461
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Academics and entrepreneurs: Enablers of hybrid identity centrality among university researchers

, &

References

  • Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
  • Alsos, G., Høyvarde, T., Hytti, U., & Solvoll, S. (2016). Entrepreneurs’ social identity and the preference of causal and effectual behaviours in start-up processes. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 28(3/4), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1155742
  • Alvesson, M., Lee Ashcraft, K., & Thomas, R. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407084426
  • Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
  • Balven, R., Fenters, F., Siegel, D., & Waldman, D. (2018). Academic entrepreneurship: The roles of identity, motivation, championing, education, work-life balance, and organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0127
  • Barrick, M. R., Thurgood, G. R., Smith, T. A., & Courtright, S. H. (2015). Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0227
  • Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1997). Cronbach’s alpha. British Medical Journal, 314(7), 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
  • Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2001). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6
  • Brewer, M., & Pierce, K. (2005). Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271710
  • Brousseau, K. R., Driver, M. J., Eneroth, K., & Larson, R. (1996). Career pandemonium: Realigning organizations and individuals. Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(4), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1996.3145319
  • Burke, P. J. (2006). Identity change. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900106
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Cunningham, J. A., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2022). The organizational architecture of entrepreneurial universities across the stages of entrepreneurship: A conceptual framework. Small Business Economics, 59(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00513-5
  • de Silva, M. (2016). Academic entrepreneurship and traditional academic duties: Synergy or rivalry? Studies in Higher Education, 41(12), 2169–2183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1029901
  • Denman, D. C., Baldwin, A. S., Betts, A. C., McQueen, A., & Tiro, J. A. (2018). Reducing “I don’t know” responses and missing survey data: Implications for measurement. Medical Decision Making, 38(6), 673–682.
  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
  • Eriksson, P., Hytti, U., Komulainen, K., Montonen, T., & Siivonen, P. (Eds.). (2021). New movements in academic entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  • Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix. University-industry-government innovation in action. Routledge.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Science Information, 52(3), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018413485832
  • Farrell, A. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.003
  • Feldmann, B. D. (2014). Dissonance in the academy: The formation of the faculty entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 20(5), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-08-2013-0124
  • Feola, F., Vesci, M., Botti, A., & Parente, R. (2019). The determinants of entrepreneurial intention of young researchers: Combining the theory of planned behavior with the triple helix model. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1424–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12361
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Gibb, A. (2012). Exploring the synergistic potential in entrepreneurial university development: Towards the building of a strategic framework. Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 16742. https://doi.org/10.3402/aie.v3i0.17211
  • Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9
  • Green, S. (1988). Strategy, organizational culture and symbolism. Long Range Planning, 21(4), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(88)90016-7
  • Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005
  • Guo, F., Restubog, S. L. D., Cui, L., Zou, B., & Choi, Y. (2019). What determines the entrepreneurial success of academics? Navigating multiple social identities in the hybrid career of academic entrepreneurs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.03.003
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Andersson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). InstitutionaL entrepreneurship and change in fields. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 261–280). Sage Publications.
  • Hashem, H. M., & Awad, G. H. (2021). Religious identity, discrimination, and psychological distress among Muslim and Christian Arab Americans. Journal of Religion & Health, 60(2), 961–973.
  • Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
  • Hayter, C. S., Fischer, B., & Rasmussen, E. (2021). Becoming an academic entrepreneur: How scientists develop an entrepreneurial identity. Small Business Economics, 59, 1469–1487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00585-3
  • He, H., & Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112473815
  • Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1–2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2919-1
  • Hytti, U. (2021). Introduction: Navigating the frontiers of entrepreneurial university research. In U. Hytti (Ed.), A research agenda for the entrepreneurial university (pp. 1–6). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007
  • Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change-key strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004
  • Lam, A. (2010). From “ivory tower traditionalists” to “entrepreneurial scientists”? Academic scientists in fuzzy university-industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709349963
  • Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy, 40(10), 1354–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.002
  • Lee, E., & Puranam, P. (2016). The implementation imperative: Why one should implement even imperfect strategies perfectly. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1529–1546. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2414
  • Mäkinen, E. I., & Esko, T. (2023). Nascent academic entrepreneurs and identity work at the boundaries of professional domains. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 24(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503211063896
  • Marks, S., & MacDermid, S. (1996). Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(2), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/353506
  • Meek, W., & Wood, M. (2016). Navigating a sea of change: Identity misalignment and adaptation in academic entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(5), 1093–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12163
  • Miller, K., Alexander, A., Cunningham, J. A., & Albats, E. (2018). Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Management, 77(1–3), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091710
  • Murnieks, C., Mosakowski, E., & Cardon, M. (2014). Pathways of passion: Identity centrality, passion, and behavior among entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 40(6), 583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311433855
  • Nabi, G., Holden, R., & Walmsley, A. (2010). From student to entrepreneur: Towards a model of graduate entrepreneurial career‐making. Journal of Education & Work, 23(5), 89–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2010.515968
  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, S., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD.
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  • O’Kane, C., Haar, J., & Zhang, J. A. (2022). Examining the micro‐level challenges experienced by publicly funded university principal investigators. R&D Management, 52(4), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12511
  • O’Kane, C., Mangematin, V., Zhang, J., & Cunningham, J. (2020). How university-based principal investigators shape a hybrid role identity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120179
  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610
  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., Mckelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  • Pilegaard, M., Moroz, P., & Neergaard, H. (2010). An auto-ethnographic perspective on academic entrepreneurship: Implications for research in the social sciences and humanities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.50304416
  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/259261
  • Price, C., & Whiteley, A. (2014). Corporate culture and employee identity: Co-option or commitment through contestation? Journal of Change Management, 14(2), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2014.896391
  • Radu-Lefebvre, M., Lefebvre, V., Crosina, E., & Hytti, U. (2021). Entrepreneurial identity: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(6), 1550–1590. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211013795
  • Ramsden, P. (1998). Managing the effective university. Higher Education Research & Development, 17(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436980170307
  • Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3
  • Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01
  • Sandström, C., Wennberg, K., Wallin, M., & Zherlygina, Y. (2016). Public policy for academic entrepreneurship initiatives: A review and critical discussion. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 1232–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9536-x
  • Schulte, P. (2004). The entrepreneurial university: A strategy for institutional development. Higher Education in Europe, 29(2), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772042000234811
  • Sellers, R., Rowley, S., Chavous, T., Shelton, N., & Smith, M. (1997). Multidimensional inventory of black identity: A preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.805
  • Settles, I. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487–500.
  • Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12116
  • Sieger, P., & Monsen, E. (2015). Founder, academic, or employee? A nuanced study of career choice intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12181
  • Stead, J. G., & Stead, E. (2000). Eco-enterprise strategy: Standing for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(4), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006188725928
  • Stets, J., & Burke, P. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870
  • Stryker, S., & Burke, P. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840
  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786972
  • Terämä, E., Smallman, M., Lock, S. J., Johnson, C., Austwick, M. Z., & Derrick, G. E. (2016). Beyond academia–interrogating research impact in the research excellence framework. Public Library of Science ONE, 11(12), e0168533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168533
  • Van Dijk, R., & Van Dick, R. (2009). Navigating organizational change: Change leaders, employee resistance and work-based identities. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010902879087
  • Wagenschwanz, A. M. (2021). The identity of entrepreneurs: Providing conceptual clarity and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12241
  • Wang, M., Cai, J., Soetanto, D., & Guo, Y. (2021). Why do academic scientists participate in academic entrepreneurship? An empirical investigation of department context and the antecedents of entrepreneurial behaviour. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(4), 1497–1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1844486
  • Wang, M., Soetanto, D., Cai, J., & Munir, H. (2021). Scientist or entrepreneur? Identity centrality, university entrepreneurial mission, and academic entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09845-6
  • Wells, L. (1978). Theories of deviance and the self-concept. Social Psychology, 41(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033556
  • West, G. P., III, & Gemmell, R. M. (2021). Learning behaviors across levels in new ventures and innovation outcomes. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(1), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12484
  • Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800902825835
  • Zhao, Z., Broström, A., & Cai, J. (2020). Promoting academic engagement: University context and individual characteristics. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 304–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9680-6
  • Zou, B., Guo, J., Guo, F., Shi, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Who am I? The influence of social identification on academic entrepreneurs’ role conflict. International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal, 15(2), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0492-1