Industry-relatedness, geographic proximity and strategic decisions of corporate and independent venture capital-backed companies

References

• Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/674021
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Garrido, E., & Dushnitsky, G. (2016). Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amor, S. B., & Kooli, M. (2020). Do M&A exits have the same effect on venture capital reputation than IPO exits? Journal of Banking & Finance, 111, 105704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anokhin, S., Örtqvist, D., Thorgren, S., & Wincent, J. (2011). Corporate venturing deal syndication and innovation: The information exchange paradox. Long Range Planning, 44(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Phelps, C., & Kotha, S. (2011). Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayar, O., & Chemmanur, T. J. (2011). IPOs versus acquisitions and the valuation premium puzzle: A theory of exit choice by entrepreneurs and venture capitalists. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1755–1793. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109011000408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bena, J., & Li, K. (2014). Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 1923–1960. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34421969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., & Da Rin, M. (2002). Venture capital in Europe and the financing of innovative companies. Economic Policy, 17(34), 229–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00088
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., Colombo, M. G., Garrone, P., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological-and market-relatedness. Research Policy, 34(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cefis, E., Marsili, O., & Rigamonti, D. (2020). In and out of balance: Industry relatedness, learning capabilities and post-acquisition innovative performance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 210–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemmanur, T. J., Loutskina, E., & Tian, X. (2014). Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2434–2473. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2002). Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Business Review, 80(3), 90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006). Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy, 35(5), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., & Murtinu, S. (2017). Venture capital investments in Europe and portfolio firms’ economic performance: Independent versus corporate investors. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. J. (2012). Overcoming the current crunch in NPD resources. Product Innovation Best Practices Series, 17, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. J., McDonald, L., & Mills, D. S. (2000). The effect of increasing visual horizons on stereotypic weaving: Implications for the social housing of stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 69(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00115-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, D. (2012). The Oxford handbook of venture capital. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, D., & Johan, S. (2010). Venture capital investment duration. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 228–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00293.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G. (2006). Corporate venture capital: Past evidence and future directions. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G. (2012, September 18). Corporate venture capital in the twenty-first century: an integral part of firms' innovation toolkit. In D. Cumming (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of venture capital, Oxford handbooks. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391596.013.0006
   Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34(5), 615–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., & Shaver, J. M. (2009). Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10), 1045–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, H., Witt, P., & Brachtendorf, G. (2005). Corporate venture capital as a strategy for external innovation: An exploratory empirical study. R&D Management, 35(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A., & Mohamed, A. (2012). IPO survival in a reputational market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(3–4), 427–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2012.02280.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A., & Mohamed, A. (2015). VC investments and global exits. The European Journal of Finance, 21(7), 608–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2013.871736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Haleblian, J. (2002). Understanding acquisition performance: The role of transfer effects. Organization Science, 13(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.1.36.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitza, M., Matusik, S. F., & Mosakowski, E. (2009). Do VCs matter? The importance of owners on performance variance in start-up firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., King, C.,sIII, & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938–954. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulghieri, P., & Sevilir, M. (2009). Organization and financing of innovation, and the choice between corporate and independent venture capital. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(6), 1291–1321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109009990391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaba, V., & Meyer, A. D. (2008). Crossing the organizational species barrier: How venture capital practices infiltrated the information technology sector. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 976–998. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.34789671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giot, P., & Schwienbacher, A. (2007). IPOs, trade sales and liquidations: Modelling venture capital exits using survival analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(3), 679–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P. A. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1461–1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., Kovner, A., & Lerner, J. (2009). Specialization and success: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 817–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (1998). Venture capital distributions: Short-run and long-run reactions. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 2161–2183. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (1999). What drives venture capital fundraising? Technical report. National bureau of economic research.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler, I., & Guillen, M. F. (2010). Home country networks and foreign expansion: Evidence from the venture capital industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49389027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, B., Lou, Y., & Pérez-Castrillo, D. (2015). Investment, duration, and exit strategies for corporate and independent venture capital-backed start-ups. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 415–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., & Sapienza, H. J. (1992). Determinants of venture capital firms’ preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90012-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, J. R. (2005). The value relevance of financial statements in the venture capital market. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 613–648. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, B. (1999). Testing for linearity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(5), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00098
   Google Scholar
• Hellmann, T., Lindsey, L., & Puri, M. (2007). Building relationships early: Banks in venture capital. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 513–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herfert, K. F., & Arbige, M. V. (2008). Aligning an R&D portfolio with corporate strategy. Research-Technology Management, 51(5), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2008.11657524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashide, H., & Birley, S. (2002). The consequences of conflict between the venture capitalist and the entrepreneurial team in the United Kingdom from the perspective of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, A. (2020). Industry relatedness, FDI liberalization and the indigenous innovation process in China. Regional Studies, 54(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1623871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, V. I., & Xie, F. (2010). Do corporate venture capitalists add value to start-up firms? Evidence from IPOs and acquisitions of VC-backed companies. Financial Management, 39(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01068.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jindra, J., & Leshchinskii, D. (2015). Venture capital valuation, partial adjustment, and underpricing: Behavioral bias or information production? Financial Review, 50(2), 173–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12064
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. N., & Schoar, A. (2005). Private equity performance: Returns, persistence, and capital flows. The Journal of Finance, 60(4), 1791–1823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00780.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, T. (2004). Building external corporate venturing capability. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, N. M. (1988). Economic duration data and hazard functions. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(2), 646–679. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2726365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauterbach, R., Hass, L. H., & Schweizer, D. (2014). The impact of fund inflows on staging and investment behaviour. International Small Business Journal, 32(6), 644–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613500504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, E., Bender, M., Achleitner, A.-K., & Kaserer, C. (2013). Importance of spatial proximity between venture capital investors and investees in Germany. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2346–2354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan, I. C., & Block, Z. (1993). Corporate venturing: Creating new businesses within the firm. Harvard Business School Press Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823–1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masulis, R. W., & Nahata, R. (2011). Venture capital conflicts of interest: Evidence from acquisitions of venture-backed firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(2), 395–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109010000827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, T., & Mathonet, P.-Y. (2005). Beyond the J curve: Managing a portfolio of venture capital and private equity funds (Vol. 313). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nahata, R. (2004). The determinants of venture capital exits: An empirical analysis of VC-backed portfolio companies. working thesis, Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, J. E., & Sampson, R. C. (2004). The scope and governance of international r&d alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 723–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, R., & Barnes, S. (2006). Raising venture capital. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Phan, P. H., Wright, M., Ucbasaran, D., & Tan, W.-L. (2009). Corporate entrepreneurship: Current research and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piscitello, L. (2004). Corporate diversification, coherence and economic performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5), 757–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommet, S. (2013). The impact of venture capital investment duration on the survival of French IPOs.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, A. B., & Stegemoller, M. (2008). Moving from private to public ownership: Selling out to public firms versus initial public offerings. Financial Management, 37(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2008.00005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. T. (2008). Strategic alliances and the boundaries of the firm. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 649–681. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, structure, and economic performance.
   Google Scholar
• Sahaym, A., Cho, S. Y., Kim, S. K., & Mousa, F.-T. (2016). Mixed blessings: How top management team heterogeneity and governance structure influence the use of corporate venture capital by post-IPO firms. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1208–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, J., & Hoetker, G. (2014). Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, A. (1990). Value creation in acquisitions: A re-examination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddaiah, T. (2011). Financial services. Pearson Education India.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, R., Siegel, E., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Corporate venture capitalists: Autonomy, obstacles, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(88)90017-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. S. (1999). Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Science, 45(8), 1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., Pedace, R., & Sathe, V. (2011). VC fund financial performance: The relative importance of IPO and M&A exits and exercise of abandonment options. Financial Management, 40(4), 1029–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2011.01170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588. https://doi.org/10.1086/321301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon, S., & Milosevic, D. Z. (2006). A two-way influence between business strategy and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(6), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00098-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis, L. (1995). Real options in capital investment: Models, strategies, and applications. Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tykvova, T. (2006). How do investment patterns of independent and captive private equity funds differ? evidence from Germany. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 20(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-006-0036-0
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & Noorderhaven, N. (2002). External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13(6), 714–733. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.714.496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalonga, B., & McGahan, A. M. (2005). The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 1183–1208. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. (2006). Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 819–835. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, J., & Smith, J. (1997). Better exits. The Journal of Private Equity, 1(2), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.1997.409667
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. A., & Wan, W. P. (2013). Explaining the variance in underpricing among venture capital-backed IPOs: A comparison between private and corporate VC firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C., & Dierkes, M. (2002). Risikokapitalgeber in Deutschland—Strukturmerkmale (Edition sigma), Entscheidungskriterien, Selbstverständnis. Berlin.
   Google Scholar