127
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE

The effect of pearl spacing on single-cycle load-to-failure and cyclic loading parameters of 2.0 mm pearl locking plates

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 337-342 | Received 06 Feb 2021, Accepted 01 Jun 2021, Published online: 05 Jul 2021

References

  • *Anonymous. Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Bone Plates, ASTM Designation F382-14. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016
  • Benjamini Y, Krieger AM, Yekutieli D. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 93, 491–507, 2006
  • Blake CA, Boudrieau RJ, Torrance BS, Tacvorian EK, Cabassu JB, Gaudette GR, Kowaleski MP. Single cycle to failure in bending of three standard and five locking plates and plate constructs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 24, 408–17, 2011
  • Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 48, 915–8, 1987
  • Cabassu JB, Kowaleski MP, Shorinko JK, Blake CA, Gaudette GR, Boudrieau RJ. Single cycle to failure in torsion of three standard and five locking plate constructs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 24, 418–25, 2011
  • Chan CB, Spierenburg M, Ihle SL, Tudor-Locke C. Use of pedometers to measure physical activity in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226, 2010–5, 2005
  • DeTora M, Kraus K. Mechanical testing of 3.5 mm locking and non-locking bone plates. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 21, 318–22, 2008
  • Garofolo S, Pozzi A. Effect of plating technique on periosteal vasculature of the radius in dogs: a cadaveric study. Veterinary Surgery 42, 255–261, 2013
  • Haidukewych GJ. Innovations in locking plate technology. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 12, 205–212, 2004
  • Helfet DL, Haas NP, Schatzker J, Matter P, Moser R, Hanson B. AO philosophy and principles of fracture management-its evolution and evaluation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 85, 1156–60, 2003
  • Hudson CC, Pozzi A, Lewis DD. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: applications and techniques in dogs and cats. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 22, 175–82, 2009.
  • *Kraus KH, Ness MG. Orthomed Standard Operating Procedures for SOP Fixation of Fractures. Orthomed UK Ltd, Huddersfield, UK, 2007
  • Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Strauss E, Egol KA. The evolution of locked plates. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 88(Suppl 4), 189–200, 2006
  • Malenfant RC, Sod GA. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model. Veterinary Surgery 43, 465–70, 2014
  • Miclau T, Martin RE. The evolution of modern plate osteosynthesis. Injury 28(Suppl 1), A3–6, 1997
  • Ness MG. The effect of bending and twisting on the stiffness and strength of the 3.5 SOP implant. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 22, 132–6, 2009
  • *Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. Fractures: classification, diagnosis, and treatment. In: Brinker, Piermattei and Flo's Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. Fourth Edition. Pp 25–159. Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2006
  • Rutherford S, Ness MG. Effect of contouring on bending structural stiffness and bending strength of the 3.5 titanium SOP implant. Veterinary Surgery 41, 983–7, 2012.
  • Stoffel K, Klaue K, Perren SM. Functional load of plates in fracture fixation in vivo and its correlate in bone healing. Injury 31 Suppl 2, S–B37–50, 2000
  • Tan SLE, Balogh ZJ. Indications and limitations of locked plating. Injury 40, 683–91, 2009.
  • Tremolada G, Taggart R, Lewis DD, Palmer RH, Lambrechts NE. An assessment of mechanical properties and screw push-out for two 3.5mm pearl-type locking plate systems. American Journal of Veterinary Research 80, 533–8, 2019
  • Walter RM, Carrier DR. Ground forces applied by galloping dogs. Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 208–16, 2007
  • * Non-peer-reviewed

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.