References
- Arnheim , R. 1951 . Perceptual and aesthetic aspects of the movement response . Journal of Personality , 79 : 265 – 281 .
- Bijou , S. W. and Kenny , D. T. 1951 . The ambiguity values of the TAT cards . Journal of Consulting Psychology , 15 : 203 – 209 .
- Derogatis , L. R. 1965 . Commonality in perception among cultures as a function of degree of stimulus ambiguity: A cross-cultural study with the Holtzman Inkblots , Washington, D. C. : Catholic University . Unpublished doctoral dissertation
- Gorham , D. R. 1967 . Validity and reliability studies of a computer based scoring system for inkblot responses . Jouranl of Consulting Psychology , 31 : 65 – 70 .
- Luchins , A. S. 1950 . The stimulus field in social psychology . Psychological Review , 57 : 27 – 30 .
- Murstein , B. I. 1958 . The relationship of stimulus ambiguity on the TAT to the productivity of themes . Journal of Consulting Psychology , 22 : 348
- Murstein , B. I. 1960 . The measurement of ambiguity for thematic cards . Journal of Projective Techniques , 24 : 419 – 423 .
- Murstein , B. I. 1964 . A normative study of TAT ambiguity . Journal of Projective Techniques & Personality Assessment , 28 : 210 – 218 .
- Swartz , J. D. and Holtzman , W. 1963 . Group method of administration for the Holtzman Inkblot Technique . Journal of Clinical Psychology , 19 ( 4 ) : 433 – 441 .