Biofidelic conductive soft tissue surrogates

References

• McGrath, J.; Uitto, J. Anatomy and Organization of Human Skin. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology, 8th ed.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Rack, P. M.; Westbury, D. The Short Range Stiffness of Active Mammalian Muscle and Its Effect on Mechanical Properties. J. Physiol. 1974, 240, 331–350. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanda, A. Biofidelic Soft Composites–experimental and Computational Modeling. University of Alabama Libraries: Tuscaloosa, AL, USA, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Abas, W. W.; Barbenel, J. Uniaxial Tension Test of Human Skin in Vivo. J. Biomed. Eng. 1982, 4, 65–71. doi:10.1016/0141-5425(82)90029-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook, T.; Alexander, H.; Cohen, M. Experimental Method for Determining the 2-dimensional Mechanical Properties of Living Human Skin. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1977, 15, 381–390. doi:10.1007/BF02457990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agache, P. G.; Monneur, C.; Leveque, J. L.; De Rigal, J. Mechanical Properties and Young's Modulus of Human Skin in Vivo. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1980, 269, 221–232. doi:10.1007/BF00406415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manschot, J. F. M. The Mechanical Properties of Human Skin In Vivo. J. Biomech. 1986, 19, 511–515. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(86)90124-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manschot, J.; Brakkee, A. The Measurement and Modelling of the Mechanical Properties of Human Skin in Vivo—II. The Model. J. Biomech. 1986, 19, 517–521. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(86)90125-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C.; Marks, R. Evaluation of Biomechanical Properties of Human Skin. Clin. Dermatol. 1995, 13, 375–380. doi:10.1016/0738-081X(95)00078-T
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvistedal, Y.; Nielsen, P. Investigating stress-strain properties of in-vivo human skin using multiaxial loading experiments and finite element modeling. in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS'04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2004. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, G. In vivo characterization of viscoelastic properties of human skin using dynamic micro-indentation. in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2007. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, H. V.; Charleux, F.; Rachik, M.; Ehrlacher, A.; Ho Ba Tho, M. C. In Vivo Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of Human Skin Derived from MRI and Indentation Techniques. Computer Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 10, 401–407. doi:10.1080/10255840701550287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delalleau, A.; Josse, G.; Lagarde, J.-M.; Zahouani, H.; Bergheau, J.-M. A Nonlinear Elastic Behavior to Identify the Mechanical Parameters of Human Skin in Vivo. Skin Res. Technol. 2008, 14, 152–164. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00269.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pailler-Mattei, C.; Bec, S.; Zahouani, H. In Vivo Measurements of the Elastic Mechanical Properties of Human Skin by Indentation Tests. Med. Eng. Phy. 2008, 30, 599–606. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, B. Dynamic Mechanical Testing of Human Skin 'in vivo'. J. Biomech. 1970, 3, 557–568. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(70)90040-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, R. O.; Chrisman, D. A.; Buras, E. M. The Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Human Skin in Vivo. J. Biomech. 1983, 16, 365–372. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(83)90070-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picinbono, G.; Delingette, H.; Ayache, N. Nonlinear and anisotropic elastic soft tissue models for medical simulation. in Robotics and Automation, 2001. Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on. 2001. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kathirgamanathan, P. Curable Electrically Conductive Resins with Polyaniline Fillers. Polymer 1993, 34, 2907–2908. doi:10.1016/0032-3861(93)90141-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanda, A.; Ghoneim, H. Pumping Potential of a Two-layer Left-ventricle-like Flexible-matrix-composite Structure. Comp. Struct. 2015, 122, 570–575. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, T.; Mitchell, S.; Bibb, R.; Waters, M. Initial Validation of a Relaxed Human Soft Tissue Simulant for Sports Impact Surrogates. Procedia Eng. 2014, 72, 533–538. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.092.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, T.; Mitchell, S.; Bibb, R.; Waters, M. The Evaluation of New Multi-material Human Soft Tissue Simulants for Sports Impact Surrogates. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat. 2015, 41, 336–356. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.09.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A.; Ní Annaidh, A.; Bruyère, K. Dynamic tensile properties of human skin. in 2012 IRCOBI Conference Proceedings. 2012. International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury.
   Google Scholar
• Annaidh, A. N., Bruyère, K., Destrade, M., Gilchrist, M. D., & Otténio, M. Characterization of the Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Excised Human Skin. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat. 2012, 5, 139–148. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shergold, O. A.; Fleck, N. A.; Radford, D. The Uniaxial Stress versus Strain Response of Pig Skin and Silicone Rubber at Low and High Strain Rates. Int. J. Imp. Eng. 2006, 32, 1384–1402. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanda, A.; Unnikrishnan, V.; Roy, S.; Richter, H. E. Computational Modeling of the Female Pelvic Support Structures and Organs to Understand the Mechanism of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Review. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2015, 67, 040801. doi:10.1115/1.4030967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, P.; Natal Jorge, R.; Ferreira, A. A Comparative Study of Several Material Models for Prediction of Hyperelastic Properties: Application to Silicone‐Rubber and Soft Tissues. Strain. 2006, 42, 135–147. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00257.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanda, A.; Unnikrishnan, V. Human tissue simulants for study of traumatic brain injury (TBI). in Proceedings of the American Society for Composites: Thirty-First Technical Conference. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Chanda, A.; Callaway, C.; Clifton, C.; Unnikrishnan, V. Biofidelic Human Brain Tissue Surrogates. Mech. Adv. Mat. Struct. 2016, 1–31. doi:10.1080/15376494.2016.1143749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, L. Y. S.; Botero, M. G.; Betancur, M. Hyperelastic Material Modeling. Universidad EAFIT: Medell´ın, Colombia, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, G. A. Nonlinear Solid Mechanics. Wiley: Chichester, 2000; Vol. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Panofsky, W. K.; Phillips, M. Classical Electricity and Magnetism. Courier Corporation: Mineola, New York, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chanda, A.; Unnikrishnan, V.; Flynn, Z. Biofidelic Human Skin Simulant. US Patent Application 2015(62/189): pp 504.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, T.; Mitchell, S.; Bibb, R.; Waters, M. Development of Novel Synthetic Muscle Tissues for Sports Impact Surrogates. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat. 2015, 41, 357–374. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanda, A.; Flynn, Z.; Unnikrishnan, V. Biomechanical Characterization of Normal and Prolapsed Vaginal Tissue Surrogates. J. Mech. Med. Biol. 2018, 18, 1750100. doi:10.1142/S0219519417501007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar