794
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Communicating resilience in actual and imagined boundaries: narrative plots and meanings of retention in organizations

Pages 401-419 | Received 27 Jun 2017, Accepted 10 Jan 2019, Published online: 02 Sep 2019

References

  • Agarwal, V., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2015). Communicative reconstruction of resilience labor: Identity/identification in disaster-relief workers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43, 408–428. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2015.1083602
  • Aryee, S. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among married professional women: Evidence from Singapore. Human Relations, 45, 813–837. doi: 10.1177/001872679204500804
  • Balakrishnan, N. (1989). Battle of the sexes. Far Eastern Economic Review, 145, 34–35.
  • Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 20–28. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (2010). Resilience: Talking, resisting, and imagining new normalcies into being. Journal of Communication, 60, 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01469.x
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (2018). Organizing resilience as adaptive-transformative tensions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46, 14–18. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2018.1426711
  • Buzzanell, P. M., Long, Z., Anderson, L. B., Kokini, K., & Batra, J. C. (2015). Mentoring in Academe: A feminist poststructural lens on stories of women engineering faculty of color. Management Communication Quarterly, 29, 440–457. doi: 10.1177/0893318915574311
  • Buzzanell, P. M., & Turner, L. H. (2003). Emotion work revealed by job loss discourse: Backgrounding-foregrounding of feelings, construction of normalcy, and (re) institut- ing of traditional masculinities. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 27–57. doi: 10.1080/00909880305375
  • Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review, 80, 46–56.
  • Dorrance Hall, E. (2016). The communicative process of resilience for marginalized family members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, doi: 10.1177/0265407516683838
  • Dutta, D. (2015). Sustaining the pipeline: Experiences and negotiations of international women engineers in United States graduate programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 104, 326–344. doi: 10.1002/jee.20077
  • Dutta, D. (2016). Negotiations of cultural identities by Indian women engineering students in US engineering programmes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45, 177–195. doi: 10.1080/17475759.2016.1165727
  • Dutta, D. (2018). Women’s discourses of leadership in STEM organizations in Singapore: Negotiating sociocultural and organizational norms. Management Communication Quarterly, 32, 233–249. doi: 10.1177/0893318917731537
  • Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/03637758409390180
  • Frank, A. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hammoud, A., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2012). The most vulnerable … [and] most resilient people: Communicatively constituting Palestinian refugees’ resilience. In B. Omdahl & J. H. Fritz (Eds.), Problematic relationships at work (pp. 215–234). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Herman, D., Phelan, J., Rabinowitz, P. J., Richardson, B., & Warhol, R. (2012). Narrative theory. Ohio: The Ohio State University Press.
  • Inkson, J. (2007). Understanding careers: The metaphors of working lives. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
  • Jahn, J. L., & Myers, K. K. (2014). Vocational anticipatory socialization of adolescents: Messages, sources, and frameworks that influence interest in STEM careers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 85–106. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2013.874568
  • Jahn, J. L., & Myers, K. K. (2015). When will I use this? How math and science classes communicate impressions of stem careers: Implications for vocational anticipatory socialization. Communication Studies, 66, 218–237. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2014.990047
  • Kisselburgh, L. G., Berkelaar, B. L., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2009). Discourse, gender, and the meaning of work: Rearticulating science, technology, and engineering careers through communicative lenses. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 33 (pp. 384–408). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kunda, G. (2006). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high tech corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Lee, J. S. K., & Pow, J. C. L. (1999). Human resource policies for women-a study on Singapore. Journal of Management Development, 18, 326–341. doi: 10.1108/02621719910265522
  • Lee, J., & Win, H. N. (2004). Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24, 433–442. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00101-3
  • Long, Z., Buzzanell, P. M., Wu, M., Mitra, R., Kuang, K., & Suo, H. (2015). Global communication for organizing sustainability and resilience. China Media Research, 11, 67–78.
  • Lucas, K., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2012). Memorable messages of hard times: Constructing short-and long-term resiliencies through family communication. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 189–208. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2012.687196
  • Maguire, K. C., & Wilson, S. R. (2013). Introduction to the special section on communication and wartime deployment. Health Communication, 28, 749–753. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.802970
  • Maureira, T. M., & Stenbacka, S. (2015). Indigenous tourism and processes of resilience–about communicative strategies among tourism workers in Québec. Acta Borealia, 32, 148–170. doi: 10.1080/08003831.2015.1090204
  • Mukhopadhaya, P. (2014). Income inequality in Singapore. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mumby, D. K. (1987). The political function of narrative in organizations. Communication Monographs, 54, 113–127. doi: 10.1080/03637758709390221
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rosser, S. V. (2012). Breaking into the lab: Engineering progress for women in science. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  • Torres, D. H., & Fyke, J. P. (2013). Communicating resilience: A discursive leadership perspective. M/C Journal, 16, 6–6. Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/712
  • UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (2017). Women in science. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs43-women-in-science-2017-en.pdf
  • Villagran, M., Canzona, M. R., & Ledford, C. J. (2013). The milspouse battle rhythm: Communicating resilience throughout the deployment cycle. Health Communication, 28, 778–788. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.800441
  • Walters, J., & McNeely, C. L. (2010). Recasting Title IX: Addressing gender equity in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professoriate. Review of Policy Research, 27, 317–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00444.x
  • Wilson, S. R., Chernichky, S. M., Wilkum, K., & Owlett, J. S. (2014). Do family communication patterns buffer children from difficulties associated with a parent’s military deployment? Examining deployed and At-home parents’ perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 32–52. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2013.857325
  • Wilson, S. R., Wilkum, K., Chernichky, S. M., MacDermid Wadsworth, S. M., & Broniarczyk, K. M. (2011). Passport toward success: Description and evaluation of a program designed to help children and families reconnect after a military deployment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39, 223–249. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2011.585399
  • Wu, L., & Jing, W. (2011). Asian women in STEM careers: An invisible minority in a double bind. Issues in Science and Technology, 28, 82–85.
  • Xu, Y. J., & Martin, C. L. (2011). Gender differences in STEM disciplines: From the aspects of informal professional networking and faculty career development. Gender Issues, 28, 134–154. doi: 10.1007/s12147-011-9104-5
  • Yamasaki, J., Sharf, B. F., & Harter, L. M. (2014). Narrative inquiry: Attitude, acts, artifacts, and analysis. In B. Whaley (Ed.), Research methods in health communication: Principles and applications (pp. 99–118). New York, NY: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.