Putting the U in carbon capture and storage: rhetorical boundary negotiation within the CCS/CCUS scientific community

References

• Advancing American Energy. (n.d.). Retrieved October 26, 2015 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/securing-american-energy.
   Google Scholar
• Baake, K. (2012). Metaphor and knowledge: The challenges of writing science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, L. R. V. (1995). Living room pilgrimages: Television’s cyclical commemoration of the assassination anniversary of John F. Kennedy. Communication Monographs, 62(1), 47–64. doi:10.1080/03637759509376347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakeslee, A. M. (2000). Interacting with audiences: Social influences on the production of scientific writing. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J., Ray, I., Peterson, T., Wade, S., Wong-Parodi, G., & Feldpausch, A. (2009). The role of social factors in shaping public perceptions of CCS: Results of multi-state focus group interviews in the U.S. Energy Procedia, 1, 4665–4672. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.289
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. (2001). Rhetorical criticism and the rhetoric of science. Western Journal of Communication, 65(3), 314–329. doi:10.1080/10570310109374708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit, C. (1996). How bad science stays that way: Brain sex, demarcation, and the status of truth in the rhetoric of science. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 26, 83–109. doi:10.2307/3886262
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy. (2008). 2008 carbon sequestration atlas of the United States and Canada (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy. (n.d.). Enhanced oil recovery. Retrieved June 20, 2015 from http://energy.gov/fe/science-innovation/oil-gas/enhanced-oil-recovery
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and U.S. National Energy Technology Laboratory. (2010). DOE/NETL carbon dioxide capture and storage RD&D roadmap. Retrieved August 23, 2016 from http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Carbon%20Seq/Reference%20Shelf/CCSRoadmap.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Derkatch, C. (2012). Demarcating medicine’s boundaries: Constituting and categorizing in the Journals of the American Medical Association. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21, 210–229. doi:10.1080/10572252.2012.663744
   Google Scholar
• Endres, D., Cozen, B., Barnett, J. T., O’Byrne, M., & Peterson, T. R. (2016). Communicating energy in a climate of crisis. In E. Cohen (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 40, pp. 419–447). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. B. (1989). Media rhetoric as social drama: The Winter Olympics of 1984. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6(2), 158–182. doi:10.1080/15295038909366742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldpausch-Parker, A. M., Chaudhry, R., Stephens, J. C., Fischlein, M., Hall, D. M., Melnick, L. L., … Wilson, E. J. (2011). A comparative state-level analysis of carbon capture and storage (CCS) discourse among U.S. energy stakeholders and the public. Energy Procedia, 4, 6368–6375. doi:10.1016/j.egypro2011.02.654
   Google Scholar
• Feldpausch-Parker, A. M., O’Byrne, M., Endres, D., & Peterson, T. R. (2013b). The adventures of carbon bond: Using a melodramatic game to explain CCS as a mitigation strategy for climate change. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 3, 21–29. doi:10.1002/ghg.1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldpausch-Parker, A. M., Ragland, C. J., Melnick, L. L., Chaudhry, R., Hall, D. M., Peterson, T. R., … Wilson, E. J. (2013a). Spreading the news on carbon capture and storage: A state-level comparison of US media. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7, 336–354. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.807859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuoss, K. W. (1995). “Community” contested, imagined, and performed: Cultural performance, contestation, and community in an organized labor social drama. Text and Performance Quarterly, 15(2), 79–98. doi:10.1080/10462939509366108
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, H. B. (2005). Rhetoric in(to) science: Style as invention in inquiry. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. (1984). Public debates as failed social dramas: The recombinant DNA controversy. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 397–409. doi:10.1080/00335638409383706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happe, K. E. (2013). The material gene: Gender, race, and heredity after the Human Genome Project. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, D. (1998). Locating genetic knowledge: Picturing Marfan syndrome and its traveling constituencies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 23, 71–97. doi:10.1177/016224399802300104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henke, C. R., & Gieryn, T. F. (2008). Sites of scientific practice: The enduring importance of place. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. E. Lynch, J. Wajcman, & W. E. Bijker (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 353–376). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, A. (2011). Critical-rhetorical ethnography: Rethinking the place and process of rhetoric. Communication Studies, 62(2), 127–152. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.529750
   Google Scholar
• Holmquest, A. (1990). The rhetorical strategy of boundary-work. Argumentation, 4, 235–258. doi:10.1007/BF00173966
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2005). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson, F. (2011). Perspectives on CO2 capture and storage. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 1, 119–133. doi:10.1002/ghg.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2005). Mapping misconduct: Demarcating legitimate science from “fraud” in the B-06 lumpectomy controversy. Argumentation and Advocacy, 42(2), 94–113.
   Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, M. J., & Palmer, J. S. (1992). Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J. (2001). Nuclear boundaries: Material and discursive containment at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Science as Culture, 10, 163–194. doi:10.1080/09505430120052284
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J., Kelly, A. R., & Autry, M. K. (2013). Risk, regulation, and rhetorical boundaries: Claims and challenges surrounding a purported nuclear renaissance. Communication Monographs, 80, 278–301. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.788253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, W. (2011). Migratory birds, migratory scientists, and shifting fields: The political ecology of a northern coastline. In S. Coleman & P. von Hellerman (Eds.), Multi-sited ethnography: Problems and possibilities in the translocation of research methods (pp. 146–160). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuuskraa, V., Van Leeuwen, T., & Wallace, M. (2011, June 20). Improving domestic energy security and lowering CO₂ emissions with “next generation” CO₂-enhanced oil recovery (CO₂-EOR). Washington, DC: National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy. Retrieved from http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/NextGen_CO2_EOR_06142011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1988). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, C. (2012, May 1). Adding “utilization” to carbon capture and storage. Retrieved May 22, 2012, from http://energy.gov/articles/adding-utilization-carbon-capture-and-storage
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M., Hess, A., Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2015). Participatory critical rhetoric: Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying rhetoric in situ. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K., Senda-Cook, S., & Endres, D. (2011). Articulating rhetorical field methods: Challenges and tensions. Western Journal of Communication, 75, 386–406. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.586969
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2003). Resisting “national breast cancer awareness month”: The rhetoric of counterpublics and their cultural performances. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89(4), 345–365. doi: 10.1080/0033563032000160981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploeger, J. S. (2009). The boundaries of the new frontier: Rhetoric and communication at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, M. F., & Wilson, E. J. (2009). Regulating geologic sequestration in the United States: Early rules take divergent approaches. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 3035–3041. doi:10.1021/es803094f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., Schwarze, S., Bsumek, P., & Peeples, J. (2016). Under pressure: Coal industry rhetoric and neoliberalism. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., Endres, D., & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Research as a transdisciplinary networked process: A metaphor for difference-making research. Communication Monographs, 77, 441–444. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2010.523600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (1996). Defining science: A rhetoric of demarcation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomski, P., Kuuskraa, V., & Moore, M. (2012). US policy shift to carbon capture, utilization, and storage driven by carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery. Washington, DC: The Atlantic Council.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1980). Social dramas and stories about them. Critical Inquiry, 7, 141–168. doi: 10.1086/448092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theater: The human seriousness of play. New York: PAJ Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1982). Laboratory studies: A comment on the state of the art. Social Studies of Science, 12, 481–498. doi:10.1177/030631282012004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar