Grammaticalization Paths of Verbal Prefixes in Slavic and Other Indo-European Branches

References

• Abraham, W. 2003. “The Myth of Doubly Governing Prepositions in German”. In Motion, Direction and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Fraizyngier, edited by E. Shay and U. Seibert. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Daues, A. 2009. “Zum Funktionsbereich des Suffixes *-sk̑e/o- im Junghethitischen und Homerischen”. In Protolanguage and Prehistory, edited by R. Lühr and S. Ziegler. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 82–99.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, P. 2007. “A Fresh Look at Goal Motion Constructions”. In CLS 39-2: The Panels: Papers from the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, edited by J. Cihlar et al., Bloomington IN: Author House, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, S. M. 2005. “S-/Z- and the Grammaticalization of Aspect in Slavic”. Slovenski jezik – Slovene Linguistics Studies 5: 3–55.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, S. M. 2007. “A Prototype Account of the Development of Delimitative po- in Russian”. In Cognitive Paths into the Slavic Domain, edited by D. Divyak and A. Kochanska. Berlin: de Gruyter, 329–374.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, S. M. 2011. “The Varying Role of poin the Grammaticalization of Slavic Aspectual Systems: Sequences of Events, Delimitatives, and German Language Contact”. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 19, no.2:175–230. doi: 10.1353/jsl.2011.0009
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. 1999. Verb Semantics, Diathesis and Aspect. Munich: Lincom.
   Google Scholar
• Filip, H. 2003. “Prefixes and the Delimitation of Events”. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11, no: 1:55–101.
   Google Scholar
• Flier, M.S. 1985. “The Scope of Prefixal Delimitation in Russian”. In The Scope of Slavic Aspect, edited by M. S. Flier and A. Timberlake. Columbus OH: Slavica, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, A. 1996. “Wackernagel´s Law and Unaccusativity in Hittite”. In Approaching Second, edited by A. L. Halpern and A. M. Zwicky. Stanford CA: GSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Goedegebuure, P. M. 2007. “The Original Function of the Hittite Sentence Particle -kan: Topic Reinforcer or Marker of Spatial Relations?”. Review article of J. Boley, Dynamics of Transformation in Hittite. The Hittite Particles -kan, -asta and -san” (Innsbruck 2000). Bibliotheca Orientalis 64, no.1–2:31–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, M. R. 1987. “Notes on Wackernagel's Law in the Language of the Rigveda”. In Studies in Memory of Warren Cowgill (1929–1985). Untersuchungen zur Indogermanischen Sprachund Kulturwissenschaft, vol. 3, edited by C. Watkins. Berlin: de Gruyter, 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Haverling, G. 2000. On Sco-Verbs, Prefixes and Semantic Functions. A Study in the Development of Prefixed and Unprefixed Verbs from Early to Late Latin. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Haverling, G. V. M. 2010. “Actionality, Tense, and Viewpoint”. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, vol. 2, edited by P. Baldi and P. Cuzzolin, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 277–523.
   Google Scholar
• Herbers, B. 2002. Verbale Präfigierung im Mittelhochdeutschen. Eine semantisch-funktionale Korpusanalyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, L. A. 1985. “The Meaning of Russian Verbal Prefixes: Semantics and Grammar”. In The Scope of Slavic Aspect, edited by M. S. Flier and A. Timberlake, Columbus OH: Slavica Publishers, 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, L. A. 2007. “Aspectual Clusters of Russian Verbs”. Studies in Language 31 no. 3: 607–648.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, L. A. 2013. “Is Russian a Verb Classifier Language?”. In Categorisation and Category Change, edited by G. Iordăchioaia, I. Roy, and K. Takamine. Cambridge; Cambridge Scholars, 59–83.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, L. 2000. “Viewpoint Operators in European Languages”. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, edited by Ö. Dahl, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 27–187.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, F. 1995. “Directionality in Hittite”. In Kuryłowicz Memorial Volume. Part One, edited by W. Smoszyński. Cracow: University, 165–172.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, F. 2006a. “Début d'un emploi créatif de la langue Hittite”. In La langue poétique indo-européenne, edited by G.-J. Pinault and D. Petit. Leuven: Peters, 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, F. 2006b. “Old Irish and Slavic Prefixed Verbs and the Function of Prefixes”. In Parallels between Celtic and Slavic. Proceedings of the First International Colloquium of Societas Celto-Slavica Held at the University of Ulster, Coleraine, 19–21 June 2005, edited by S. Mac Mathúna and M. Fomin (= Studia Celtoslavica I.). Coleraine: The Stationary Office, 86–97.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, F. 2008. “Actionality and Aspect in Hittite”. In Interdependence of Diachronic and Synchronic Analyses, edited by F. Josephson and I. Söhrman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 131–147.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, F. 2009. “The Function of OI com, ad, ro and Similar Elements in Slavic”. In Studia Celto-Slavica II. Proceedings of the Second International Colloquium of Societas Celto-Slavica (Moscow 14–18 September 2006), edited by T. Michailova, S. Mac Mathúna, M. Fomin, and C. Bondarenko, Moscow: Philosophical Faculty of Moscow State University, 163–172.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, F. 2011. “Allative in Indo-European”. In Grammatical Case in the Languages of the Middle East and Europe, Acts of the International Colloquium Variations, concurrence et évolution des cas dans divers domaines linguistiques, Paris 2–4 Avril 2007, edited by M. Fruyt, M. Mazoyer, and D. Pardee, Chicago IL: Publications office of the Oriental Institute, 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, F. 2013. “Directionality, Case and Actionality in Hittite”. In Diachronic and Typological Perspectives on Verbs, edited by F. Josephson and I. Söhrman. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 383–409.
   Google Scholar
• Kuryłowicz, J. 1964. The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Langendonck, W. van. 1998. “The Dative in Latin and the Indirect Object in Dutch”. In The Dative, vol. 2. Theoretical and Contrastive Studies, edited by W. van Langendonck. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 185–259.
   Google Scholar
• Nørgård-Sørensen, J. 1997. “Tense, Aspect and Verbal Derivation in the Languages of the Novgorod Birch Bark Letters”. Russian Linguistics 21, 1–21. doi: 10.1023/A:1006871516003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Corráin, A. 2010. “On the Evolution of the Perfect in Irish”. In Celtic Language, Law and Letters. Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium of Societas Celtologica Nordica 2008, edited by Folke Josephson. Gothenburg: Meijerbergs institut för svensk etymologisk forskning, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pottier, B. 1962. Systématique des elements de relation. Études de syntaxe structurale romane. Paris: Klincksieck.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. 1985. “Aspectual Properties of the Russian Verbal Prefix na-”. In The Scope of Slavic Aspect, edited by M. S. Flier and A. Timberlake, Columbus OH: Slavica Publishers, 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. H. 1990. “On the Prehistory of Aspect and Tense in Old Irish”. Celtica 21:593–603.
   Google Scholar
• Schooneveld, C. H. van, 1978. Semantic Transmutations: Prolegomena to a Calculus of Meaning, vol I. The Cardinal Semantic Structure of Prepositions, Cases, and Paratactic Conjunctions in Contemporary Standard Russian. Bloomington IN: Phytsardt.
   Google Scholar
• Shull, S. 2003. The Experience of Space. The Privileged Role of Spatial Prefixation in Czech and Russian. Munich: Otto Sagner.
   Google Scholar
• Tatevosov. S. 2002. “The Parameter of Actionality”. Linguistic Typology 6:317–401.
   Google Scholar
• Tatevosov. S. 2003. “A Theory of Slavic Aspect and the Russian Delimitative”. In Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics, vol. II, edited by P. Kosta et al., Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang , 873–891.
   Google Scholar
• Zaliznjak, A. A. and A. D. Šmelev. 2000. Vvedenie v russkuju aspektologiju. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury.
   Google Scholar