Organizational homophily of family firms: The case of family corporate venture capital

References

• Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Strategic renewal of organizations. Organization Science, 20(2), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aharonson, B. S., Baum, J. A. C., & Feldman, M. P. (2007). Desperately seeking spillovers? Increasing returns, industrial organization and the location of new entrants in geographic and technological space. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(1), 89–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. (2012). When can you safely ignore multicollinearity?. https://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity/
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Garrido, E., & Dushnitsky, G. (2016). Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amore, M. D., Murtinu, S., & Pelucco, V. (2023). Family firms in entrepreneurial finance: The case of corporate venture capital. CEPR discussion paper No. DP16159. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4474474
   Google Scholar
• Anokhin, S., Morgan, T., Schulze, W., & Wuebker, R. (2022). Is a reputation for misconduct harmful? Evidence from corporate venture capital. Journal of Business Research, 138, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anokhin, S., Örtqvist, D., Thorgren, S., & Wincent, J. (2011). Corporate venturing deal syndication and innovation: The information exchange paradox. Long Range Planning, 44(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arregle, J.-L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C. (2010). Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. American Journal of Epidemiology, 172(9), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & van Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Phelps, C. C., & Kotha, S. (2016). Search and integration in external venturing: An inductive examination of corporate venture capital units. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(2), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Phelps, C., & Kotha, S. (2011). Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00038-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., Rowley, T. J., Shipilov, A. V., & Chuang, Y.-T. (2005). Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 536–575. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellavitis, C., Rietveld, J., & Filatotchev, I. (2020). The effects of prior co‐investments on the performance of venture capitalist syndicates: A relational agency perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(2), 240–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2009). Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organization Science, 20(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoni, F., & Groh, A. P. (2014). Cross-border investments and venture capital exits in Europe. Corporate Governance an International Review, 22(2), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen, J., Impink, S. M., Reichensperger, L., & Seamans, R. (2022). The role of data for AI startup growth. Research Policy, 51(5), 104513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BioNTech. (2024, January 30). The history of BioNtech - the road to a new era of immunotherapy. https://www.biontech.com/int/en/home/about/who-we-are/history.html
   Google Scholar
• Block, J., Fisch, C., Vismara, S., & Andres, R. (2019). Private equity investment criteria: An experimental conjoint analysis of venture capital, business angels, and family offices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., Da Rin, M., & Hellmann, T. (2016). The importance of trust for investment: Evidence from venture capital. Review of Financial Studies, 29(9), 2283–2318. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brander, J. A., Amit, R., & Antweiler, W. (2002). Venture-capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. The value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(3), 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2002.00423.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braune, E., Lantz, J.-S., Sahut, J., & Teulon, F. (2021). Corporate venture capital in the it sector and relationships in VC syndication networks. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1221–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00264-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygrave, W. D. (1987). Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90004-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calanni, J. C., Siddiki, S. N., Weible, C. M., & Leach, W. D. (2015). Explaining coordination in collaborative partnerships and clarifying the scope of the belief homophily hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 901–927. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmon, A. F., Miller, A. N., Raile, A. N., & Roers, M. M. (2010). Fusing family and firm: Employee perceptions of perceived homophily, organizational justice, organizational identification, and organizational commitment in family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(4), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Casamatta, C., & Haritchabalet, C. (2007). Experience, screening and syndication in venture capital investments. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(3), 368–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, S., Dhir, A., Ferraris, A., & Bertoldi, B. (2021). Trust and reputation in family businesses: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Journal of Business Research, 137, 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemmanur, T. J., Loutskina, E., & Tian, X. (2014). Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2434–2473. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirico, F., Welsh, D. H. B., Ireland, R. D., & Sieger, P. (2021). Family versus non‐family firm franchisors: Behavioural and performance differences. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1%3C1::AID-SMJ63%3E3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claes, K., & Vissa, B. (2020). Does social similarity pay off? Homophily and venture capitalists’ deal valuation, downside risk protection, and financial returns in India. Organization Science, 31(3), 576–603. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet, F., & Philippe, D. (2014). From hot cakes to cold feet: A contingent perspective on the relationship between market uncertainty and status homophily in the formation of alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 406–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A. (2016). The impact of local knowledge bases on the creation of innovative start-ups in Italy. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9722-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., & Murtinu, S. (2017). Venture capital investments in Europe and portfolio firms’ economic performance: Independent versus corporate investors. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, D. (2006). The determinants of venture capital portfolio size: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Business, 79(3), 1083–1126. https://doi.org/10.1086/500670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, D., Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2017). Governmental and independent venture capital investments in Europe: A firm-level performance analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, D., Knill, A., & Syvrud, K. (2016). Do international investors enhance private firm value? Evidence from venture capital. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1984). Convenient specification tests for logit and probit models. Journal of Econometrics, 25(3), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90001-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, J., Gomez-Mejia, L., & Martin, G. (2023). Family firms and employee pension underfunding: Good corporate citizens or unethical opportunists? Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05533-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq, D., Sapienza, H. J., & Zaheer, A. (2008). Firm and group influences on venture capital firms’ involvement in new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1169–1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00764.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., Eddleston, K. A., & Rovelli, P. (2021). Entrepreneurial by design: How organizational design affects family and non‐family firms’ opportunity exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 27–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2013). Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimov, D., & De Clercq, D. (2006). Venture capital investment strategy and portfolio failure rate: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Q. (2016). Birds of a feather or celebrating differences? The formation and impacts of venture capital syndication. Journal of Empirical Finance, 39, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, P., & Mingo, S. (2022). Publicly-listed family-controlled firms and corporate venture capital: A socioemotional wealth approach. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 14337. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.14337abstract
   Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., & Lavie, D. (2010). How alliance formation shapes corporate venture capital investment in the software industry: A resource-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(1), 22–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Research Policy, 34(5), 615–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, H., Witt, P., & Brachtendorf, G. (2005). Corporate venture capital as a strategy for external innovation: An exploratory empirical study. R&D Management, 35(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertug, G., Brennecke, J., Kovács, B., & Zou, T. (2022). What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 38–69. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertug, G., Gargiulo, M., Galunic, C., & Zou, T. (2018). Homophily and individual performance. Organization Science, 29(5), 912–930. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, H., Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., & Tang, L. (2021). Narrow‐framing and risk preferences in family and non‐family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 201–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrary, M. (2010). Syndication of venture capital investment: The art of resource pooling. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2006). What you are is what you like—similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 802–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghinoi, S., De Vita, R., Steiner, B., & Sinatra, A. (2023). Family firm network strategies in regional clusters: Evidence from Italy. Small Business Economics, 62(1), 87–103. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00755-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giot, P., & Schwienbacher, A. (2007). IPOs, trade sales and liquidations: Modelling venture capital exits using survival analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(3), 679–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez‐Mejía, L. R., Sanchez‐Bueno, M. J., Miroshnychenko, I., Wiseman, R. M., Muñoz‐Bullón, F., & De Massis, A. (2023). Family control, political risk and employment security: A cross‐national study. Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Takács Haynes, K., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., Kovner, A., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2008). Venture capital investment cycles: The impact of public markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2000). The determinants of corporate venture capital success: Organizational structure, incentives, and complementarities. In R. K. Morck (Ed.), Concentrated corporate ownership (pp. 17–54). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., & Mollick, E. (2017). Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 341–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216678847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2015). New technology-based firms in Europe: Market penetration, public venture capital and timing of investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(5), 1109–1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, T., Schmeiss, J., & Stubner, S. (2019). Unmasking smart capital: How corporate venture capital units configure value-adding services. Research-Technology Management, 62(4), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2019.1613117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde, D., & Tumlinson, J. (2014). Does social proximity enhance business partnerships? Theory and evidence from ethnicity’s role in U.S. venture capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2355–2380. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero, I., Hughes, M., & Larrañeta, B. (2022). Is blood thicker than water? Exploring the impact of family firms’ familial social relations with other firms within their industries. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, Y. V., Lindsey, L. A., & Westerfield, M. M. (2015). Resource accumulation through economic ties: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 118(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2007). Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 251–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01207.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, C., & Rieder, F. (2011). What drives venture capital syndication? Applied Economics, 43(23), 3089–3102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840903427257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, C., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2004). Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, F. (2006). The complicating factor of life cycles in corporate venturing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 831–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, P., & Morris, M. W. (2007). Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the “life of the party”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 558–585. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.4.558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intihar, A., & Pollack, J. M. (2012). Exploring small family‐owned firms’ competitive ability. Journal of Family Business Management, 2(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/20436231211216439
   Google Scholar
• Istipliler, B., Ahrens, J.-P., Bort, S., & Isaak, A. (2023). Is exposure to the family firm always good for the next CEO? How successor pre-succession firm experience affects post-succession performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 167, 114179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jääskeläinen, M. (2012). Venture capital syndication: Synthesis and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 444–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00325.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., & Rau, S. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2004). Characteristics, contracts, and actions: Evidence from venture capitalist analyses. The Journal of Finance, 59(5), 2177–2210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, T., Maula, M. V., & Wilson, C. (2010). Unique resources of corporate venture capitalists as a key to entry into rigid venture capital syndication networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00366.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempers, M., Leitterstorf, M. P., & Kammerlander, N. (2019). Risk behavior of family firms: A literature review, framework, and research agenda. In E. Memili & C. Dibrell (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of heterogeneity among family firms (pp. 431–460). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, W. R., Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2014). Entrepreneurship as experimentation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W., & Higgins, M. C. (2007). Where do alliances come from? The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Research Policy, 36(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y., & Park, H. D. (2021). The influence of venture capital syndicate size on venture performance. Venture Capital, 23(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2021.1893933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T., & Marler, L. (2022). Are non-blood related “family” members treated differently? Determinants of bifurcation bias among family members in the family firm. Journal of Family Business Management, 12(1), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-06-2020-0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. A. (2015). An enhanced trust propagation approach with expertise and homophily-based trust networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 82, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. E., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science, 24(5), 1316–1336. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., Gilsing, V. A., & Krijkamp, A. R. (2019). From homophily through embeddedness to strategy: The role of network accuracy in partner selection choices. Long Range Planning, 52(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, C. N. V., Ivanov, V. I., Masulis, R. W., & Singh, A. K. (2011). Venture capital reputation, post-IPO performance, and corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(5), 1295–1333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109011000251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, N. H., Butler, F., & Roundy, P. (2017). Family firms and corporate social responsibility: Exploring “concerns”. Journal of Strategy and Management, 10(4), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2016-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, B. S., & Shah, N. P. (2020). Homophily: Measures and meaning. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 513–597. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2006). Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 19(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00060.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Lee, K. J., & Nagarajan, N. J. (2014). Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonhardt, J. M., Pezzuti, T., & Namkoong, J.-E. (2020). We’re not so different: Collectivism increases perceived homophily, trust, and seeking user-generated product information. Journal of Business Research, 112, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. (1994). The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management, 23(3), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. Z., Whitener, E. M., & Cross, R. (2006). Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1163–1171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Vertinsky, I., & Li, J. (2014). National distances, international experience, and venture capital investment performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., & Deng, L. (2009). Do birds of a feather flock higher? The effects of partner similarity on innovation in strategic alliances in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1005–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00842.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, D., Mattingly, E. S., Kushev, T. N., Ahuja, M. K., & Manikas, A. S. (2022). The role of socioemotional wealth in entrepreneurial persistence decisions for family businesses. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(3), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.34614
   Google Scholar
• Ma, D., Rhee, M., & Yang, D. (2013). Power source mismatch and the effectiveness of interorganizational relations: The case of venture capital syndication. The Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 711–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manigart, S., Lockett, A., Meuleman, M., Wright, M., Landström, H., Bruining, H., Desbrières, P., & Hommel, U. (2006). Venture capitalists’ decision to syndicate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00115.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, A., Carlei, V., & Baldassari, C. (2020). Exploring networks of proximity for partner selection, firms’ collaboration and knowledge exchange. The case of clean‐tech industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1034–1044. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52(3), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, M., Wright, M., Manigart, S., & Lockett, A. (2009). Private equity syndication: Agency costs, reputation and collaboration. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(5–6), 616–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. (2013). Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Lee, J., Chang, S., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2009). Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs non-family technology firms in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 802–817. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Steier, L., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minola, T., Kammerlander, N., Kellermanns, F. W., & Hoy, F. (2021). Corporate entrepreneurship and family business: Learning across domains. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miroshnychenko, I., De Massis, A., Miller, D., & Barontini, R. (2021). Family business growth around the world. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 682–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720913028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miroshnychenko, I., Vocalelli, G., De Massis, A., Grassi, S., & Ravazzolo, F. (2023). The COVID-19 pandemic and family business performance. Small Business Economics, 62(1), 213–241. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00766-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, C. B., Payne, G. T., Bell, R. G., & Davis, J. L. (2015). Institutional distance and cross-border venture capital investment flows. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahata, R. (2008). Venture capital reputation and investment performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 90(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, G., & Vu, L. (2021). Does venture capital syndication affect mergers and acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nörthemann, A. (2022). Industry-specific specialization in venture capitalists’ internationalization decisions. Journal of Business Economics. Advance online publication. 93(5), 891–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01129-1
   Google Scholar
• NRG Metrics. (2023). Family firms dataset 2023. https://nrgmetrics.com/datasets/
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., LiPuma, J. A., & Park, S. S. (2019). Concentrating too hard? Foreign and corporate venture capital involvement in syndicates. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(2), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. C. (2009). Can cognitive biases explain venture team homophily? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinelli, M., Chirico, F., De Massis, A., & Zattoni, A. (2023). Acquisition relatedness in family firms: Do the environment and the institutional context matter? Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plagmann, C., & Lutz, E. (2019a). Beggars or choosers? Lead venture capitalists and the impact of reputation on syndicate partner selection in international settings. Journal of Banking & Finance, 100, 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plagmann, C., & Lutz, E. (2019b). Better safe than sorry? The effect of trust on venture capitalists’ choice of syndicate partners. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 11(3), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2019.101354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen‐Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132–1205. https://doi.org/10.1086/421508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prügl, R., & Spitzley, D. I. (2021). Responding to digital transformation by external corporate venturing: An enterprising family identity and communication patterns perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raitis, J., Sasaki, I., & Kotlar, J. (2021). System‐spanning values work and entrepreneurial growth in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 104–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez‐Pasillas, M., Lundberg, H., & Nordqvist, M. (2021). Next generation external venturing practices in family owned businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 63–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 101–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, M. J., Katsikeas, C. S., & Bello, D. C. (2008). Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity. Organization Science, 19(4), 647–665. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., & Padula, G. (2008). Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organization Science, 19(5), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, M., Thrassou, A., & Vrontis, D. (2011). Financing innovation: Venture capital investments in biotechnology firms. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 6(4), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2011.045914
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sageder, M., Mitter, C., & Feldbauer‐Durstmüller, B. (2018). Image and reputation of family firms: A systematic literature review of the state of research. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 335–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0216-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ruiz, P., Daspit, J. J., Holt, D. T., & Rutherford, M. W. (2019). Family social capital in the family firm: A taxonomic classification, relationships with outcomes, and directions for advancement. Family Business Review, 32(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519836833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, A., Pandey, S., & Manalac, M. T. (2019). Family presence, family firm reputation and perceived financial performance: Empirical evidence from the Philippines. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapienza, H. J. (1992). When do venture capitalists add value? Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90032-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schickinger, A., Bertschi-Michel, A., & Kammerlander, N. (2022). Family offices as startup investors: A synergetic relationship of the old and new economy? In D. Lingelbach (Ed.), De Gruyter handbook of entrepreneurial finance (pp. 265–288). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726312-202
   Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588. https://doi.org/10.1086/321301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2008). Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 266–294. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.2.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souitaris, V., & Zerbinati, S. (2014). How do corporate venture capitalists do deals? An exploration of corporate investment practices. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(4), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, B., Butler, J. S., Garg, R., & Gibson, D. V. (2019). Austin, Boston, Silicon Valley, and New York: Case studies in the location choices of entrepreneurs in maintaining the Technopolis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L., Alexy, O., Block, J., & Sandner, P. G. (2016). The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures’ success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 393–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216637849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Wang, T. Y. (2014). Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tykvová, T., & Schertler, A. (2014). Does syndication with local venture capitalists moderate the effects of geographical and institutional distance? Journal of International Management, 20(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wholey, D. R., & Huonker, J. W. (1993). Effects of generalism and niche overlap on network linkages among youth service agencies. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/256526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2020). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (7th ed.). Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2003). The structure and management of alliances: Syndication in the venture capital industry. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2073–2102. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A. (2010). Harvesting family firms’ organizational social capital: A relational perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00894.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. P. (2019). Social structures, social relationships, and family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718792290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., Nordqvist, M., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Gupta, A. K., & Hallen, B. L. (2017). The conditional importance of prior ries: A group-level analysis of venture capital syndication. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1360–1386. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Fang, H., Dou, J., & Chrisman, J. J. (2022). Endogeneity issues in family business research: Current status and future recommendations. Family Business Review, 35(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211049092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840 to 1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-10420-001
   Google Scholar