The Strategic Use of Contextual and Competitive Interference to Influence Brand-Attribute Associations

REFERENCES

• Anderson, John R. (1981), “Interference: The Relationship between Response Latency and Response Accuracy,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7 (5), 326–43.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1983), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22 (3), 261–95.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Raymond R., and Thomas K. Srull (1988), “Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (1), 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Allan M., and Elizabeth F. Loftus (1975), “A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing,” Psychological Review, 82 (6), 407–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, Kalpesh K., and S. Ratneshwar (2003), “Consumer Perceptions of Product Variations Positioned on Atypical Attributes,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (1), 22–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, Russell H. (1990a), “Multiple Processes by Which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The MODE Model as an Integrative Framework,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1990b), “A Practical Guide to the Use of Response Latency in Social Psychological Research,” Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 74–97.
   Google Scholar
• Foxman, Ellen R., Darrel D. Muehling, and Phil W. Berger (1990), “An Investigation of Factors Contributing to Consumer Brand Confusion,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 24 (1), 170–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F. (2013), Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, Paul M., Steven J. Sherman, and Russell H. Fazio (1983), “On the Consequences of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19 (4), 323–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, Robert D., and Christina Saenger (2014), “Associative and Dissociative Comparative Advertising Strategies in Broadening Brand Positioning,” Journal of Business Research, 67 (7), 1559–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and H. Rao Unnava (2003), “When Competitive Advertising Can Be Beneficial,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (2), 283–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapferer, Jean-noël (1995), “Brand Confusion: Empirical Study of a Legal Concept,” Psychology and Marketing, 12 (6), 551–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, Kevin L. (1987), “Memory Factors in Advertising: The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (3), 316–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1991), “Memory and Evaluation Effects in Competitive Advertising Environments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 463–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelting, Katie, and Dan H. Rice (2013), “Should We Hire David Beckham to Endorse Our Brand? Contextual Interference and Consumer Memory for Brands in a Celebrity's Endorsement Portfolio,” Psychology and Marketing, 30 (7), 602–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Anand (2000), “Interference Effects of Contextual Cues in Advertisements on Memory for Ad Content,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9 (3), 155–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, Ali Besharat, Charles D. Lindsey, and Shanker Krishnan (2014), “Contextual and Competitive Interference: Inhibition or Facilitation?,” Journal of Advertising, 43 (3), 228–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and Shanker Krishnan (2004), “Memory Interference in Advertising: A Replication and Extension,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (4), 602–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Byung-Kwan, and Wei-Na Lee (2007), “Decreasing Advertising Interference: The Impact of Comparable Differences on Consumer Memory in Competitive Advertising Environments,” Psychology and Marketing, 24 (11), 919–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Dong Hwan, and Richard W. Olshavsky (1995), “Conditions and Consequences of Spontaneous Inference Generation: A Concurrent Protocol Approach,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61 (2), 177–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and Barbara J. Phillips (2005), “Indirect Persuasion in Advertising: How Consumers Process Metaphors Presented in Pictures and Words,” Journal of Advertising, 34 (2), 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, and ——— (2008), “It's Not Your Father's Magazine Ad: Magnitude and Direction of Recent Changes in Advertising Style,” Journal of Advertising, 37 (3), 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miaoulis, George, and Nancy D'Amato (1978), “Consumer Confusion and Trademark Infringement,” Journal of Marketing, 42 (2), 48–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedungadi, Prakash (1990), “Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (3), 263–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson-Field, Karen, Erica Riebe, and Byron Sharp (2013), “More Mutter about Clutter: Extending Empirical Generalizations to Facebook,” Journal of Advertising Research, 53 (2), 186–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara J., Edward F. McQuarrie, and W. Glenn Griffin (2014a), “The Face of the Brand: How Art Directors Understand Visual Brand Identity,” Journal of Advertising, 43 (4), 318–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———, ———, and ——— (2014b), “How Visual Brand Identity Shapes Consumer Response,” Psychology and Marketing, 31 (3), 225–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Linda M., and Patrick Vargas (2007), “Writing with Pictures: Toward a Unifying Theory of Consumer Response to Images,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (3), 341–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson, Itamar (1994), “Trademark Infringement from the Buyer Perspective: Conceptual Analysis and Measurement Implications,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13 (2), 181–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujan, Mita, and James R. Bettman (1989), “The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers' Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights from Schema Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (4), 454–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horen, Femke, and Rik Pieters (2012), “When High-Similarity Copycats Lose and Moderate-Similarity Copycats Gain: The Impact of Comparative Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (1), 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warlop, L., and J.W. Alba (2004), “Sincere Flattery: Trade-Dress Imitation and Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1), 21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar