‘The balance is a forever moving one’: Chinese women entrepreneurs’ politics of reinscription when encountering nonhuman agents of control

References

• Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., Ashcraft, K. L., & Thomas, R. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407084426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. R., & Starnawska, M. (2008). Research Practices in Entrepreneurship. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 9(4), 221–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/000000008786208731
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L. (2021). Communication as constitutive transmission? An encounter with affect. Communication Theory, 31(4), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, K. J., Munshi, D., & Cruz, J. (2018). Releasing/translating agency: A postcolonial disruption of the master’s voice among Liberian market women. In B. H. J. M. Brummans (Ed.), The agency of organizing (pp. 123–141). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, C., Edelman, L., Manolova, T., & Welter, F. (2019). A gendered look at entrepreneurship ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9992-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2020). Beyond entanglement: (socio-) materiality and organization studies. Organization Theory, 1(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720954444
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (2019). On intersectionality: Selected writings. New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawney, L. (2013). The interruption: Investigating subjectivation and affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(4), 628–644. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2013). The evolution of organizational archetypes: From the American to the entrepreneurial dream. Communication Monographs, 80(3), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.788252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2019). 2018/2019 Women’s entrepreneurship report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-20182019-womens-entrepreneurship-report
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L. (2016). Feminist dilemmatic theorizing: New materialism in communication studies. Communication Theory, 26(2), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L., McFarlane, M. D., & Wieskamp, V. N. (2020). The promise and peril of agency as motion: A feminist new materialist approach to sexual violence and sexual harassment. Organization, 27(5), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419838697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, J. G., Scott, J. M., Harrison, R. T., & Millman, C. (2010). “Enter the dragoness”: Firm growth, finance, guanxi, and gender in China. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411011026302
   Google Scholar
• Inman, K. (2016). Women’s resources in business start-up: A study of black and white women entrepreneurs. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kriz, A., Gummesson, E., & Quazi, A. (2014). Methodology meets culture: Relational and Guanxi-oriented research in China. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 14(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595813493265
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & DaCosta, M. N. (2016). The enterprise reforms and entrepreneurial development in China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 21(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2015.1092280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Z., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2022). Constituting intersectional politics of reinscription: Women entrepreneurs’ resistance practices in China, Denmark, and the United States. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(2), 207–234. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211030246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maller, C. J. (2015). Understanding health through social practices: Performance and materiality in everyday life. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavin, S., & Grandy, G. (2016). A theory of abject appearance: Women elite leaders’ intra-gender ‘management’ of bodies and appearance. Human Relations, 69(5), 1095–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715609107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., Thomas, R., Martí, I., & Seidl, D. (2017). Resistance redux. Organization Studies, 38(9), 1157–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na’puti, T. R., & Cruz, J. M. (2022). Mapping interventions: Toward a decolonial and indigenous praxis across communication subfields. Communication, Culture and Critique, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring material-discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orser, B. J., Elliott, C., & Leck, J. (2011). Feminist attributes and entrepreneurial identity. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(8), 561–589. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411111183884
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, A., & Vachhani, S. (2021). Feminist ethics and women leaders: From difference to intercorporeality. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04526-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2017). Gender and organizational paradox. In W. K. Smith, M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 333–352). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinnar, R. S., Giacomin, O., & Janssen, F. (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, A. L., & Hsu, C. (2007). Corruption or social capital? Tact and the performance of guanxi in market socialist China. In M. Nuijten & G. Anders (Eds.), Corruption and the secret of law a legal anthropological perspective (pp. 167–189). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, J. (2008). Breaking the “bamboo curtain” and the “glass ceiling”: The experience of women entrepreneurs in high-tech industries in an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9454-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005a). What have the feminists done for us? Feminist theory and organizational resistance. Organization, 12(5), 711–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405055945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005b). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26(5), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605051821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Slocum, J. W. (2016). Managing corporate social responsibility in China. Organizational Dynamics, 45(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Z. (2023). Suzhi, guanxi, and the abject body: Nonhuman agents of paradox that perform identity work together with Chinese women political leaders. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221095615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative methodology methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Warfield, K. (2016). Making the cut: An agential realist examination of selfies and touch. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, D. H. B., Kaciak, E., Memili, E., & Zhou, Q. (2017). Work-family balance and marketing capabilities as determinants of Chinese women entrepreneurs’ firm performance. Journal of Global Marketing, 30(3), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2017.1317894
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Wang, C., Wu, J., Liang, Y., Jiao, Y., & Nazneen, S. (2018). Human poverty alleviation through rural women’s tourism entrepreneurship. Journal of China Tourism Research, 14(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2018.1507860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yep, G. A. (2016). Toward thick(er) intersectionalities: Theorizing, researching and activating the complexities of communication and identities. In K. Sorrells & S. Selimoto (Eds.), Globalizing intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 86–94). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, E. (2011). Are women entrepreneurs more likely to share power than men entrepreneurs in decision-making? International Journal of Business and Management, 6(4), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n4p
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2008). Neoliberal strategies, socialist legacies: Communication and state transformation in China. In P. C. Chakravartty & Y. Zhao (Eds.), Global communications: Toward a transcultural political economy (pp. 23–50). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar