Envisioning the Role of Facilitation in Public Deliberation

References

• Aakhus, M. (2001). Technocratic and design stances toward communication expertise: How GDSS facilitators understand their work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(4), 341–371. doi:10.1080/00909880128113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L. W., Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2011). Methods for analyzing and measuring group deliberation. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), Sourcebook of political communication research (pp. 323–345). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blong, L. (2008). Describing public deliberation in its actual practice: A study of National Issues Forums focusing on moderator communication. An unpublished report prepared for the Charles F. Kettering Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 4, 398–422. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., & Searing, D. D. (2005). Studying “everyday political talk” in the deliberative system. Acta Politica, 40(3), 269–283. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 21–62. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000029
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, N., & Nethercutt, D. (2005). Citizens' juries: Creating a trustworthy voice of the people. In J. Gastil & P. Levine (Eds.), The deliberative democracy handbook (pp. 111–119). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Daughtery, R. A., & Williams, S. E. (2007). Applications of public deliberation: Themes emerging from twelve personal experiences emanating from National Issues Forums training. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3, Article 10. Retrieved from http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol3/iss1/art10
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, K. N. (2011). Bringing facilitation back in: Re-envisioning the role of facilitators in public deliberations. An unpublished research report prepared for the Charles F. Kettering Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (2006). Introduction. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups, volume one (pp. 1–59). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2005). Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, 33(3), 397–419. doi:10.1177/0090591704271990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2008). Political communication and deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2000). By popular demand: Revitalizing representative democracy through deliberative elections. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Black, L. W. (2008). Public deliberation as the organizing principle of political communication research. Journal of Public Deliberation, 4, Article 3. Retrieved from http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol4/iss1/art3
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Black, L. W., Deess, E. P., & Leighter, J. (2008). From group member to democratic citizen: How deliberating with fellow jurors reshapes civic attitudes. Human Communication Research, 34(1), 137–169. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Burkhalter, S., & Black, L. W. (2007). Do juries deliberate? A study of deliberation, individual difference, and group member satisfaction at a municipal courthouse. Small Group Research, 38(3), 337–359. doi:10.1177/1046496407301967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P., & Meade, J. (2008). Jury service and electoral participation: A test of the participation hypothesis. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 351–367. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Dillard, J. P. (1999). The aims, methods, and effects of deliberative civic education through the National Issues Forums. Communication Education, 48(3), 179–192. doi:10.1080/03634529909379168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman, N. (2007). Bringing the mountain to the public: Dilemmas and the contradictions in the procedures of public deliberation initiatives that aim to get ordinary citizens to deliberate policy issues. Communication Theory, 17(4), 411–438. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226389899.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kadlec, A., Sprain, L., & Carcasson, M. (2012). Framing for democracy: Exploring the impacts of adversarial and deliberative framing, understanding the longer-term benefits of deliberation. Kettering Foundation Working Paper. Retrieved from http://kettering.org/publications/framing-for-democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Kaner, S. (2007). Facilitators guide to participatory decision-making. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk opinion and participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16(4), 361–385. doi:10.1080/105846099198541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, P., Fung, A., & Gastil, J. (2005). Future directions for public deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation, 1, Article 3. Retrieved from http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol1/iss1/art3
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Hartz-Karp, J., Amengual, M., & Gastil, J. (2006). Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation, 2, Article 7. Retrieved from http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol2/iss1/art7
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, J. F. (1996). Taking turns and taking sides: Opening scenes from two jury deliberations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(2), 107–125. doi:10.2307/2787046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, D. (1999). Politics for people. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. M., Holbert, W., Zubric, S., & Zubric, J. (1999). Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum. Communication Research, 26(6), 743–774. doi:10.1177/009365099026006005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville, K., Willingham, T. L., & Dedrick, J. R. (2005). National Issues Forums: A network of communities promoting public deliberation. In J. Gastil & P. Levine (Eds.), The deliberative democracy handbook (pp. 37–58). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T. (2002). The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. In M. X. Delli-Carpini, L. Huddy, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in micro politics: Political decision-making, deliberation, and participation (pp. 151–193). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T., & Karpowitz, C. (2007). How groups deliberate about justice: Groups, gender and decision rules. In S. W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation, and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 101–129). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/019929111X.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Reykowski, J. (2006). Deliberative democracy and “human nature”: An empirical approach. Political Psychology, 27(3), 323–346. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00516.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. (2003). Lessons from the field: Practitioner perspectives on public discourse programs. In J. Rodin & S. P. Steinberg (Eds.), Public discourse in America: Conversation and community in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. (2003). Restructuring the concept of deliberation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. W. (1988). Reason, ideology, and politics. Princeton, CA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. (2005). An empirical study of deliberative democracy: Setting a research agenda. Acta Politica, 40(2), 212–224. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. W. (2007). Types of discourse and the democracy of deliberation. In S. W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation, and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 130–158). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1057/9780230591080
   Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. M. (2006). Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(1), 72–93. doi:10.1080/00909880500420226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. M. (2005). Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 49–71. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, R. (2005). The skilled facilitator approach. In S. Schuman (Ed.), The IAF handbook of group facilitation (pp. 21–33). Los Angeles, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, B., & Kushlis, P. (2006). Empirically derived training techniques for facilitators of group discussions. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication, volume one (pp. 323–345). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sulkin, T., & Simon, A. F. (2001). Habermas in the lab: An experimental investigation of the effects of deliberation. Political Psychology, 22(4), 809–826. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M. R., Bachtiger, A., Sporndli, M., & Steiner, J. (2003). Deliberative politics in action: Analyzing parliamentary discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation's content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3, article 12. Retrieved from http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol3/iss1/art12
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. C. (2007). The democratic potential of civic dialogue. In S. W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation, and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 45–63). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Working Through Difficult Decisions. (2011). A Kettering Foundation Report. Retrieved from http://www.kettering.org/media_room/publications/working-through-difficult-decisions-2011.
   Google Scholar