What happens when brands tell the truth? Exploring the effects of transparency signaling on corporate reputation for agribusiness

References

• Alcañiz, E. B., Cáceres, R. C., & Pérez, R. C. (2010). Alliances between brands and social causes: The influence of company credibility on social responsibility image. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 169–186. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0461-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, J., & Cameron, G. T. (2006). Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bögel, P. M. (2015). Processing of CSR communication: Insights from the ELM. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 128–143. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0095
   Google Scholar
• Brønn, P. S., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2009). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 91–109. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9795-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83. doi: 10.1086/314309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. doi: 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C. E., & Einwiller, S. A. (2014). Disclosure alignment and transparency signaling in CSR reporting. In R. P. Hart (Ed.), Communication and language analysis in the corporate world (pp. 249–270). Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, T. W., & Holladay, S. J. (2013). The pseudo-panopticon: The illusion created by CSR-related transparency and the internet. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 212–227. doi: 10.1108/13563281311319490
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2011). Managing corporate social responsibility: A communication approach. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, A., & Hoyer, W. (1994). An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 561–574. doi: 10.1086/209370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157. doi: 10.1177/0092070305284976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerup-Nielsen, A., & Thomsen, C. (2007). Reporting CSR – what and how to say it? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(1), 25–40. doi: 10.1108/13563280710723732
   Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. (2000). The reputation QuotientSM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255. doi: 10.1057/bm.2000.10
   Google Scholar
• Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsman-Hugg, S., Katajajuuri, J. M., Riipi, I., Mäkelä, J., Järvelä, K., & Timonen, P. (2013). Key CSR dimensions for the food chain. British Food Journal, 115(1), 30–47. doi: 10.1108/00070701311289867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1086/209380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798. doi: 10.5465/amr.2005.18378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golob, U., & Bartlett, J. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golob, U., Lah, M., & Jančič, Z. (2008). Value orientations and consumer expectations of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 83–96. doi: 10.1080/13527260701856525
   Google Scholar
• Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639–652. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0834-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, J. M., & Choe, S. (1998). Trust in Japanese interfirm relations: Institutional sanctions matter. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 589–600. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.926628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallman, W. K., Hebden, W. C., Aquino, H. L., Cuite, C. L., & Lang, J. T. (2003). Public perceptions of genetically modifed foods: A national study of American knowledge and opinion. (Publication number RR-1003-004). New Jersey: Food Policy Institute, Cook College, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999a). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999b). Measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S. Y., & Rim, H. (2010). The influence of customer use of corporate websites: Corporate social responsibility, trust, and word-of-mouth communication. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 389–391. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9507312923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J., & Reber, B. H. (2011). Dimensions of disclosures: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting by media companies. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 166–168. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. H. (2001). Values of public relations: Effects on organization-public relationships mediating conflict resolution. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(4), 265–301. doi: 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1304_01
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. B., Anderson, A., & Golden, S. (2001). Corporate environmental disclosures: Are they useful in determining environmental performance? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20(3), 217–240. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00031-X
   Google Scholar
• Husillos, J., González, C. L., & Gil, M. J. Á. (2011). The emergence of triple bottom line reporting in Spain. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 40(150), 195–219. doi: 10.1080/02102412.2011.10779701
   Google Scholar
• Khan, H. U. Z., Halabi, A. K., & Samy, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: A study of selected banking companies in Bangladesh. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 344–357. doi: 10.1108/17471110910977276
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2017). The process model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with consumers’ CSR knowledge, trust, and corporate reputation perception. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Ferguson, M. T. (2016). Dimensions of effective CSR communication based on consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Communications, doi: 10.1080/13527266.2015.1118143
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, H., & Theuvsen, L. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in agribusiness: Literature review and future research directions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(4), 673–696. doi: 10.1007/s10806-016-9620-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, H., & Theuvsen, L. (2017). Corporate social responsibility: Exploring a framework for the agribusiness sector. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30(2), 241–253. doi: 10.1007/s10806-017-9665-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marszalek, J. M., Barber, C., Kohlhart, J., & Cooper, B. H. (2011). Sample size in psychological research over the past 30 years. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112(2), 331–348. doi: 10.2466/03.11.PMS.112.2.331-348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnies, E., & Ward, C. D. (1980). Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(3), 467–472. doi: 10.1177/014616728063023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. doi: 10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146. doi: 10.1086/208954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlins, B. (2008). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71–99. doi: 10.1080/10627260802153421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rim, H., & Ferguson, M. A. T. (2017). Proactive versus reactive CSR in a crisis: An impression management perspective. International Journal of Business Communication, doi: 10.1177/2329488417719835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rim, H., & Song, D. (2016). ‘How negative becomes less negative’: Understanding the effects of comment valence and response sidedness in social media. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 475–495. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, R. B., Pandey, V., & Ross, K. L. (2015). Sustainability and strategy in US agri-food firms: An assessment of current practices. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 18(1), 17–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumble, J. N., & Irani, T. (2016). Opening the doors to agriculture: The effect of transparent communication on attitude. Journal of Applied Communications, 100(2), 6. doi: 10.4148/1051-0834.1030
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, A. E. (2011). Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 226–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallera, F. L., & Bodzin, A. M. (2016). Knowledge, skills, or attitudes/beliefs: The contexts of agricultural literacy in upper-elementary science curricula. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(4), 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2009). ‘Too good to be true!’: The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 273–283. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9731-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170–180. doi: 10.1007/s11747-008-0117-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 77–91. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilburn, K. M., & Wilburn, R. (2011). Achieving social license to operate using stakeholder theory. Journal of International Business Ethics, 4(2), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. U. (2007). An integrated model for organization – public relational outcomes, organizational reputation, and their antecedents. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(2), 91–121. doi: 10.1080/10627260701290612
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar