784
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scientific Articles

Applying animal-based welfare assessments on New Zealand dairy farms: feasibility and a comparison with United Kingdom data

&
Pages 212-217 | Received 06 May 2015, Accepted 24 Jan 2016, Published online: 03 Mar 2016

References

  • Andreasen SN, Sandøe P, Forkman B. Can animal-based welfare assessment be simplified? A comparison of the welfare quality protocol for dairy cattle and the simpler and less time-consuming protocol developed by the Danish Cattle Federation. Animal Welfare 23, 81–94, 2014 doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.1.081
  • *Anonymous Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for cattle. http://www.welfarequalitynetwork.net/downloadattachment/45627/21650/Cattle%20Protocol%20without%20Veal%20Calves.pdf (accessed 24th April 2015). Welfare Quality Network, Uppsala, Sweden, 2009
  • *Anonymous Dairying today. http://www.dcanz.com/about-nz-dairy-industry/dairying-today (accessed 01 July 2015). Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand, Wellington, NZ, 2015
  • Brownlie TS, Morton JM, Heuer C, McDougall S. A randomised controlled study to assess the effects of an extension programme on the 6 week in-calf rate of seasonal calving, pasture-based dairy herds in New Zealand. The Veterinary Journal 203, 169–76, 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.11.014
  • Burow E, Rousing T, Thomsen PT, Otten ND, Sorensen JT. Effect of grazing on the cow welfare of dairy herds evaluated by a multidimensional welfare index. Animal 7, 834–42, 2013 doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002297
  • Chaplin SJ, Ternent HE, Offer JE, Logue DN, Knight CH. A comparison of hoof lesions and behaviour in pregnant and early lactation heifers at housing. The Veterinary Journal 159, 147–53, 2000 doi: 10.1053/tvjl.1999.0404
  • Coignard M, Guatteo R, Veissier I, Lehébel A, Hoogveld C, Mounier L, Bareille N. Does milk yield reflect the level of welfare in dairy herds? The Veterinary Journal 199, 184–7, 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.011
  • de Vries M, Bokkers EAM, van Schaik G, Botreau R, Engel B, Dijkstra T, de Boer IJM. Evaluating results of the welfare quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classification of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 6264–73, 2013
  • Endres MI, Lobeck-Luchterhand KM, Espejo LA, Tucker CB. Evaluation of the sample needed to accurately estimate outcome-based measurements of dairy welfare on farm. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 3523–30, 2014 doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7464
  • Fabian J, Laven RA, Whay HR. The prevalence of lameness on New Zealand dairy farms: a comparison of farmer estimates and locomotion scoring. The Veterinary Journal 201, 31–8, 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.011
  • Getter KL, Behe BK, Conner DS, Howard PH. Pasture-raised milk: the market for a differentiated product. Journal of Food Products Marketing 20, 146–61, 2014 doi: 10.1080/10454446.2012.726949
  • Green LE, Huxley JN, Banks C, Green MJ. Temporal associations between low body condition, lameness and milk yield in a UK dairy herd. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 113, 63–71, 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.10.009
  • Heath C, Lin Y, Mullan S, Browne WJ, Main D. Implementing welfare quality in UK assurance schemes: Evaluating the challenges. Animal Welfare 23, 95–107, 2014 doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.1.095
  • Hernandez-Mendo O, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Veira DM, Weary DM. Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1209–14, 2007 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71608-9
  • Kirchner MK, Schulze Westerath H, Knierim U, Tessitore E, Cozzi G, Winckler C. On-farm animal welfare assessment in beef bulls: consistency over time of single measures and aggregated Welfare Quality® scores. Animal 8, 461–9, 2014 doi: 10.1017/S1751731113002267
  • Krohn CC, Munksgaard L. Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments II. Lying and lying-down behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37, 1–16, 1993 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90066-X
  • *Laven RA, Vink D, Chesterton RN. Digital dermatitis in New Zealand: Development of a control and management strategy. Proceedings of the 28th World Buiatric Congress. P 56, 2014
  • Logue DN, Mayne CS. Welfare-positive management and nutrition for the dairy herd: a European perspective. The Veterinary Journal 199, 31–8, 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.027
  • Macdonald KA, Verkerk GA, Thorrold BS, Pryce JE, Penno JW, McNaughton LR, Burton LJ, Lancaster JAS, Williamson JH, Holmes CW. A comparison of three strains of Holstein-Friesian grazed on pasture and managed under different feed allowances. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1693–707, 2008 doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0441
  • Main DCJ, Whay HR, Leeb C, Webster AJF. Formal animal-based welfare assessment in UK certification schemes. Animal Welfare 16, 233–6, 2007
  • Main DCJ, Barker ZE, Leach KA, Bell NJ, Whay HR, Browne WJ. Sampling strategies for monitoring lameness in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1970–8, 2010 doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2500
  • Main DCJ, Rogerson I, Crawley MC, Avizenius J, Fraser A, Mullan S. Welfare outcomes assessment in dairy farm assurance schemes. Cattle Practice 20, 142–8, 2012
  • Maxwell O, Miguel-Pacheco G, Newsome R, Randall L, Remnant J, Thomas H, Huxley J. Lameness in cattle 1. Recent research to inform clinical practice. In Practice 37, 127–38, 2015 doi: 10.1136/inp.h897
  • McDougall S, Heuer C, Morton J, Brownlie T. Use of herd management programmes to improve the reproductive performance of dairy cattle. Animal 8(Supplement 1), 199–210, 2014 doi: 10.1017/S1751731114000457
  • Moses LE. A two-sample test. Psychometrika 17, 239–47, 1952
  • Nuss K, Weidmann E. Hock lesions in dairy cows - an overview. Tierarztliche Praxis Ausgabe G: Grosstiere - Nutztiere 41, 234–44, 2013
  • Roche JR, Dillon PG, Stockdale CR, Baumgard LH, VanBaale MJ. Relationships among international body condition scoring systems. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 3076–79, 2004 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73441-4
  • Sahu SK, Cockrem JF, Parkinson TJ, Laven RA. The effects of exclusion of progesterone or Day 0 GnRH from a GnRH, prostaglandin, GnRH + progesterone program on synchronization of ovulation in pasture-based dairy heifers. Theriogenology 82, 643–51, 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.06.004
  • *Stafford KJ. Welfare of dairy cattle. In: Animal Welfare in New Zealand. Pp 35–56. New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Cambridge, NZ, 2013
  • Ventura BA, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Animal welfare concerns and values of stakeholders within the dairy industry. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28, 109–26, 2014 doi: 10.1007/s10806-014-9523-x
  • *Verkerk GA, Hemsworth PH. Managing cow welfare in large dairy herds. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium, pp 436–43, 2010
  • Webster AJF. The virtuous bicycle: A delivery vehicle for improved farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare 18, 141–7, 2009
  • Webster JR, Schütz KE, Sutherland MA, Stewart M, Mellor DJ. Different animal welfare orientations towards some key research areas of current relevance to pastoral dairy farming in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 63, 31–6, 2015 doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.958117
  • Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, Webster AJF. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Veterinary Record 153, 197–202, 2003a doi: 10.1136/vr.153.7.197
  • Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, Webster AJF. Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: consensus of expert opinion. Animal Welfare 12, 205–17, 2003b
  • Windschnurer I, Schmied C, Boivin X, Waiblinger S. Reliability and inter-test relationship of tests for on-farm assessment of dairy cows’ relationship to humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114, 37–53, 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.017
  • Zaffino Heyerhoff JC, LeBlanc SJ, DeVries TJ, Nash CGR, Gibbons J, Orsel K, Barkema HW, Solano L, Rushen J, de Passillé AM, et al. Prevalence of and factors associated with hock, knee, and neck injuries on dairy cows in freestall housing in Canada. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 173–84, 2014 doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6367

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.