Clinical Violence on Bioprecarious Bodies in Kishwar Desai’s Origins of Love

Works cited

• Abell-Selby, Emma. “Power in the Face of Indian Surrogacy.” Somatosphere: Science, Medicine, and Anthropology, 2019, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth S. “Is Women’s Labor a Commodity?” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 19, no. 1, 1990, pp. 71–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Lori B. “The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on Surrogate Motherhood.” The Hastings Center Report, vol. 17, no. 5, 1987, pp. 31–40. doi:10.2307/3562669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Brenda M. “A Case for Permitting Altruistic Surrogacy.” Hypatia, vol. 11, no. 2, 1996, pp. 34–48. doi:10.2979/hyp.1996.11.2.34.
   Google Scholar
• Bhadra, Bula. “Precarity and Surrogacy: The Invisible Umbilical Cord in the Digital Age.” Precarity within the Digital Age: Media Change and Social Security, edited by Birte Heidkamp-Kergel and David Kergel, Springer, 2017, pp. 31–68. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-17678-5_3.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, Eric. “I Wanted to Be Interesting: I Wanted to be Able to Say I Have Done Something Interesting in My Life: Interviews with Surrogate Mothers in Britain.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 12, no. 3, 1994, pp. 189–98. doi:10.1080/02646839408408885.
   Google Scholar
• Brinig, Margaret F. “A Maternalistic Approach to Surrogacy: Comment on Richard Epstein’s Surrogacy: The Case for Full Contractual Enforcement.” Virginia Law Review, vol. 81, no. 8, 1995, pp. 2377–99. doi:10.2307/1073582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Wendy. “NeoLiberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy.” Theory & Event, vol. 7, no. 1, 2003. doi: 10.1353/tae.2003.0020.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Wendy. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Zone Books, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, Graham. “Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self.” Economy & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, 1993, pp. 267–82. doi:10.1080/03085149300000018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. “Performativity, Precarity and Sexual Politics. Lecture Given at Universidad Complutense de Madrid.” Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, vol. 4, no. 3, 2009, pp. i–xiii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Ben. “Racialization, Genes and the Reinventions of Nation in Europe.” Race, Ethnicity and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics, edited by Peter Wade, Berghahn Books, 2007, pp. 95–124.
   Google Scholar
• Casarino, Cesare. “Sexual Difference beyond Life and Death.” Angelaki, vol. 17, no. 2, 2012, pp. 95–103. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2012.701050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervi, Lucia, and Joanna Brewis. “Fertility Treatment and Organisational Discourses of the Non-Reproductive Female Body.” Gender Work and Organization, vol. 29, no. 1, 2021, pp. 8–27. doi:10.1111/gwao.12733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Melinda. Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era, U of Washington P, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Melinda, and Catherine Waldby. Clinical Labour: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy, Duke UP, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Corea, Gena. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs, Harper & Row, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• DasGupta, Sayantani, and Shamita D. Dasgupta. “Motherhood Jeopardized: Reproductive Technologies in Indian Communities.” The Globalization of Motherhood: Deconstructions and Reconstructions of Biology and Care, edited by Wendy Chavkin and Jane Maree Maher, Routledge, 2010, pp. 131–53.
   Google Scholar
• “The Deeply Entrenched Communalism and Casteism Permeate as Occasional Outbursts of Violence against the Poor and Vulnerable.” Insights on India, 2021, www.insightsonindia.com/2021/10/01/the-deeply-entrenched-communalism-and-casteism-permeates-as-occasional-outbursts-of-violence-against-the-poor-and-vulnerable-analyse. Accessed 5 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, Kishwar. Origins of Love. Simon & Schuster India, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, Donna. Body Shopping: The Economy Fueled by Flesh and Blood. Oneworld Publications, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Donzelot, Jacques. L’invention du Social. Essai sur le déclin des passions politiques. Fayard, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, Roberto. Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy. U of Minnesota P, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fabre, Cecile. “Surrogacy.” International Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by Hugh LaFollette, Blackwell Ltd, 2013, pp. 5086–92. doi:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee123.
   Google Scholar
• Fegitz, Ella. “Neoliberalism Feminism in Old Age: Femininity, Work and Retirement in the Aftermath of the Great Recession.” Gender, Work and Organisation, vol. 29, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1815–30. doi:10.1111/gwao.12879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, Julia L. “Biomedicine and Technocratic Power.” The Hastings Center Report, vol. 20, no. 4, 1990, pp. 13–16. doi:10.2307/3562760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. “Governmentality.” The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Graham Burchell, et al., U of Chicago P, 1991, pp. 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley. Pantheon Books, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Power Knowledge. Random House, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Sarah. “Biologization Revisited: Kinship Theory in the Context of the New Biologies.” Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, edited by Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon, Duke UP, 2001, pp. 302–22.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Gabrielle, and Doris Leibetseder. Bodily Interventions and Intimate Labour: Understanding Bioprecarity. 1st, Manchester UP, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Jyotsana A. “Women’s Bodies: The Site for the Ongoing Conquest by Reproductive Technologies.” Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering: Journal of International Feminist Analysis, vol. 4, no. 2, 1991, pp. 93–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta, Jyotsana A, and Annemiek Richters. “Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Objects: Women’s Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and the Right to Self-Determination.” Bioethical Inquiry, vol. 5, no. 4, 2008, pp. 239–49. doi:10.1007/s11673-008-9112-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. “The ‘New’ Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession.” Socialist Register, vol. 40, 2004, www.socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5811. Accessed 17 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitson, Gillian. “The Commodified Womb and Neoliberal Families.” Review of Radical Political Economics, vol. 46, no. 4, 2014, pp. 489–95. doi:10.1177/0486613414537989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie. “Back Stage of the Global Free Market: Nannies and Surrogates.” Transnationale Vergesellschaftungen, edited by Hans-Georg Soeffner, Springer VS, 2012, pp. 1125–1138.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Ian, and Li Cao. “China Experiences a Booming Underground Market in Surrogate Motherhood.” The New York Times, 2014, www.nytimes.com/2014/08/03/world/asia/china-experiences-a-booming-black-market-in-child-surrogacy.html. Accessed 17 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Colin, and Roy Porter. Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine, and the Body. Routledge, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Karmakar, Manali, and Avishek Parui. “Shadowy Objects in the Test Tubes: Biocitizenship, Disposable Bodies, and Wasted Lives in Hanif Kureishi’s ‘The Body’ and Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, vol. 12, no. 6, 2020, pp. 1–12. doi:10.21659/rupkatha.v12n6.04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keegan, Laureen. “Book Review: Origins of Love by Kishwar Desai.” Lauren Keegan Writer, 2012, laurenkeeganwriter.com/2012/06/12/book-review-origins-of-love. Accessed 23 Jan. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Krolokke, Charlotte, et al. “The Commodification of Motherhood: Surrogacy as a Matter of Choice.” Contemplating Maternity in an Era of Choice, edited by Sara Hayden and D. Lynn O’Brien Hallstein, Lexington Books, 2010, pp. 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Thomas. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York UP, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Limki, Rashné. “On the Coloniality of Work: Commercial Surrogacy in India.” Gender, Work, and Organization, vol. 25, no. 4, July 2018, pp. 327–42. doi:10.1111/gwao.12220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorey, Isabell. “Governmental Precarization.” Transversal Texts. 2011. eipcp.net/transversal/0811/lorey/en. Accessed 24 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar, Anindita. “The Rhetoric of Choice: The Feminist Debates on Reproductive Choice in the Commercial Surrogacy Arrangement in India.” Gender, Technology and Development, vol. 18, no. 2, 2014, pp. 275–301. doi: 10.1177/0971852414529484.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar, Anindita. “Transnational Surrogacy: The ‘Public’ Selection of Selective Discourse.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 48, no. 45–46, 2013, pp. 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Markens, S. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. U of California P, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, Ana Cristina, and Lisa Lau. “India through Re-Orientalist Lenses.” Interventions, vol. 17, no. 5, Sept 2015, pp. 706–27. doi: 10.1080/1369801x.2014.984619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Catherine. The Routledge Handbook of Biopolitics. Routledge, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nadimpally, Sarojini, et al. “Commercial Surrogacy: A Contested Terrain in the Realm of Rights and Justice.” Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women, 2016, arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/accessible%20pdf-9944/index.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Elina. “Precarious Pregnancies and Precarious Products: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in Thailand.” Bodily Interventions and Intimate Labour: Understanding Bioprecarity, edited by Gabriele Griffin and Doris Leibetseder, Manchester UP, 2020, pp. 113–130.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, Rob. “Slow Violence, Gender, and the Environmentalism of the Poor.” Postcolonial Studies, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015, pp. 515–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nyong’o, Tavia. “Situating Precarity between the Body and the Commons.” Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, vol. 23, no. 2, 2013, pp. 157–73. doi:10.1080/0740770X.2013.825440.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, Amrita. “‘At Least I Am Not Sleeping with Anyone’: Resisting the Stigma of Commercial Surrogacy in India.” Feminist Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, 2010, pp. 292–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, Amrita. “‘It May Be Her Eggs, but It’s My Blood’: Surrogates and Everyday Forms of Kinship in India.” Qualitative Sociology, vol. 32, no. 4, 2009, pp. 379–97. doi:10.1007/s11133-009-9138-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, Amrita. “Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker.” Signs, vol. 35, no. 4, 2010, pp. 969–92. doi:10.1086/651043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadeer, Imrana. “Social and Ethical Basis of Legislation on Surrogacy: Need for Debate.” Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, no. 1, 2009. doi: 10.20529/ijme.2009.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qadeer, Imrana, and Mary John. “The Business and Ethics of Surrogacy.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 44, no. 2, 2009, pp. 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ragone, H. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Westview P, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, Mohan. “Why All Non-Altruistic Surrogacy Should Be Banned.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 47, no. 21, 2012, pp. 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, Rayna. “Reproductive Entanglements: Body, State, and Culture in the Dys/Regulation of Child-Bearing.” Social Research, vol. 78, no. 3, 2011, pp. 693–718. doi: 10.1353/sor.2011.0059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, Janice G. Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technologies and the Battle over Women’s Freedom. Harper Collins, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, Jaya. “Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labour.” Santa Clara Journal of International Law, vol. 18, no. 1, 2020, pp. 92–123.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. “Governing Advanced Liberal Democracies.” Foucault and Political Reason Liberalism, neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government, edited by A. Barry, et al., Routledge, 1996, pp. 37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. “Medicine, History and the Present.” Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body, edited by C. Jones and R. Porter, Routledge, 1994, pp. 48–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton UP, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas, and Peter Miller. “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government.” Foucault and Law, Routledge, 2017, pp. 191–224. doi:10.4324/9781315094021-9.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, Barbara K. “Reproductive Technology and the Commodification of Life.” Women & Health, vol. 13, no. 1–2, 1987, pp. 95–100. doi:10.1300/j013v13n01_08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, Modhumita. “Dangerous Desires and Abjected Lives: Baby-Hunger, Coerced Surrogacy, and Family-Making in Michael Robotham’s the Night Ferry.” The Politics of Reproduction. Adoption, Abortion, and Surrogacy in the Age of Neoliberalism, edited by M. Roy and M. Thompson, The Ohio State University Press, 2019, pp. 225–240.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, Modhumita, and Mary Thompson. The Politics of Reproduction. Adoption, Abortion, and Surrogacy in the Age of Neoliberalism. The Ohio State UP, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rozée, Virginie, et al. “Sociodemographic Characteristics of 96 Indian Surrogates: Are They Disadvantaged Compared with the General Population?” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 3, 2019, pp. e0214097. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214097. PMID: 30908500; PMCID: PMC6433248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudrappa, Sharmila. “Reproducing Dystopia: The Politics of Transnational Surrogacy in India, 2002–2015.” Critical Sociology, vol. 44, no. 7–8, 2018, pp. 1087–101. doi:10.1177/0896920517740616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan, Sheela. “Transnational Surrogacy and Objectification of Gestational Mothers.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 45, no. 16, 2010, pp. 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, Saskia. “Women’s Burden: Counter Geographies of Globalization and the Feminization of Survival.” Journal of International Affairs, vol. 53, no. 2, 2000, pp. 503–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Eva, and Isha Malhotra. “‘Wombs-for-Hire’: Biopolitics and Neoliberal Eugenics of Indian Commercial Surrogacy Industry in Amulya Malladi’s A House for Happy Mothers.” Media Watch, vol. 12, no. 1, 2021, pp. 67–78. doi:10.15655/mw/2021/v12i1/205459.
   Google Scholar
• Shenk, Tim. “What Exactly Is Neoliberalism? Interview with Wendy Brown.“ Dissent, 2015, www.dissentmagazine.org/blog/booked-3-what-exactly-is-neoliberalism-wendy-brown-undoing-the-demos. Accessed 19 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Solinger, Rickie. Beggars and Choosers: How the Politics of Choice Shapes Adoption, Abortion, and Welfare in the United States. Hill and Wang, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Spallone, Patricia. Beyond Conception: The New Politics of Reproduction. Macmillan Education Ltd, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Spar, Debora. “For Love and Money: The Political Economy of Commercial Surrogacy.” Review of International Political Economy, vol. 12, no. 5, 2005, pp. 287–309. doi:10.1080/09692290500105615.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester UP, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• subRosa. “Stolen Rhetoric: The Appropriation of Choice by ART Industries.” Shaping Technologies, 2003, pp. 110–18.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Charis. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. MIT P, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Till, Christopher. “Genetic Technologies of the Self.” This is Not a Sociology Blog, 2017, thisisnotasociology.blog/2017/11/08/genetic-technologies-of-the–self. Accessed 5 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, Olga B.A. “Functions and Responsibilities of Organisations Dealing with Surrogate Motherhood.” Human Fertility, vol. 1, no. 1, 1998, pp. 10–13. doi:10.1080/1464727982000198031.
   Google Scholar
• Vlasenko, Polina. Biopower and Precarity: Meeting Embodied Self in the Discourses of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. 2013. Lund U, PhD Dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Vora, Kalindi. “Indian Transnational Surrogacy and the Disaggregation of Mothering Work.” Anthropology News, vol. 50, no. 2, 2009, pp. 9–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-3502.2009.50209.x.
   Google Scholar
• Vora, Kalindi. Life Support: Biocapital and the New History of Outsourced Labor. U of Minnesota P, 2015.
   Google Scholar