Translation and religion: crafting regimes of identity

References

• Asad, Talal. 1986. “The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology.” Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography 1: 141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan. 1980. Translation Studies. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan, and Harish Trivedi. 1999. Post-colonial Translation: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, Esther., Marianne Keppens, and Hegde Rajaram. 2010. Rethinking Religion in India: The Colonial Construction of Hinduism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Martha. 2006. An Anthology of Chinese Discourse on Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S. K. 2005. A History of Indian Literature. 500–1399: From the Courtly to the Popular. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Dejonge, Michael, and Christiane Tietz, eds. 2015. Translating Religion: What Is Lost and Gained? Routledge Studies in Religion. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• De Roover, Jakob. 2015. Europe, India and the Limits of Secularism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuisson, Daniel. 2003. The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge and Ideology. Translated by William Sayers. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Sautoy, Marcus. 2010. “Mathematical Identity.” In Identity, edited by Giselle Walker, and E. S. Leedham-Green. The Darwin College Lectures, 88–109. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, Philip. 1983. “Identifying Identity: A Semantic History.” The Journal of American History 69 (4): 910–931. doi: 10.2307/1901196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herling, Bradley L. 2006. The German Gītā: Hermeneutics and Discipline in the German Reception of Indian Thought, 1778–1831. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, Theo. 1999. Translation in Systems: Descriptive and Systemic Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, Theo. 2007. The Conference of the Tongues. Manchester: St. Jerome Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, Eva. 2005. “Translation in China-An Analytical Sturvey, First Century B.C.E. to Early Twentieth Century.” In Asian Translation Traditions, edited by Eva Hung and Judy Wakabayashi, 67–108. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, Hephzibah. 2011. Religious Transactions in Colonial South India: The Making of Protestant Tamil Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Karamustafa, Ahmet T. 2017. “Islamic Din as an Alternative to Western Models of ‘Religion’.” In Religion, Theory, Critique: Classic and Contemporary Approaches and Methodologies, edited by Richard Kind, 163–171. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Lynne. 2005. Translation and Religion: Holy Untranslatable? Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mandair, Arvind Pal. 2009. Religion and the Specter of the West: Sikhism, India, Postcoloniality, and the Politics of Translation Mandair. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandair, Arvind Pal. 2017. “Translation.” In Religion, Theory, Critique: Classic and Contemporary Approaches and Methodologies, edited by Richard Kind, 173–186. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masuzawa, Tomoko. 2005. The Invention of World Religions, Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Neather, Robert. Forthcoming. “Collaborative Translation and the Transmission of Buddhism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives.” In Routledge Handbook of Translation and Religion, edited by Hephzibah Israel. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, Eugene A. 1964. Towards a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, Eugene A. 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E.J. Brill for the United Bible Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Niranjana, Tejaswini. 1992. Siting Translation: History, Post-Structuralism, and the Colonial Context. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Nord, Christiane. 1997. Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester: ST. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Nord, Christiane. 2003. “Function and Loyalty in Bible Translation.” In Apropos of Ideology. Translation Studies on Ideology-ideologies in Translation Studies, edited by M. Calzada Perez, 89–112. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, Mary Louise. 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, Anthony. 1992. Translation and Text Transfer: An Essay on the Principles of Intercultural Communication. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, Anthony. 2007. “The Metalanguage of Translation.” Target 19 (2): 271–294. doi: 10.1075/target.19.2.07pym
   Google Scholar
• Pym, Anthony. 2010. Exploring Translation Theories. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rocher, Ludo. 1984. Ezourvedam: A French Veda of the Eighteenth Century. Amsterdam: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. [1929] 1958. “The Status of Linguistics as a Science.” In Culture, Language and Personality, edited by D. G. Mandelbaum, 160–166. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidmen, Naomi. 2006. Faithful Renderings: Jewish-Christian Difference and the Politics of Translation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1963. The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Jonathan Z. 1982. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. [1963] 2008. “‘Religion’ in the West.” In Readings in the Theory of Religion: Map, Text, Body, edited by Scott S. Elliott, and Matthew Waggoner, 5–40. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• St. André, James. 2010. “Lessons From Chinese History: Translation as a Collaborative and Multi-Stage Process.” TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction 23 (1): 71–94. doi: 10.7202/044929ar
   Google Scholar
• Sturge, Kate. 2007. Representing Others: Translation, Ethnography and the Museum. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Sugirtharajah, Sharada. 2003. Imagining Hinduism: A Postcolonial Perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetman, Will. 2003. Mapping Hinduism: “Hinduism” and the Study of Indian Religions 1600–1776. Halle: Verlag der Franckeschen Stiftungen zu Halle.
   Google Scholar
• Tambiah, Stanley J. 1990. Magic, Science and Religion and the Scope of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toury, Gideon. 1980. In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tymoczko, Maria. 2007. Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Tymoczko, Maria, and Edwin Gentzler. 2002. Translation and Power. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, E. 1999. “Liberatiing Calibans: Readings of Antropofagia and Haroldo de Campos’ Poetics of Transcreation.” In Post-colonial Translation: Theory and Practice, edited by S. Bassnett, and H. Trivedi, 95–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation.” Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Giselle, and E. S. Leedham-Green, eds. 2010. Identity. The Darwin College Lectures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Alan. 2004. “New Approaches to the Problem of Translation in the Study of Religion.” In New Approaches to the Study of Religion, edited by Peter Antes, Armin W. Geertz, and R. R. Warne, Vol. 2, 13–44. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar