Changes in Definitions and Operationalizations in Advertising Research—Justified or Not?

References

• Aaker, Jennifer L. 1997. “Dimensions of Brand Personality.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347–356. doi:10.1177/002224379703400304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars. 2015. “Appropriate Use of Single-Item Measures is here to Stay.” Marketing Letters 26 (3): 245–255. doi:10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and John R. Rossiter. 2007. “The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs.” Journal of Marketing Research 44 (2): 175–184. doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and John R. Rossiter. 2009. “Tailor-Made Single-Item Measures of Doubly Concrete Constructs.” International Journal of Advertising 28 (4): 607–21. doi:10.2501/S0265048709200783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and Tobias Langner. 2017. “Construct Measurement in Advertising Research.” Journal of Advertising 46 (1): 129–40. doi:10.1080/00913367.2017.1281778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and Tobias Langner. 2019. “Construct Heterogeneity and Proliferation in Advertising Research.” International Journal of Advertising 38 (8): 1286–302. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1622345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and Tobias Langner. 2020. “Four Steps toward More Valid and Comparable Self-Report Measures in Advertising Research.” International Journal of Advertising 39 (5): 738–55. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1665398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and Martin Eisend. 2021. “The Dynamic Nature of Marketing Constructs.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 49 (3): 521–41. doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00756-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and Charles R. Taylor. “Reviving and Improving Brand Awareness as a Construct in Advertising Research.” Journal of Advertising. Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner II, Gordon C. 1998. “Standardization & Justification: Do Aad Scales Measure up?” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 20 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/10641734.1998.10505073
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, John T., and Richard E. Petty. 1982. “The Need for Cognition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1):116–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, John T., Richard E. Petty, and Chuan Feng Kao. 1984. “The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition.” Journal of Personality Assessment 48 (3):306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, Kevin D., and Andrew O. Herdman. 2012. “Understanding the Impact of Convergent Validity on Research Results.” Organizational Research Methods 15 (1): 17–32. doi:10.1177/1094428110392383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casimir, Gerda J., and Hilde Tobi. 2011. “Defining and Using the Concept of Household: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 35 (5):498–506. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.” Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1): 64–73. doi:10.1177/002224377901600110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerson, Kathleen, and Stacy Torres. 2015. “Changing Family Patterns.” In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by R. Scott, M. C. Buchmann and S. Kosslyn, 1–15. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Geuens, Maggie, Bert Weijters, and Kristof De Wulf. 2009. “A New Measure of Brand Personality.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 26 (2):97–107. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, Laura K. M., Stefan Mayer, and Jan R. Landwehr. 2018. “Measuring Processing Fluency: One versus Five Items.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 28 (3): 393–411. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harford, Tim. 2021. The Data Detective: Ten Easy Rules to Make Sense of Statistics. New York: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Katsikeas, Constantine S., Neil A. Morgan, Leonidas C. Leonidou, and G. Tomas M. Hult. 2016. “Assessing Performance Outcomes in Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 80 (2):1–20. doi:10.1509/jm.15.0287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, Justin F., Miaolei (Liam) Jia, Isabel L. Ding, Domenico Viganola, Warren Tierney, Anna Dreber, Magnus Johannesson, et al. 2020. “Crowdsourcing Hypothesis Tests: Making Transparent How Design Choices Shape Research Results.” Psychological Bulletin 146:451–479. doi:10.1037/bul0000220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Wei-Na, Jerome D. Williams, and Carrie La Ferle. 2004. “Diversity in Advertising: A Summary and Research Agenda.” In Diversity in Advertising: Broadening the Scope of Research Directions, editedby J. D. Williams, W.-N. Lee and C. P. Haugtvedt, 3–20. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Scott B., and Richard J. Lutz. 1989. “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context.” Journal of Marketing 53 (2): 48–65. doi:10.2307/1251413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, Naresh K., Sung S. Kim, and James Agarwal. 2004. “Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model.” Information Systems Research 15 (4): 336–355. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, Jum C., and Ira H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2016. “Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences.” Organizational Research Methods 19 (2): 159–203. doi:10.1177/1094428115624965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptok, Annette, Rupinder P. Jindal, and Werner J. Reinartz. 2018. “Selling, General, and Administrative Expense (SGA)-Based Metrics in Marketing: Conceptual and Measurement Challenges.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 46 (6):987–1011. doi:10.1007/s11747-018-0589-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, Justine, Ronald Paul Hill, Jeannie Gaines, and R. Mark Wilson. 2009. “Advertising and Consumer Privacy: Old Practices and New Challenges.” Journal of Advertising 38 (4): 51–61. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, Sara, Martin Eisend, Scott Koslow, and Micael Dahlén. 2020. “A Meta-Analysis of When and How Advertising Creativity Works.” Journal of Marketing 84 (6): 39–56. doi:10.1177/0022242920929288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, JohnR. 2011. Measurement for the Social Sciences: The C-OAR-SE Method and Why It Must Replace Psychometrics. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, John R. 2016. “How to Use C-OAR-SE to Design Optimal Standard Measures.” European Journal of Marketing 50 (11):1924–1941. doi:10.1108/EJM-10-2016-0546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenking, Bridget, and Cheryl Campanella Bracken. 2021. “Binge Watching and Serial Viewing: Comparing New Media Viewing Habits in 2015 and 2020.” Addictive Behaviors Reports 14: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100356
   Google Scholar
• Rundin, Ksenia, and Jonas Colliander. 2021. “Multifaceted Influencers: Toward a New Typology for Influencer Roles in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5): 548–564. doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1980471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, Joachim. 2021. “How Consumers Consume Social Media Influence.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5): 510–527. doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1980472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinsberg, Martin, Michael Feldman, Nicola Staub, Olmo R. van den Akker, Robbie C. M. van Aert, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen, Yang Liu, et al. 2021. “Same Data, Different Conclusions: Radical Dispersion in Empirical Results When Independent Analysts Operationalize and Test the Same Hypothesis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 165: 228–249. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra, Jeremy J., Michael R. Hyman, and Robert S. Heiser. 2012. “Ethnic Identity in Advertising: A Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Promotion Management 18 (4): 489–513. doi:10.1080/10496491.2012.715123
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. Jeff, Sandra J. Milberg, and Sandra J. Burke. 1996. “Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals' Concerns about Organizational Practices.” MIS Quarterly 20 (2): 167–96. doi:10.2307/249477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, Roy. 2010. “Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization.” Academy of Management Review 35 (3): 346–57. doi:10.5465/AMR.2010.51141319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, John O. 2001. “Guidelines for Conducting Research and Publishing in Marketing: From Conceptualization through the Review Process.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (4): 405–15. doi:10.1177/03079450094243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teas, R. Kenneth, and Kay M. Palan. 1997. “The Realms of Scientific Meaning Framework for Constructing Theoretically Meaningful Nominal Definitions of Marketing Concepts.” Journal of Marketing 61 (2):52–67. doi:10.2307/1251830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, Kjerstin S., and Shelly Rodgers. 2006. “Relationships between Blogs as EWOM and Interactivity, Perceived Interactivity, and Parasocial Interaction.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 6 (2): 5–44. doi:10.1080/15252019.2006.10722117
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Wan-Hsiu Sunny, and Linjuan Rita Men. 2013. “Motivations and Antecedents of Consumer Engagement with Brand Pages on Social Networking Sites.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 13 (2): 76–87. doi:10.1080/15252019.2013.826549
   Google Scholar
• Wacker, John G. 2004. “A Theory of Formal Conceptual Definitions: Developing Theory-Building Measurement Instruments.” Journal of Operations Management 22 (6): 629–50. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijters, Bert, Maggie Geuens, and Hans Baumgartner. 2013. “The Effect of Familiarity with the Response Category Labels on Item Response to Likert Scales.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (2): 368–81. doi:10.1086/670394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, Judith L. 1985. “Measuring the Involvement Construct.” Journal of Consumer Research 12 (3): 341–52. doi:10.1086/208520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar