Effects of Brucella ovis infection on semen characteristics of 16-month-old red deer stags

References

• Austin , JW , Hupp , EW and Murphree , RL . 1961 . Comparison of quality of bull semen collected in the artificial vagina and by electroejaculation . Journal of Dairy Science , 12 : 2292 – 2297 .
   Google Scholar
• Bailey , KM . 1986 . Studies on the vaccination of sheep against Brucella ovis infection. PhD thesis , PalmerstonNorth : Massey University .
   Google Scholar
• Bailey , KM . 1997 . Naturally acquired Brucella ovis infection in a deer . Surveillance , 24 ( 3 ) : 10 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Barth , AD and Oko , RJ . 1989 . Abnormal Morphology of Bovine Spermatozoa , Ames : Iowa State University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Beatson , NS , Campbell , AC , Judson , HG and Wilson , PR . 2000 . Recommendations for improving performance in deer production systems 1: Improving pregnancy rate and achieving early conception date in breeding hinds . Proceedings of a Deer Course for Veterinarians, No. 17, Deer Branch of the New Zealand Veterinary Association , : 9 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Blom , E . 1983 . Pathological conditions in the genital organs and in the semen as ground for rejection of breeding bulls for import or export to and from Denmark, 1958-1982 . Nordisk Veterinaer Medicin , 35 : 105 – 130 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buddle , MB and Boyes , BW . 1953 . A Brucella mutant causing genital disease of sheep in New Zealand . Australian Veterinary Journal , 29 : 145 – 153 .
   Google Scholar
• Cameron , RDA , Carles , AB and Lauerman , LH . 1971 . The incidence of Brucella ovis in some Kenya flocks and its relationship to clinical lesions and semen quality . Veterinary Record , 89 : 552 – 57 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cameron , RDA and Lauerman , LH . 1976 . Characteristics of semen changes during Brucella ovis infection in rams . Veterinary Record , 99 : 231 – 233 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh , JC , Barth , AD , Cates , WF and Glover , GJ . 1985 . “ Electro-ejaculation and semen evaluation of Wapiti ” . In Biology of Deer Production. Bulletin 22 , 197 – 203 . Wellington : The Royal Society of New Zealand .
   Google Scholar
• Hunter , JW . 1997 . Current reproduction technology as applied to the New Zealand deer industry . Proceedings of a Deer Course for Veterinarians, No. 14, Deer Branch of the New Zealand Veterinary Association , : 179 – 197 .
   Google Scholar
• Jebson , JL , Hartley , WJ and McFarlane , D . 1954 . The artificial infection of sheep with a brucella-like organism; Part II: The artificial infection of rams . New Zealand Veterinary Journal , 2 : 85 – 89 .
   Google Scholar
• Kott , RW , Halver , GC , Firehammer , B and Thomas , VM . 1988 . Relationships between Brucella ovis semen culture and various semen and serology parameters . Theriogenology , 29 : 961 – 970 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln , GA and Guinness , FE . 1973 . The sexual significance of the rut in red deer . Journal of Reproduction and Fertility , 19 : 475 – 489 .
   Google Scholar
• Mattner , PE and Voglmayr , PE . 1962 . A comparison of ram semen collected by the artificial vagina and by electro-ejaculation . Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry , 2 : 78 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• McGowan , B and Devine , DR . 1960 . Epididymitis of rams. The effect of the naturally occurring disease upon fertility . Cornell Veterinarian , 50 : 102 – 105 .
   Google Scholar
• Ridler , AL , West , DM , Stafford , KJ , Wilson , PR and Fenwick , SG . 2000 . Transmission of Brucella ovis from rams to red deer stags . New Zealand Veterinary Journal , 48 : 57 – 59 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott , L . 1999 . Brucella ovis: recent developments and control options . Proceedings of aDeer Course forVeterinarians, No. 16, Deer Branch of the New Zealand Veterinary Association , : 117 – 121 .
   Google Scholar
• West , DM , Stafford , KJ , Sargison , ND , Fenwick , SG and Reichel , MP . 1999 . Attempted transmission of Brucella ovis between stags and from stags to rams . Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production , 59 : 134 – 136 .
   Google Scholar