The Journal of Advertising and the Development of Advertising Theory: Reflections and Directions for Future Research

REFERENCES

• Carlson, Les (2015), “The Journal of Advertising: Historical, Structural, and Brand Equity Considerations,” Journal of Advertising, 44 (1), 80–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, Jason A., and Cindy P. Zapata-Phelan (2007), “Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A Five-Decade Study of the Academy of Management Journal,” Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6), 1281–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, Siva K., James A. Karrh, and Hermant Patwardhan (2006), “Audience Response to Product Placements: An Integrative Framework and Future Research Agenda,” Journal of Advertising, 35 (3), 115–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, Ronald J., Brittany R. L. Duff, and Xiaoli Nan (2012), “Coloring Outside the Lines: Suggestions for Making Advertising Theory More Meaningful,” in Advertising Theory, S. Rodgers and E. Thorson, eds., New York: Routledge, 18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, Donald C. (2007), “The Field of Management's Devotion to Theory: Too Much of a Good Thing?,” Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6), 1346–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Weiyin, Frank K. Y. Chan, James Y. L. Thong, Lewis C. Chaslow, and Gurpreet Dhillon (2014), “A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research,” Information Systems Research, 25 (1), 111–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, Hanjun, Chang-Hoan Cho, and Marilyn S. Roberts (2005), “Internet Uses and Gratifications: A Structural Equation Model of Interactive Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 34 (2), 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laczniak, Russell N. (2003), “From the Editor,” Journal of Advertising, 32 (2), 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laczniak, Russell N., and Les Carlson (2012), “A Theory of Advertising to Children,” in Advertising Theory, S. Rodgers and E. Thorson, eds., New York: Routledge, 135–148.
   Google Scholar
• Nan, Xiaoli, and Ronald Faber (2004), “Advertising Theory: Reconceptualizing the Building Blocks,” Marketing Theory, 4, 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pasadeos, Yorgo, Joseph Phelps, and Aimee Edison (2008), “Searching for Our ‘Own Theory’ in Advertising: An Update of Research Networks,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 85 (4), 785–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo, and David W. Schumann (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (2), 135–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, B. W., R. Bareiss, and R. Holte (1990), “Concept Learning and Heuristic Classification in Weak-Theory Domains,” Artificial Intelligence, 45 (1–2), 229–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, Ivan (2012), “Human Barriers to Using Theory and Research on Responses to Advertising Messages,” in Advertising Theory, S. Rodgers and E. Thorson, eds., New York: Routledge, 529–540.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Leonard N. (2014), “Green Grass, High Cotton: Reflections on the Evolution of the Journal of Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 43 (4), 410–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, Shelly, and Esther Thorson, eds. (2012), Advertising Theory, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Qian Xu, and Xue Dou (2012), “Role of Technology in Online Persuasion: A MAIN Model Perspective,” in Advertising Theory, S. Rodgers and E. Thorson, eds., New York: Routledge, 355–372.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. I., and B. M. Staw (1995), “What Theory Is Not,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (3), 371–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, Esther, and Shelly Rodgers (2012), “What Does ‘Advertising Theories’ Mean?,” in Advertising Theory, S. Rodgers and E. Thorson, eds., New York: Routledge, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, David A., Teppo Felin, and Brayden G. King (2009), “The Practice of Theory Borrowing in Organizational Studies: Current Issues and Future Directions,” Journal of Management, 35 (3), 537–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar