innovation Policy Platform (IPP) (2021b). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/about/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, N., Khan, A., Gill, A. S., & Abbas, Q. (2020). Nexus between sustainable entrepreneurship and environmental pollution: Evidence from developing economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(29), 36242–36253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, F., Fayolle, A., & Wuilaume, A. (2018). Researching bricolage in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3–4), 450–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalar, B., & Antoncic, B. (2015). The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation, 36, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanam, M., & Daim, T. (2021). A market diffusion potential (MDP) assessment model for residential energy efficient (EE) technologies in the US. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 110968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M., & Sautet, F. (2006). The nature and role of entrepreneurship in markets: Implications for policy. Mercatus Policy Series Policy Primer, (4), 27.
   Google Scholar
• Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change-key strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komiyama, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: Building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4
   Google Scholar
• Kshetri, N. (2014). Developing successful entrepreneurial ecosystems: Lessons from a comparison of an Asian tiger and a Baltic tiger. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(3), 330–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugler, J., & Tammen, R. L. (Eds.). (2012). The performance of nations. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2014). Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57(1), 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafuente, E., Ács, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2021). A composite indicator analysis for optimizing entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 104379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafuente, E., Szerb, L., & Acs, Z. J. (2016). Country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship: A data envelopment analysis approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1260–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, A., Hüsig, S., & Albert, M. (2021). How frugal innovation and inclusive business are linked to tackle low-income markets. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, J., Daim, T., & Carayanni, E. (2020). Technology transfer evaluation: Driving organizational changes through a hierarchical scoring model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Hallak, R., & Sardeshmukh, S. R. (2016). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and restaurant performance: A higher-order structural model. Tourism Management, 53, 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, E., Bendickson, J., Solomon, S., & McDowell, W. C. (2019). Development of a multi-dimensional measure for assessing entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31, 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (2005). Science, technology and innovation policy. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 599–631.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, H. (2018). Foreign direct investment, domestic investment and oil price nexus in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (IJEEP).
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. (1997). Technology and economic development: the dynamics of local, regional, and national change. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2006). Design, ethics and sustainability. Guidelines for a transition phase. University of Art and Design Helsinki (June).
   Google Scholar
• Marcotte, C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurship at the country level: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(3–4), 174–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris, 30(1), 77–102.
   Google Scholar
• Matricano, D. (2020). The effect of R&D investments, highly skilled employees, and patents on the performance of Italian innovative startups. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(10), 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1757057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzembacher, D. E., Raudsaar, M., Barcellos, M. D. D., & Mets, T. (2020). Business models’ innovations to overcome hybridity-related tensions in sustainable entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 12(11), 4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavi, R. K. (2014). Indicators of entrepreneurial university: Fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 370–387.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland. (2021). Public research, development and innovation (RDI) funding. [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://tem.fi/en/research-development-and-innovation-funding
   Google Scholar
• Misk Innovation. (2021). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://misk.org.sa/innovation/our-story/
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W., & Muysken, J. (2010). Full employment abandoned: Shifting sands and policy failures. International Journal of Public Policy, 5(4), 295–313.
   Google Scholar
• Mont, O., & Lindhqvist, T. (2003). The role of public policy in advancement of product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(8), 905–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, J. G., & Villarreal, E. (2001). Breaking down structural barriers to innovation in traditional universities. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 61.
   Google Scholar
• Moroccan Center for Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship (2021). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://www.mcise.org/
   Google Scholar
• Moshashai, D., Leber, A. M., & Savage, J. D. (2020). Saudi Arabia plans for its economic future: Vision 2030, the National transformation plan and Saudi fiscal reform. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 47(3), 381–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, F., & Budden, P. (2017). A systematic MIT approach for assessing ‘innovation-driven entrepreneurship’ in ecosystems (iEcosystems). Working paper Published by MIT’s Laboratory for Innovation Science & Policy. Retrieved August 17, 2021, from https://innovation.mit.edu/assets/BuddenMurray_Assessing-iEcosystems-Working-Paper_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Planning Commission. (2013). National development plan vision 2030.
   Google Scholar
• The National Program for Small and Medium Enterprises (2021). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://sme.ly/en/about
   Google Scholar
• Neumeyer, X., & Santos, S. C. (2018). Sustainable business models, venture typologies, and entrepreneurial ecosystems: A social network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4565–4579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, P. C., Afonso, O., Silva, D., & Sochirca, E. (2021). The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis. Economic Modelling, 97, 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg, A. J., Moliterno, T. P., Hale, D., Jr, & Lepak, D. P. (2014). Resource-based perspectives on unit-level human capital: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 40(1), 316–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, G., Farny, S., & Hakala, H. (2021). The buzz before business: A design science study of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1097–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). Measuring entrepreneurship: A collection of indicators (2009 ed.). Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1581491
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, J. (2012). Principles of politics: A rational choice theory guide to politics and social justice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, I. (2006). Bureaucracy, tax system, and economic performance. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(5), 839–862.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, V., & Springer, S. (2018). What does “Diversity” mean for public engagement in science? A new metric for innovation ecosystem diversity. Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 22(3), 184–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., Pickernell, D., & Thomas, B. (2010). Attitudes towards entrepreneurship education: A comparative analysis. Education + Training, 52(8/9), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011088926
   Google Scholar
• Pidduck, R. J., & Clark, D. R. (2021). Transitional entrepreneurship: Elevating research into marginalized entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E. (2015). Strategic organizational behavior (STROBE): The missing voice in the strategic human capital conversation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(3), 342–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince Mohammad Bin Salman College (MBSC). (2021). Retrieved Feb 08, 2021, https://www.mbsc.edu.sa/aboutus
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, R. (2008). The growing supranational impacts of the OECD and the EU on national educational policies, and the case of Finland. Policy Futures in Education, 6(6), 665–680.
   Google Scholar
• Riviezzo, A., Santos, S. C., Liñán, F., Napolitano, M. R., & Fusco, F. (2019). European universities seeking entrepreneurial paths: The moderating effect of contextual variables on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 232–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. L., & Dale, R. (2015). Towards a ‘critical cultural political economy’ account of the globalising of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(1), 149–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, M. A., Ricart, J. E., & Sanchez, P. (2002). Sustainable development and the sustainability of competitive advantage: A dynamic and sustainable view of the firm. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(3), 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Rüdiger, K., Peris Ortiz, M., & Blanco González, A. (2013). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic crisis: Lessons for research, policy and practice (2014th ed., p. 186). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02384-7
   Google Scholar
• Saudi Data and AI Authority (SDAIA) (2021). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://sdaia.gov.sa/?Lang=en&page=SectionAchievements#
   Google Scholar
• Saudi Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Lab (SEE Lab) (2021). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://seelab.sa.com/en/about
   Google Scholar
• Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2021). Digital marketing in SMEs via data-driven strategies: Reviewing the current state of research. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SBIR and STTR. (2021). The SBIR and STTR Programs. [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, from https://www.sbir.gov/about
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, S. (2021). Spatialities of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, e12591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, N. J. (2013). Assessment of solar photovoltaic technologies using multiple perspectives and hierarchical decision modeling [Doctoral dissertation]. Portland State University.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, F., Ge, B., Zhang, S., & Liu, X. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship guided by policy support in a transitional economy: A research based on a Chinese high-tech enterprise. In Sustainability in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: Operating mechanisms and enterprise growth (pp. 276–301). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3495-3.ch013
   Google Scholar
• Simatupang, T. M., Schwab, A., & Lantu, D. (2015). Introduction: Building sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystems (2015). International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26(4), 389–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161598
   Google Scholar
• Small and Medium Enterprise Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2021). Taiwan Social Innovation Entrepreneurship. [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://startup.sme.gov.tw/innovation
   Google Scholar
• Somsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014). A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szirmai, A., Naudé, W., & Goedhuys, M. (Eds.). (2011). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taatila, V. P. (2010). Learning entrepreneurship in higher education. Education + Training.
   Google Scholar
• Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center (TIEC). (2021). [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://tiec.gov.eg/English/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Todorovic, Z. W., McNaughton, R. B., & Guild, P. (2011). ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities. Technovation, 31(2–3), 128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornatzky, L. G., & Rideout, E. C. (2014). Innovation U 2.0: Reinventing university roles in a knowledge economy. Innovation-U. com.
   Google Scholar
• Trade Commissioner Service. (2021). Canadian International Innovation Program. [Online]. Retrieved February 8, 2021, https://www.tradecommissioner.gc.ca/funding-financement/ciip-pcii/index.aspx?lang=eng
   Google Scholar
• Tsurumi, K. (2015). Social change and the individual: Japan before and after defeat in World War II. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, R. C. (1992). Stalin in Power: The revolution from above, 1928-1941. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Turró, A., Urbano, D., & Peris-Ortiz, M. (2014). Culture and innovation: The moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 360–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda, K., Takenaka, T., Váncza, J., & Monostori, L. (2009). Value creation and decision-making in sustainable society. CIRP Annals, 58(2), 681–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uvarova, I., Mavlutova, I., & Atstaja, D. (2021). Development of the green entrepreneurial mindset through modern entrepreneurship education. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 628(1), 12034. IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Van Den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, P. (2013, April). The employment outlook for youth: Building entrepreneurship ecosystems as a way forward. In Conference Proceedings of the G20 Youth Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Volkmann, C., Fichter, K., Klofsten, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2019). Sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: An emerging field of research. Small Business Economics, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., He, Q., Xia, S., Sarpong, D., Xiong, A., & Maas, G. (2020). Capacities of business incubator and regional innovation performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, H. H. R., Chen, J. S., & Chen, P. C. (2015). Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustainability, 7(5), 4997–5026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Murphy, P. J., Chen, J. J., & Bunn, M. D. (2021). Institutional forces and knowledge search strategies as predictors of entrepreneurial venture performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef, A. B., Boubaker, S., & Omri, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship and sustainability: The need for innovative and institutional solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 232–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakieva, R. R., Kolmakov, V. V., Pavlyuk, A. V., Ling, V. V., Medovnikova, D. V., & Azieva, R. H. (2019). The significance of studying legal protection of rights on innovative creations: The case of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Argheyd, K., Molz, R., & He, B. (2021). A new business ecosystem for SMEs development in China: Key-node industry and industrial net. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar