Involvement, Tolerance for Ambiguity, and Type of Service Moderate the Effectiveness of Probability Marker Usage in Service Advertising

REFERENCES

• Aiken, LeonaS., and StephenG. West (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, RichardC. (1977), “The Notion of Schemata and the Educational Enterprise: General Discussion of the Conference,” in Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, RichardC. Anderson, R.J. Spiro, and W.E. Montague, eds., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 415–31.
   Google Scholar
• Areni, CharlesS. (2002), “The Proposition-Probability Model of Argument Structure and Message Acceptance,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2), 168–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2003), “The Effects of Structural and Grammatical Variables on Persuasion: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective,” Psychology and Marketing, 20 (4), 349–75.
   Google Scholar
• ———, and J.R. Sparks (2005), “Language Power and Persuasion,” Psychology and Marketing, 22 (6), 507–25.
   Google Scholar
• Berney-Reddish, IllonaA., and CharlesS. Areni (2005), “Effects of Probability Markers on Advertising Claim Acceptance,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 11 (1), 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Berney-Reddish, IllonaA., and CharlesS. Areni (2006), “Sex Differences in Responses to Probability Markers in Advertising Claims,” Journal of Advertising, 35 (2), 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenship, KevinL., and TraciY. Craig (2011), “Language Use and Persuasion: Multiple Roles for Linguistics Styles,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5 (4), 194–205.
   Google Scholar
• ———, and Thomas Holtgraves (2005), “The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24 (1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradac, JamesJ., and Anthony Mulac (1984), “A Molecular View of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles: Attributional Consequences of Specific Language Features and Communicator Intentions,” Communication Monographs, 51 (4), 307–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broach, CarterV. Jr., ThomasJ. Page Jr., and R. Dale Wilson (1995), “Television Programming and Its Influence on Viewers’ Perceptions of Commercials: The Role of Program Arousal and Pleasantness,” Journal of Advertising, 24 (4), 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bušljeta Banks, Ivana, Patrick De Pelsmacker, and NathaliaA. Purnawirawan (2011), “Probability Markers in Advertising Have a Different Effect on the Purchase Intention for Hedonic and Utilitarian Low and High Involvement Services,” Proceedings of the 40th European Marketing Academy Conference , Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 294.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Guy (1992), The Discourse of Advertising, London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, DenaS., and AnthonyD. Cox (1988), “What Does Familiarity Breed? Complexity as a Moderator of Repetition Effects in Advertisement Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (1), 111–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, LeeJ. (1987), “Statistical Tests for Moderator Variables: Flaws in Analysis Recently Proposed,” Psychological Bulletin, 102 (3), 414–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mooij, Marieke, and Geert Hofstede (2010), “The Hofstede Model: Applications to Global Branding and Advertising Strategy and Research,” International Journal of Advertising, 29 (1), 85–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, WilliamB., KentB. Monroe, and Dhruv Grewal (1991), “The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (3), 307–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durik, AmandaM., AnneM. Britt, Rebecca Reynolds, and Jennifer Storey (2008), “The Effects of Hedges in Persuasive Arguments: A Nuanced Analysis of Language,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (3), 217–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, Adrian, and Tracy Ribchester (1995), “Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Concept, Its Measurement, and Applications,” Current Psychology, 14 (3), 179–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuens, Maggie, Patrick De Pelsmacker, and Tine Faseur (2011), “Emotional Advertising: Revisiting the Role of Product Category,” Journal of Business Research, 64 (4), 418–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, RichardJ., JuliaC. Pounds, MelissaJ. Maiorelle, and Maria Mermis (1993), “The Effect of Type of Claim, Gender, and Buying History on the Drawing of Pragmatic Inferences from Advertising Claims,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2 (1), 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• ———, RuthE. Sturm, MichaelL. Klassen, and JohnI. Bechtold (1986), “Language in Advertising: A Psycholinguistic Approach,” Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 9 (1–2), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, JeffreyL., MichaelJ. Stevens, Allan Bird, Mark Mendenhall, and Gary Oddou (2010), “The Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale: Towards a More Refined Measure for International Management Research,” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34 (1), 58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, Geert (2009), “Geert Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions,” The Hofstede Centre, . http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstede_belgium.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, ThomasM. (2001), Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• ———, and Benjamin Lasky (1999), “Linguistic Power and Persuasion,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18 (2), 196–205.
   Google Scholar
• House, Robert, NardaR. Quigley, and MaryF. Sully de Luque (2010), “Insights From Project GLOBE: Extending Global Advertising Research Through a Contemporary Framework,” International Journal of Advertising, 29 (1), 111–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, Julie, and Gary McClelland (2001), “Misleading Heuristics and Moderated Multiple Regression Models,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (1), 100–09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, AngelaY., and JenniferL. Aaker (2004), “Bringing the Frame Into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2), 205–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, ThomasJ., ChrisT. Allen, and JacquelineL. Twible (1988), “Attitude Toward the Ad: An Assessment of Diverse Measurement Indices Under Different Processing ‘Sets,’” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (3), 242–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matic, JenniferL. (2006), “The Degree of Uncertainty Avoidance Present in Croatian and American Undergraduate Students: A Comparative Analysis,” Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2 (4), . http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/291/192.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, Gary (1997), “Optimal Design in Psychological Research,” Psychological Methods, 2 (1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, AndrewA. (1986), “The Effect of Verbal and Visual Components of Advertisements on Brand Attitudes and Attitude Toward the Advertisement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (1), 12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, KeithB., and JohnL. Schlacter (1990), “The Impact of Services versus Goods on Consumers’ Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18 (1), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, SikHung, and JamesJ. Bradac (1993), Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, PetiaK., and RobertB. Cialdini (2005), “Fluency of Consumption Imagery and the Backfire Effects of Imagery Appeals,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 442–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, RichardE., JohnT. Cacioppo, and David Schumann (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (2), 135–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, RichardE., and DuaneT. Wegener (1998) “Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables,” in The Handbook of Social Psychology, Daniel Gilbert, SuzanT. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey, eds., New York: McGraw-Hill, 323–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, Jaideep, and GitaV. Johar (2002), “Effects of Inconsistent Attribute Information on the Predictive Value of Product Attitudes: Toward a Resolution of Opposing Perspectives,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (1), 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimp, TerenceA. (1983), “Evaluative Verbal Content and Deception in Advertising: A Review and Critical Analysis,” in Information Processing Research in Advertising, RichardJ. Harris, ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 195–216.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, RuthAnn (1991), “The Effects of Visual and Verbal Advertising Information on Consumers’ Inferences,” Journal of Advertising, 20 (4), 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, JohnR., and CharlesS. Areni (2002), “The Effects of Sales Presentation Quality and Initial Perceptions on Persuasion: A Multiple Role Perspective,” Journal of Business Research, 55 (6), 517–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, JohnR., and CharlesS. Areni (2008), “Style versus Substance: Multiple Roles of Language Power in Persuasion,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38 (1), 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, ———, and K. Chris Cox (1998), “An Investigation of the Effects of Language Style and Communication Modality on Persuasion,” Communication Monographs, 65, 108–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, MarlaRoyne (1996), “Tangibility in Services Advertising: An Investigation of Verbal versus Visual Cues,” Journal of Advertising, 25 (3), 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and Ellen Day (1995), “Retail Services Advertising: The Effects of Appeal, Medium, and Service,” Journal of Advertising, 24 (1), 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ThomasF. Stafford, and Ellen Day (2002), “A Contingency Approach: The Effects of Spokesperson Type and Service Type on Service Advertising Perceptions,” Journal of Advertising, 31 (2), 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Vestergaard, Torben, and Kim Schroder (1985), The Language of Advertising, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, KevinE., EricR. Spangenberg, and Bianca Grohmann (2003), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (3), 310–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, JohnW., and LawrenceA. Hosman (1983), “Language Style and Sex Bias in the Courtroom: The Effects of Male and Female Use of Hedges and Intensifiers on Impression Formation,” Southern Speech Communication Journal, 48, 137–52.
   Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, JudithL. (1994), “The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 23 (4), 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, ValerieA., A. Parasuraman, and LeonardL. Berry (1985), “Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 49, 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar