(Almost) everything you wanted to know about the history of the theory of production/the firm: but were afraid (too bored) to ask

References

• Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E. (2002). The ordinary business of life: A history of economics from the ancient world to the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G., & Murphy, K. M. (1992). The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), 1137–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenburg, S., & Harcourt, G. (2007). The debates on the representative firm and increasing returns: Then and now. In P. Arestis, M. Baddelely, & J. S. L. McCombie (Eds.), Economic growth, new directions in theory and policy (pp. 44–64). London: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (1985). Economic theory in retrospect (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (2001). No history of ideas, please, we're economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, H. R. (1955). The business enterprise as a subject for research: Prepared for the committee on business enterprise research (Pamphlet No. 11). Social Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, E. H. (1933). The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, S. F. (2008). Limited liability and freedom. In S. F. Copp (Ed.), The legal foundations of free markets (pp. 158–190). London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Cournot, A. (1838). Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Dari-Mattiacci, G., Gelderblom, O., Jonker, J., & Perotti, E. C. (2017). The emergence of the corporate form. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 33(2), 193–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. (1988a). The theory of the firm revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(1), 141–61.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. (1988b). Profit as a functional return: Reconsidering Knight's views. In H. Demsetz (Ed.), Ownership, control, and the firm: The organization of economic activity (vol. I, pp. 236–247). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, K., & Parente, S. L. (2009). The evolution of markets and the revolution of industry: A quantitative model of England's development, 1300–2000. EFIGE working paper 05 April.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue, M. (2020). Adam Smith and the Honourable East India Company. History of Economics Review, 77(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/10370196.2020.1794559.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E., & Hamilton, M. (2018). Companies and the rise of economic thought: The institutional foundations of early economics in England, 1550–1720. American Journal of Sociology, 124(1), 111–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. (1994). The biological analogy and the theory of the firm: Marshall and monopolistic competition. Journal of Economic Issues, 28(4), 1115–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. (1996). The ‘alternative’ theories of Knight and Coase, and the modern theory of the firm. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 18(1), 76–95.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. (2000). The theory of the firm: An introduction to themes and contributions. In N. Foss (Ed.), The theory of the firm: Critical perspectives on business and management (pp. xv–lxi). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2006). The emergence of the modern theory of the firm (SMG Working Paper 1/2006, January). Center for Strategic Management and Globalization, Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. K. (1925). The significance of Industrial integration. Journal of Political Economy, 33(2), 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. W. (2000). The legacy of Augustin Cournot. Cahiers d'Economie Politique, 37(1), 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gary-Bobo, R. (1989). Cournot, a Great Forerunner of mathematical economics. European Economic Review, 33(2-3), 515–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelderblom, O., De Jong, A., & Jonker, J. (2013). The formative years of the modern corporation: The Dutch East India Company VOC, 1602–1623. The Journal of Economic History, 73(4), 1050–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilibert, G. (2008). Classical theories of production. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new palgrave: A dictionary of economics, 2nd ed. (pp. 823–826). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2000a). The essential role of organizational law. Yale Law Journal, 110(3), 387–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2000b). Organizational law as asset partitioning. European Economic Review, 44(4–6), 807–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R., & Squire, R. (2005). The new business entities in evolutionary perspective. University of Illinois Law Review, 2005(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R., & Squire, R. (2006). Law and the rise of the firm. Harvard Law Review, 119(5), 1333–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2000). Industrializing English law: Entrepreneurship and business organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2020). Going the distance: Eurasian trade and the rise of the business corporation, 1400–1700. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, N. (2003). Marshall's dilemma: Equilibrium versus evolution. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(4), 1139–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, O. D. (2003). Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public-private partnerships. Economic Journal, 113(486), C69–C76. No. 486 Conference Papers March: C69-C76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. E. (1996). The origins of the representative agent. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2), 169–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckscher, E. F. (1994). Mercantilism (2 vols.). Routledge. First published, in Swedish, in 1931. First published in English in 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, C. R., & Turner, J. D. (2006). Corporation or limited liability company. In J. J. McCusker (Ed.), History of world trade since 1450 (vol. 1 A-K, pp. 163–166). New York, NY: Macmillan Reference USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. (1961). The representative firm and imperfect competition. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 27(2), 236–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (1966). The role of spending in physiocratic theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(4), 616–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2), 297–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lafontaine, F., & Slade, M. (2007). Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 629–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebergott, S. (1966). Labor force and employment, 1800–1960. In D. S. Brady (Ed.), Output, employment, and productivity in the United States after 1800 (pp. 117–204). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Leibenstein, H. (1979). A branch of economics is missing: Micro-micro theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 17(2), 477–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgregor, D. H. (1949). Economic thought and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, L. G. (1994). Mercantilism: The shaping of economic language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Industry and trade: A study of industrial technique and business organization; and of their influences on the conditions of various classes and nations (2 vols.). Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (2009). Principles of economics (Unabridged 8th ed.). Cosimo, Inc. Eighth edition first published 1920. First edition 1890.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (1958). Some Marshallian concepts, especially the representative firm. The Economic Journal, 68(272), 691–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. (2002). Reinventing the bazaar: A natural history of markets. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty, P. J. (1984). On the nature and theory of economic organization: The role of the firm reconsidered. History of Political Economy, 16(2), 233–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. (2000). The rise and fall of the factory system: Technology, firms, and households since the industrial revolution. Prepared for the Carnegie-Rochester Conference on macroeconomics, Pittsburgh, November 17–19, 2000. Departments of Economics and History, Northwestern University, January 1.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, S. (1984). The history of the theory of the firm from Marshall to Robinson and Chamberlin: The source of positivism in economics. Economica, 51(203), 307–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. F. (1951). Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D. P. (2003). Classical economics. In W. J. Samuels, J. E. Biddle, & J. B. Davis (Eds.), A companion to the history of economic thought (pp. 112–129). London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D. P. (2004). The classical economists revisited. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Opocher, A., & Steedman, I. (2008). The industry supply curve: Two different traditions. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15(2), 247–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. (1928). An analysis of supply. Economic Journal, 38(150), 238–257.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, M. T. (2018). The O-ring theory of the firm. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 27(1), 82–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. (1928). The representative firm. Economic Journal, 38(151), 387–404.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, E. A. G. (1931). The structure of competitive industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (1933). The economics of imperfect competition. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. (1967). The years of high theory: Invention and tradition in economic thought 1926–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, H. A. (1933). The limited companies of 1863–1883. Economic History Review, 4(3), 290–316.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Volumes I and II, R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (general Eds.), W. B. Todd (textual ed.). Liberty Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. (1926). The laws of returns under competitive conditions. Economic Journal, 36(144), 535–550.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, R. (2019). An essay on the production of wealth. Delhi: Facsimile Publisher. First published 1821.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. D. (2017). The development of English company law before 1900 (QUCEH Working Paper Series, No. 2017-01). Queen's University Centre for Economic History (QUCEH).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, P. (2018). A brief prehistory of the theory of the firm. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, P. (2021). Foundations of organisational economics: Histories and theories of the firm and production. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, P. (2022). The theory of the firm: An overview of the economic mainstream (Revised ed.). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3766453.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (2022). Diversified firms: Existence and behaviors. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(3), 345–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, E. (1940). A history of economic ideas. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. L. (1978). The emergence of the theory of the firm: From Adam Smith to Alfred Marshall. London: The Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1971). The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. American Economic Review, 61(2), 112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. N. (1954). The representative firm. Economic Journal, 64(254), 337–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. G. (1919). Cost of production and price. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 33(3), 560–567.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. A. (1928). Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal, 38(152), 527–542.
   Google Scholar