Advanced search
Publication Cover
American Orthoptic Journal Volume 38, 1988 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
3
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium: Preschool/School Vision and Eye Screening: Current Techniques and Future Trends

A Comparison of Visual Acuity Testers to the Preferential Looking 20/20 Vision Tester

Patricia F. JenkinsUniversity of Texas Medical School at Houston, The Department of Ophthalmology, Houston, Texas
, C.O.,
Thomas C. PragerUniversity of Texas Medical School at Houston, The Department of Ophthalmology, Houston, Texas
, Ph.D. &
Malcolm L. MazowUniversity of Texas Medical School at Houston, The Department of Ophthalmology, Houston, Texas
, M.D.
Pages 38-42 | Published online: 05 Apr 2018

References

  • Fantz RL: A method for studying early visual development. Percept Motor Skills. 1956; 6: 13–15.
  • Braverman D, Quoted from Clark T: New infant vision tester gives accurate results, saves time. Ophthalmol Times. 1986; 11(17):39.
  • Jenkins PL, Simon JW, Kandel GL, Forster T: A simple grating visual acuity test for impaired children. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99(6): 652–658.
  • Harris SJ, Hansen RM, Fulton AB: Assessment of acuity of amblyopic subjects using face, grating, and recognition stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986; 27(7):1184–1187.
  • Catalano RA, Simon JW, Jenkins PL, Kandel GL: Preferential looking as a guide for amblyopic therapy in monocular infantile cataracts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1987; 24(2): 56–63.
  • Birch EE, Stager DR, Wright WW: Grating acuity development after early surgery for congenital unilateral cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986; 104(12):1783–1787.
  • Moore B: The fitting of contact lenses in aphakic infants. J Am Optomet Assoc. 1985; 53(3):180, 182–183.
  • Mohindra I, Jacobson SG, Held R: Binocular visual form deprivation in human infants. Doc Ophthalmol. 1983; 55(3):237–249.
  • Manning KA, Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Mayer DL, Peterson RA, Barg DC: Preferential looking vision testing: Application to evaluation of high-risk, prematurely born infants and children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1982; 19(6):286–293.
  • Mayer DL, Rodier D, Fulton AB: Preferential looking in the pediatric eye clinic. The Prism AACO Newsletter. July, 1987.
  • Lundh BL: Two years' clinical experience with the preferential looking technique for visual acuity determination in infants and young children. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1986; 64(6): 674–680.
  • Stager DR, Birch EE: Preferential looking acuity in stereopsis and infantile esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol and Strabismus. 1987; 23(4):160–165.
  • Lennerstrand G, Andersson G, Axelsson A: Clinical assessment of visual function in infants and young children. Acta Ophthalmol [Suppl] (Copenh). 1985; 157:63–67.
  • Gwiazda J, Wolfe JM, Brill S, Mohindra I, Held R: Quick assessment of preferential looking acuity in infants. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980; 57(7):420–427.
  • Hoyt CS: Objective techniques of visual acuity assessment in infancy. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol. 1986; 14(3):205–209.
  • Mayer DL: Acuity of amblyopic children for small field grating and recognition stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986; 27(7):1148–1153.
  • Mayer DL, Fulton AB, Rodier D: Grating in recognition acuities in pediatric patients. Ophthalmol. 1984; 91(8):947–953.
  • Fulton AB, Manning KA, Dobson V: Infant vision testing by a behavioral method. Ophthalmol. 1979; 86(3):431–439.
  • Ohen, (redone by) Gorman IJ, Cugan DG, Gelles SS: An apparatus for grading visual acuity of infants on the basis of optokinetic nystagmus. Pediatr, 1957; 11:179.
  • Guenther G, Poser H: Report on the objective and subjective determination of visual acuity with the nystagmovisometer. Graefe Arch Ophthalmol. 1960; 162:511–517.
  • Campbell FW, Maffei L: Electrophysiological evidence for existence of orientation and size detectors in human visual system. J Physiol (Lond). 1970; 207:635–652.
  • Pirchio M, Spinelli D, Fiorentini A, et al: Infant contrast sensitivity evaluated by evoked potentials. Brain Research. 1978; 141(1):179–184.
  • Sokol S, Hansen VC, Moskowitz A, Greenfield P, Towle VL: Evoked potential and preferential looking estimates of visual acuity in pediatric patients. Ophthalmol. 1983; 90(5):552–562.
  • Jenkins PF, Prager TC, Mazow ML, Allen SB, Russek MG: Preliterate vision screening: A comparative study. Am Orthopt J. 1983; 33: 91–98.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.