Religious agency, identity, and communication: reflections on history and theory of religion

References

• Appadurai, Arjun. 2000. “Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination.” Public Culture 12 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1215/08992363-12-1-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret S. 1996. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Orig. 1988 ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, Richard D., Kay Deaux, and Tracy McLaughlin-Volpe. 2004. “An Organizing Framework for Collective Identity: Articulation and Significance of Multidimensionality.” Psychological Bulletin 130 (1): 80–114. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. 1980. How to do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. 2nd ed., repr. with corr. and new index. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, Mary. 1991. “Writing and Religion: Ancient Literacy and the Function of the Written Word in Roman Religion.” In Literacy in the Roman world, edited by Ann Arbor, Mi.: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Belayche, Nicole, Veit Rosenberger, Jörg Rüpke, Andreas Bendlin, and Annie Vigourt. 2005. “Divination Romaine.” ThesCRA 3: 79–104.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, Robert N. 2011. Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, Robert N., and Hans Joas, eds. 2012. The Axial Age and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor books ed. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Bietti Sestieri, Anna Maria. 2005. “A Reconstruction of Historical Powers in Bronze and Early Ice Age Italy Based on Recent Archeological Research.” In Papers in Italian Archaeology VI : Communities and Settlements from the Neolithic to the Early Medieval Period; Proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology Held at the University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, the Netherlands, April 15–17, 2003 Vol. 1, edited by Attema, Peter & al., et, 9–24. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Bowersock, G. W. 2013. “A Different Turning Point for Mankind?” New York Review of Books 60, 9 May: 56–58.
   Google Scholar
• Bowes, Kimberly Diane. 2008. Private Worship, Public Values, and Religious Change in Late Antiquity. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, Pascal. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brashears, Matthew E. 2010. “Anomia and the Sacred Canopy: Testing a Network Theory.” Social Networks 32: 187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brelich, Angelo. 1969. Paides e parthenoi 1. Roma: Ateneo.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer, Jan N. 1994. Greek Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Peter. 2012. Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 AD. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkert, Walter. 1995. “Greek Poleis and Civic Cults: Some Further Thoughts.” In Studies in the Ancient Greek Polis, edited by Mogens Herman Hansen and Kurt Raaflaub, 201–210. Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, James E. 2004. “A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity.” Self and Identity 3 (3): 239–262. doi:10.1080/13576500444000047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Colin. 2009. “Distinguishing the Power of Agency from Agentic Power: A Note on Weber and the ‘Black Box’ of Personal Agency.” Sociological Theory 27 (4): 407–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancik, Hubert. 1973. “Römischer Religionsunterricht in apostolischer Zeit: Ein pastoralgeschichtlicher Versuch zu Statius, Silve V 3,176–184.” Wort Gottes in der Zeit: Festschrift für K.H. Schelkle, edited by Hermann Feld and Josef Nolte, 181–197. Düsseldorf: Patmos.
   Google Scholar
• Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Certeau, Michel de. 1987. La faiblesse de croire. Texte établi et présenté par Luce Giard ed. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Certeau, Michel de. 2007. Arts de Faire. Nouvelle ed. par Luce Giard ed. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, Daniel. 2011. A Dictionary of Media and Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheong, Pauline Hope. 2011. “Religious Leaders, Mediated Authority, and Social Change.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 39 (4): 452–454. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2011.577085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, Pauline Hope, Shirlena Huang, and Jessie P. H. Poon. 2011. “Religious Communication and Epistemic Authority of Leaders in Wired Faith Organizations.” Journal of Communication 61 (5): 938–958. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01579.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, François. 2008. “Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency.” Sociological Theory 26 (1): 51–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbelaere, Karel. 2011. “The Contextualization of Definitions of Religion.” Revue Internationale de Sociologie 21/1: 191–204.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbelaere, Karel, and Jan Lauwers. 1973. “Definition of Religion: A Sociological Critique.” Social Compass 20: 535–551. doi: 10.1177/003776867302000403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dommelen, Peter, Fokke Gerritsen, and Bernard Knapp. 2005. “Common Places: Archaeologies of Community and Landscape.” In Papers in Italian archaeology 6: Communities and settlements from the Neolithic to the early Medieval period; proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology held at the University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, the Netherlands, April 15–17, 2003 Vol. 1, edited by Peter Alle Jelle Attema, 55–63. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Émile. 1947. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life: A Study in Religious Sociology. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eidinow, Esther. 2011. “Networks and Narratives: A Model for Ancient Greek Religion.” Kernos 24: 9–38. doi: 10.4000/kernos.1925
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, Samuel N. 1979. Tradition, Wandel und Modernität Übers. von Suzanne Heintz. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. N., ed. 1986. The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. Albany: State University Press of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., ed. 1987. Kulturen der Achsenzeit: Ihre Ursprünge und ihre Vielfalt. Teil 1: Griechenland, Israel, Mesopotamien. Teil 2: Spätantike, Indien, China, Islam. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, Naomi, Russell Spears, and Bertjan Doosje, eds. 1999. Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1998. “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. doi: 10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Steven. 2011. “‘Religion,’ ‘The Secular’ and the Critical Study of Religion.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 40 (4): 419–442. doi: 10.1177/0008429811420406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2010. “Ten Implications of Semantic Holism for Theories of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 22 (4): 283–292. doi: 10.1163/157006810X531067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2013. “‘God(s)’ as a Comparative Category.” Dîn 1: 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Gary Alan. 2010. “The Sociology of the Local: Action and its Publics.” Sociological Theory 28 (4): 355–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, Timothy. 1997. “A Critique of “Religion” as a Cross-Cultural Category1.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 9 (2): 91–110. doi:10.1163/157006897X00070
   Google Scholar
• Fögen, Marie-Theres. 1993. Die Enteignung der Wahrsager: Studien zum kaiserlichen Wissensmonopol in der Spätantike. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Stephan. 2001. “Beyond Agency.” Scoiological Theory 19 (1): 24–40. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Martin. 2015. “Processes of Religious Individualization: Stocktaking and Issues for the Future.” Religion doi:10.1080/0048721X.2015.1024035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füssel, Marian. 2006. “Die Kunst der Schwachen: Zum Begriff der ‘Aneignung’ in der Geschichtswissenschaft.” Sozial.Geschichte 21 (3): 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Eugene, Chad M. Bauman, and Davina C. Lopez. 2009. “Fuzzy But Not Warm: On the (Continuing) Descriptive and Analytical Inutility of ‘Spirituality’.” Religion & Education 36 (2): 141–149. doi: 10.1080/15507394.2009.10012450
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, Will M., Aiyana K. Willard, Ara Norenzayan, and Joseph Henrich. 2011. “The Cultural Transmission of Faith: Why Innate Intuitions are Necessary, But Insufficient, to Explain Religious Belief.” Religion 41: 389–410. doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.604510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Christopher. 2008. “The Self and Hellenstic-Roman Philosophical Therapy.” In Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit: Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond, edited by Alexander Arweiler and Melanie Möller, 359–380. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Christopher. 2009. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giri, Vijai N. 2006. “Culture and Communication Style.” Review of Communication 6 (1): 124–130. doi: 10.1080/15358590600763391
   Google Scholar
• Gladigow, Burkhard. 1995. “Struktur der Öffentlichkeit und Bekenntnis in polytheistischen Religionen.” In Secrecy and Concealment: Studies in the History of Mediterranean and Near Eastern Religions, edited by Hans G. Kippenberg and Guy G. Stroumsa, 17–35. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Richard. 2008. “Superstitio, Superstition and Religious Repression in the Late Roman Republic and Principate (100 BCE-300 CE).” In The Religion of Fools? Superstition Past and Present, edited by S. A. Smith and Alan Knight, 72–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Richard. 2013. “The Religious Anthropology of Late-Antique ‘High’ Magical Practice.” In The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean, edited by Jörg Rüpke, 163–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, Hanno. 1999. “Shifting Paradigms: Decentering the Discourse of Mass Communication Research.” Mass Communication and Society 2 (3): 175–183. doi: 10.1080/15205436.1999.9677871
   Google Scholar
• Hitlin, Steven, and Glen H. Elder. 2007. “Time, Self, and the Curiously Abstract Concept of Agency.” Sociological Theory 25 (2): 170–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isomae, Jun'ichi. 2002. “The Discursive Position of Religious Studies in Japan: Masaharu Anesaki and the Origins of Religious Studies.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14 (1): 21–46. doi: 10.1163/157006802760198758
   Google Scholar
• Ivakhiv, Adrian. 2006. “Toward a Geography of “Religion”: Mapping the Distribution of an Unstable Signifier.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (1): 169–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers, Karl. 1949. Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte. München: Piper.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, Hans. 1996. Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, Hans. 2012. “Gefährliche Prozessbegriffe: Eine Warnung vor der Rede von Differenzierung, Rationalisierung und Modernisierung.” In Umstrittene Säkularisierung: Soziologische und historische Analysen zur Differenzierung von Religion und Politik, edited by Karl Gabriel, Christel Gärtner, and Detlef Pollack, 603–622. Berlin: Berlin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, Hans, and Jörg Rüpke, eds. 2013. Bericht über die erste Förderperiode der Kolleg-Forschergruppe “Religiöse Individualisierung in historischer Perspektive” (2008–2012). Erfurt: Max Weber Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Christopher P. 2012. “Joys and Sorrows of Multiple Citizenship: The Case of Dio Chrysostom.” In Patrie d'Origine et Patries electives: Les Citoyennetés multiples dans le monde grec d’époque romaine, edited by Anna Heller and Anne-Valérie Pont, 213–219. Pessac: Ausonius.
   Google Scholar
• Krech, Volkhard. 2000. “From Historicism to Functionalism: The Rise of Scientific Approaches to Religions Around 1900 and Their Socio-Cultural Context.” Numen 47: 244–265. doi: 10.1163/156852700511540
   Google Scholar
• Latte, Kurt. 1968. “Promanteia.” In Kleine Schriften: zu Religion, Recht, Literatur und Sprache der Griechen und Römer, edited by Kurt Latte, 193–195. München: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, E. Thomas. 1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Wei-Cheng. 2011. “Sign.” Material Religion: The Journal of Objects, Art and Belief 7: 100–106. doi: 10.2752/175183411X12968355482213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövheim, Mia. 2011. “Mediatisation of Religion: A Critical Appraisal.” An Interdisciplinary Journal 12 (2): 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Luckmann, Thomas. 1991. Die unsichtbare Religion Mit einem Vorwort von Hubert Knoblauch. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Luther H., and Donald Wiebe. 2012. “Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80 (3): 587–597. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfs030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuzawa, Tomoko. 2000. “The Production of ‘Religion’ and the Task of the Scholar: Russell McCutcheon Among the Smiths.” Culture and Religion 1 (1): 123–130. doi: 10.1080/01438300008567146
   Google Scholar
• Masuzawa, Tomoko. 2005. The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, Robert N., ed. 1998. Comparing the Cognitive Foundations of Religion and Science. Atlanta, Georgia: Department of Psychology Emory University.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, Robert N., ed. 2002. Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, Robert N., ed. 2012. Why Religion is Natural and Science is not. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, Russell T. 1997. Manufacturing religion: the discourse on sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, Meredith. 2008. Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, George H[erbert]. 1934. Mind, Self & Society. Chicago, Ill: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, George Herbert, David L. Miller, and George H. Mead. 1982. The Individual and the Social Self: Unpublished Work of George Herbert Mead. Chicago [u.a.]: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, David. 2011. “Mediation or Mediatisation: The History of Media in the Study of Religion.” An Interdisciplinary Journal 12/2: 137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Mörth, Ingo. 1993. “Kommunikation.” In Handwörterbuch religionswissenschaftlicher Grundbegriffe, edited by Hubert Cancik, Gladigow Burkhard and Karl-Heinz Kohl, 392–414. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, T. 2003. “Elements of a Semiotic Theory of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 15 (1): 48–67. doi: 10.1163/15700680360549411
   Google Scholar
• Noland, C. 2009. Agency and Embodiment: Performing Gesture/producing Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nongbri, Brent. 2013. Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onorato, Rina S., and John C. Turner. 2004. “Fluidity in the Self-concept: The Shift from Personal to Social Identity.” European Journal of Social Psychology 34: 257–278. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsi, Robert. 2008. “The ‘So-Called History’ of the Study of Religion.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 20: 134–138. doi: 10.1163/157006808X283552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, Bernd-Christian. 2011. Magie: Rezeptions- und diskursgeschichtliche Analysen von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, Bernd-Christian, and Michael Stausberg. 2013. Defining Magic: A Reader. Sheffield [u.a.]: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, Enzo. 2009. “Religion as Communication.” Revue Internationale de Sociologie 21 (1): 205–229.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Ingwer. 1990. Rituelle Kommunikation: Sprachliche Verfahren zur Konstitution ritueller Bedeutung und zur Organisation des Rituals. Tübingen: Narr.
   Google Scholar
• de Polignac, Francois. 2009. “Sanctuaries and Festivals.” In A Companion to Archaic Greece, edited by K. A. Raaflaub and H. v. Wees, 427–443. Malden, MA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Punyanunt-Carter, Narissra M., Jason S. Wrench, Michael W. Corrigan, and James C. McCroskey. 2008a. “An Examination of Reliability and Validity of the Religious Communication Apprehension Scale.” Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 37 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1080/17475750802077339
   Google Scholar
• Punyanunt-Carter, Narissra M., Jason S. Wrench, Michael W. Corrigan, and James C. McCroskey. 2008b. “An Examination of Reliability and Validity of the Religious Communication Apprehension Scale.” Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 37 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1080/17475750802077339
   Google Scholar
• Pye, Michael. 2003. “Modern Japan and the Science of Religions.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 15: 1–27. doi: 10.1163/15700680360549394
   Google Scholar
• Rathje, Annette. 2005. “Reconstracting the Orientralizing and Archaic Periods.” In Papers in Italian archaeology 6: Communities and settlements from the Neolithic to the early Medieval period; proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology held at the University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, the Netherlands, April 15–17, 2003 Vol. 1, edited by Attema, Peter & al., et., 25–31. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Rebillard, Éric. 2012. Christians and Their Many Identities in Late Antiquity, North Africa, 200–450 CE. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Rossenberg, Erik. 2005. “Between Households and Communities: Layers of Social Life in the Later Bronze Age and Early Iron Age of Central Italy.” In Papers in Italian Archaeology VI: Communities and Settlements from the Neolithic to the Early Medieval Period. Proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology held at the University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, The Netherlands, April 15–17, 2003, edited by Peter Attema, A. Nijboer and A. Zifferero, 84–91. Oxford: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 1995. Kalender und Öffentlichkeit: Die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation von Zeit in Rom. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2001. “Antike Religion als Kommunikation.” In Gebet und Fluch, Zeichen und Traum: Aspekte religiöser Kommunikation in der Antike, edited by Kai Brodersen, 13–30. Münster: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2010. “Hellenistic and Roman Empires and Euro-Mediterranean Religion.” Journal of Religion in Europe 3: 197–214. doi: 10.1163/187489210X501509
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2011a. Aberglauben oder Individualität? Religiöse Abweichung im römischen Reich. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2011b. “Reichsreligion? Überlegungen zur Religionsgeschichte des antiken Mittelmeerraums in römischer Zeit.” Historische Zeitschrift 292: 297–322. doi: 10.1524/hzhz.2011.0012
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2011c. The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine: Time, History and the Fasti. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2012a. “Lived Ancient Religion: Questioning ‘Cults’ and ‘Polis Religion’.” Mythos ns 5 (2011): 191–204.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2012b. “Public and Publicity: Long-term Changes in Religious Festivals during the Roman Republic.” In Festivals in the Ancient World, edited by Johan Rasmus Brandt and Jon Wikene Iddeng, 305–322. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2012c. Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual change. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2012d. “Religiöse Individualität in der Antike.” In Der ganze Mensch: Zur Anthropologie der Antike und ihrer europäischen Nachgeschichte, edited by Bernd Janowski, 199–219. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2012e. “Sakralisierung von Zeit in Rom und Italien: Produktionsstrategien und Aneignungen von Heiligkeit.” In Heilige, Heiliges und Heiligkeit in spätantiken Religionskulturen, edited by Peter Gemeinhardt and Katharina Heyden, 231–247. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2013a. “Heiliger und öffentlicher Raum: Römische Perspektiven auf private Religion.” In Salutationes – Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte und ihrer Diskussion: Festschrift für Peter Herz zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Babett Edelmann-Singer & Heinrich Konen, 159–168. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg, ed. 2013b. The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2013c. “Introduction: Individualisation and Individuation as Concepts for Historical Research.” In The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean, edited by Jörg Rüpke, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2013d. “Was ist ein Heiligtum? Pluralität als Gegenstand der Religionswissenschaft.” In Alternative Voices: A Plurality Approach for Religious Studies. Essays in Honor of Ulrich Berner, edited by Afe Adogame, Magnus Echtler, and Oliver Freiberger, 211–225. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Rüpke, Jörg. 2014. Religion: Antiquity and its Legacy. London/New York: Tauris/Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saler, Benson. 1999. “Biology and Religion: On Establishing a Problematic1.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 11 (4): 386–394. doi: 10.1163/157006899X00104
   Google Scholar
• Santangelo, Federico. 2013. Divination, Prediction and the End of the Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2003. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction, 3rd ed. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schilbrack, Kevin. 2010. “Religions: Are There Any?” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78 (4): 1112–1138. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lfq086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Robert A. 2006. “All Generalizations Are Bad: Postmodernism on Theories.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74 (1): 157–171. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lfj026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Robert A. 1999. “Weber and Geertz on the Meaning of Religion.” Religion 29 (1): 61–71. doi: 10.1006/reli.1998.0178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setaioli, Aldo. 2013. “Cicero and Seneca on the Fate of the Soul: Private Feelings and Philosophical Doctrines.” In The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean, edited by Jörg Rüpke, 455–488. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Brent D. 2011. Sacred Violence: African Christians and Sectarian Hatred in the Age of Augustine, 1. publ. ed. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, Daniel. 2011. “The Moodines of Action.” Sociological Theory 29 (3): 199–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, David B. 2011. “Contexts, Agency, and Social Change in Ancient Greece.” In State Formation in Italy and Greece – Questioning the Neoevolutionist Paradigm, edited by N. Terrenato and D. C. Haggis, 135–161. Oxford Oakville: Oxbow Books, S.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Jonathan Z. 1990. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago: UP.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1987. “Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4): 697–710. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00055345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stausberg, Michael. 2009. “There is Life in the Old Dog Yet: An Introduction to Contemporary Theories of Religion.” In Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion, edited by Michael Stausberg, 1–21. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stausberg, Michael. 2010a. “Distinctions, Differentiations, Ontology, and Non-humans in Theories of Religion.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 22: 354–374. doi: 10.1163/157006810X531139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stausberg, Michael. 2010b. “Prospects in Theories of Religion.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 22: 223–238. doi: 10.1163/157006810X531021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stausberg, Michael. 2014. “Bellah's Religion in Human Evolution: A Postreview.” Numen 61 (2–3): 281–299. doi: 10.1163/15685276-12341320
   Google Scholar
• Stroumsa, Guy G. 2012. “Robert Bellah on the origins of religion: A Critical Review.” Revue de l'histoire des religions 229: 467–477. doi: 10.4000/rhr.7976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuckrad, Kocku von. 2014. The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800–2000. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sweek, Joel. 2002. “Biology of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14 (2): 196–218. doi: 10.1163/15700680260191761
   Google Scholar
• Taira, Teemu. 2013. “Making Space for Discursive Study in Religious Studies.” Religion 43 (1): 26–45. doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2013.742744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, Henri. 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour.” Social Science Information 13 (2): 65–93. doi: 10.1177/053901847401300204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taves, Ann. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taves, Ann. 2010. “Experience as Site of Contested Meaning and Value: The Attributional Dog and its Special Tail.” Religion 40 (4): 317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.religion.2010.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taves, Ann. 2011. “2010 Presidential Address: ‘Religion’ in the Humanities and the Humanities in the University.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 79 (2): 287–314. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lfr004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 1985. Human Agency and Language. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Carol S. 2009. “The Mediterranean World in the Early Iron Age.” In A Companion to Archaic Greece, edited by Kurt A. Raaflaub and Hans van Wees, 22–40. Malden, MA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tseung-Wong, Caroline Ng, and Maykel Verkuyten. 2012. “Religious and National Group Identification in Adolescence: A Study Among Three Religious Groups in Mauritius.” International Journal of Psychology 48 (5): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, John C. 1975. “Social Comparison and Social Identity: Some Prospects for Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 5 (1): 5–34. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420050102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrell, Hartmann, Volkhard Krech, and Hubert Knoblauch, eds. 1998a. Religion als Kommunikation. Würzburg: Ergon.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell, Hartmann, Volkhard Krech, and Hubert Knoblauch, eds. 1998b. “Religiöse Kommunikation: Einleitende Bemerkungen zu einem religionssoziologischen Forschungsprogramm.” In Religionals Kommunikation, edited by Hartmann Tyrell, 7–29. Würzburg: Ergon.
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez, Manuel A. 2008. “Studying Religion in Motion: A Networks Approach.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 20: 151–184. doi: 10.1163/157006808X283570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, Maykel. 2007. “Religious Group Identification and Inter-Religious Relations: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 10 (3): 341–357. doi: 10.1177/1368430207078695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, Maykel, and Borja Martinovic. 2012. “Social Identity Complexity and Immigrants’ Attitude Toward the Host Nation: The Intersection of Ethnic and Religious Group Identification.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38: 1165–1177. doi: 10.1177/0146167212446164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Yong. 2008. “Agency: The Internal Split of Structure.” Sociological Forum 23 (3): 481–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00087.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, Harvey, and Robert N. McCauley, eds. 2005. Mind and Religion: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Relevance Theory.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 249–287.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, Björn. 2000. “Modernity: One, None, or Many? European Origins and Modernity as a Global Condition.” Daedalus 129/1: 31–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, Björn. 2001. “Social Theory and Global History: The Three Cultural Crystallizations.” Thesis Eleven 65: 27–50. doi: 10.1177/0725513601065000003
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, Björn. 2004. “Cultural Crystallizations and World History: The Age od Ecumenical Renaissances.” In Eurasian Transformations, Tenth to Thirteenth Centuries: Crystallization, Divergences, Renaissances, edited by Johann P. Arnason and Björn Wittrock, 41–73. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, Greg. 2012. “Reading and Religion in Rome.” In Reflections on Religious Individuality: Greco-Roman and Judaeo-Christian Texts and Practices, edited by Jörg Rüpke and Wolfgang Spickermann, 193–208. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar