A Meta-Analysis into Multiscreening and Advertising Effectiveness: Direct Effects, Moderators, and Underlying Mechanisms

REFERENCES

• Anderson, Daniel R., Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch, Diane E. Field, Patricia A. Collins, and John G. Nathan (1986), “Television Viewing at Home: Age Trends in Visual Attention Time with TV,” Child Development, 57 (4), 1024–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell, Robert, Matthew Gorton, Johannes Sauer, Paul Bottomley, and John White (2016), “Don’t Distract Me When I’m Media Multitasking: Toward a Theory for Raising Advertising Recall and Recognition,” Journal of Advertising, 45 (2), 198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, Donald D., Herman Aguinis, Ciaran Heavey, David J. Ketchen, Brian K. Boyd, Peiran Su, Cubie L.L. Lau, and Harry Joo (2014), “Using Meta‐Analytic Structural Equation Modeling to Advance Strategic Management Research: Guidelines and an Empirical Illustration via the Strategic Leadership‐Performance Relationship,” Strategic Management Journal, 37 (3), 477–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuckels, Emma, Veroline Cauberghe, and Liselot Hudders (2017), “How Media Multitasking Reduces Advertising Irritation: The Moderating Role of the Facebook Wall,” Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 413–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bither, S.W., and Peter L. Wright (1973), “The Self-Confidence-Advertising Response Relationship: A Function of Situational Distraction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (2), 146–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, Robert F., and Paul R. D’Agostino (1992), “Stimulus Recognition and the Mere Exposure Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (4), 545–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, S.A., and James Gips (2011), “Media Multitasking Behavior: Concurrent Television and Computer Usage,” CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14 (9), 527–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, S.A., and James Gips (2017), “Media Multitasking: How Visual Cues Affect Switching Behavior,” Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 258–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capella, Michael L., Charles R. Taylor, and Cynthia Webster (2008), “The Effect of Cigarette Advertising Bans on Consumption: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Advertising, 37 (2), 7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Christopher J., and Franklin J. Boster (2013), “The Relationship between Message Recall and Persuasion: More Complex Than It Seems,” Journal of Communication, 63 (4), 661–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinchanachokchai, Sydney, Brittany R.-L. Duff, and Sela Sar (2015), “The Effect of Multitasking on Time Perception, Enjoyment, and Ad Evaluation.,” Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 185–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1997), Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life, New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Majorie, Heidi E.J.J.M. Buijtels, and W. Fred van Raaij (2005), “Separate and Joint Effects of Medium Type on Consumer Responses: A Comparison of Television, Print, and the Internet,” Journal of Business Research, 58 (3), 377–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducheneaut, Nicolas, Robert J. Moore, Lora Oehlberg, James D. Thornton, and Eric Nickell (2008), “Social TV: Designing for Distributed, Sociable Television Viewing,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24 (2), 136–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, Brittany R.L., and Sela Sar (2015), “Seeing the Big Picture: Multitasking and Perceptual Processing Influences on Ad Recognition,” Journal of Advertising, 44 (3), 173–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, Brittany R.L., and Claire M. Segijn (2019), “Advertising in a Media Multitasking Era: Considerations and Future Directions,” Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, Martin (2007), “Understanding Two-Sided Persuasion: An Empirical Assessment of Theoretical Approaches,” Psychology and Marketing, 24 (0), 615–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, Martin (2011), “How Humor in Advertising Works: A Meta-Analytic Test of Alternative Models,” Marketing Letters, 22 (2), 115–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, Martin (2017), “Meta-Analysis in Advertising Research,” Journal of Advertising, 46 (1), 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, Martin, and Farid Tarrahi (2016), “The Effectiveness of Advertising: A Meta-Meta-Analysis of Advertising Inputs and Outcomes,” Journal of Advertising, 45 (4), 519–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2018), “Mobile Advertising Is Expected to Surpass TV Ad Spending,” April 19, https://www.emarketer.com/content/mobile-advertising-is-expected-to-surpass-tv-ad-spending.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Melanie C., and Timothy C. Brock (2000), “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (5), 701–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, Louisa, and Kim McCann (2008), “An Integrated Model of Advertising Clutter in Offline and Online Media,” International Journal of Advertising, 27 (4), 569–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Robert P., Suzanne Pingree, Jacqueline Hitchon, Barry Radler, Bradley W. Gorham, LeeAnn Kahlor, Eileen Gilligan, Ronald C. Serlin, Toni Schmidt, Prathana Kannaovakun, and Gudbjorg Hildur Kolbeins (2005), “What Produces Television Attention and Attention Style?,” Human Communication Research, 31 (1), 162–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, John E., and Frank L. Schmidt (2004), Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Jonathan A., Patrick Walsh, Joe Cobbs, and Brian A. Turner (2015), “The Effects of Second Screen Use on Sponsor Brand Awareness: A Dual Coding Theory Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32 (2), 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, Se-Hoon, and Yoori Hwang (2012), “Does Multitasking Increase or Decrease Persuasion? Effects of Multitasking on Comprehension and Counterarguing,” Journal of Communication, 62 (4), 571–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, Se-Hoon, and Yoori Hwang (2016), “Media Multitasking Effects on Cognitive vs. Attitudinal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis,” Human Communication Research, 42 (4), 599–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel (1973), Attention and Effort, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kazakova, Snezhanka, Verolien Cauberghe, Liselot Hudders, and Christophe Labyt (2016), “The Impact of Media Multitasking on the Cognitive and Attitudinal Responses to Television Commercials: The Moderating Role of Type of Advertising Appeal.,” Journal of Advertising, 45 (4), 403–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, Robert J., and Chris T. Allen (1994), “Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononova, Anastasia, Elizabeth T. Quilliam, and Jef Richards (2016), “Does Multi-Screening Predict Advertising Avoidance? Direct and Indirect Effects of Media Multitasking, Advertising Skepticism, Intrusiveness, and Irritation,” in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, T. Reichert, ed., 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, Dean M., Glen T. Cameron, and Candace McKearney White (1995), “Visual Attention to Programming and Commercials: The Use of In-Home Observations,” Journal of Advertising, 24 (1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Dean M., and Keith F. Johnson (1991), “Differences in the Consumption of Traditional Broadcast and VCR Movie Rentals,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35 (2), 213–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, Annie (2000), “The Limited Capacity Model of Mediated Message Processing,” Journal of Communication, 50 (1), 46–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, Annie (2006), “Using the Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing to Design Effective Cancer Communication Messages,” Journal of Communication, 56 (Suppl. 1), S57–S80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, Mark W., and David T. Wilson (2001), Practical Meta-Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E. (2005), “Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, R.E. Mayer, ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• McCreery, Stephen P., and Dean M. Krugman (1995), “TV and the iPad: How the Tablet Is Redefining the Way We Watch,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electornic Media, 59 (4), 620–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, Emily (2008), “Toward a Theory of Entertainment Persuasion: Explaining the Persuasive Effects of Entertainment-Education Messages,” Communication Theory, 18 (3), 407–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, Emily, and Robin L. Nabi (2010), “Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion,” Human Communication Research, 36 (1), 26–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2018), “Juggling Act: Audiences Have More Media at Their Disposal and Are Using Them Simultaneously,” https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2018/juggling-act-audiences-have-more-media-at-their-disposal-and-are-using-them-simultaneously.html.
   Google Scholar
• Oviedo, Vanessa, Michelle Tornquist, Tierney Cameron, and Dan Chiappe (2015), “Effects of Media Multi-Tasking with Facebook on the Enjoyment and Encoding of TV Episodes,” Computers in Human Behavior, 51, Part A, 407–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, Stephan W., and Anthony S. Bryk (2002), Hierarchical Linear Models. Application and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, Stephan W., and Xiaofeng Liu (2000), “Statistical Power and Optimal Design for Multisite Randomized Trials,” Psychological Methods, 5 (2), 199–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, Hastie, and Bernadette Park (1986), “The Relationship between Memory and Judgment Depends on Whether the Judgment Task Is Memory-Based or On-Line,” Psychological Review, 93 (3), 258–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Robert (1979), “The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results,” Psychological Bulletin, 86 (3), 638–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvucci, Dario D., and Niels Taatgen (2008), “Threaded Cognition: An Integrated Theory of Concurrent Multitasking,” Psychological Review, 115 (1), 101–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvucci, Dario D., and Niels Taatgen (2011), The Multitasking Mind, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, Gabi, Mariska Kleemans, and Anna Van Cauwenberge (2018), “Second Screening for News: Effects of Presentation on Information Processing and Program Liking,” Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Susanne, and Martin Eisend (2015), “Advertising Repetition: A Meta-Analysis on Effective Frequency in Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 44 (4), 415–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Screenforce (2016), “TV-Reclamemarkt Komt Uit Op €482 Mio in Eerste Helft 2016,” http://screenforce.nl/tv-reclamemarkt-komt-uit-op-e-482-mio-in-eerste-helft-2016/.
   Google Scholar
• Segijn, Claire M., and Anastasia Kononova (2018), “Audience, Media, and Cultural Factors as Predictors of Multiscreen Use: A Comparative Study of the Netherlands and the United States,” International Journal of Communication, 12, 4708–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, Claire M., Hilde A.M. Voorveld, and Edith G. Smit (2016), “The Underlying Effects of Multiscreening,” Journal of Advertising, 45 (4), 391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, Claire M., Hilde A.M. Voorveld, and Edith G. Smit (2017), “How Related Multiscreening Could Positively Affect Advertising Outcomes,” Journal of Advertising, 46 (4), 455–72.
   Google Scholar
• Segijn, Claire M., Hilde A.M. Voorveld, Lisa Vandeberg, Sjoerd F. Pennekamp, and Edith G. Smit (2017), “Insight into Everyday Media Use with Multiple Screens,” International Journal of Advertising, 36 (5), 779–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, Claire M., Hilde A.M. Voorveld, Lisa Vandeberg, and Edith G. Smit (2017), “The Battle of the Screens: Unraveling Attention Allocation and Memory Effects When Multiscreening,” Human Communication Research, 43 (2), 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, Claire M., Shili Xiong, and Brittany R.L. Duff (2018), “Manipulating and Measuring Media Multitasking: Implications of Previous Research and Guidelines for Future Research,” Communication Methods and Measures, published electronically December 25, doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1555797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Fuyuan, Vivia C. Sheer, and Ruobing Li (2015), “Impact of Narratives on Persuasion in Health Communication: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Advertising, 44 (2), 105–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, Michael D., and Donna Rouner (2002), “Entertainment? Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion,” Communication Theory, 12 (2), 173–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cauwenberge, Anna, Gabi Schaap, and Rob van Roy (2014), “TV No Longer Commands Our Full Attention: Effects of Second-Screen Viewing and Task Relevance on Cognitive Load and Learning from News,” Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reijmersdal, Eva A., Marieke L. Fransen, Guda van Noort, Suzanna J. Opree, Lisa Vandeberg, Sanne Reusch, Floor van Lieshout, and Sophie C. Boerman (2016), “Effects of Disclosing Sponsored Content in Blogs: How the Use of Resistance Strategies Mediates Effects on Persuasion,” American Behavioral Scientist, 60 (12), 1458–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorveld, Hilde A.M., Claire M. Segijn, Paul E. Ketelaar, and Edith G. Smit (2014), “Investigating the Prevalence and Predictors of Media Multitasking across Countries,” International Journal of Communication, 8 (1), 2755–77.
   Google Scholar
• Vorderer, Peter, Christoph Klimmt, and Ute Ritterfeld (2004), “Enjoyment: At the Heart of Media Entertainment,” Communication Theory, 14 (4), 388–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Zheng, Matthew Irwin, Cody Cooper, and Jatin Srivastava (2015), “Multidimensions of Media Multitasking and Adaptive Media Selection,” Human Communication Research, 41 (1), 102–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, Robert B. (1968), “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 (2), 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuwerink Jacks, Julia, and Kimberly A. Cameron (2003), “Strategies for Resisting Persuasion,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25 (2), 145–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar