1,433
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Rights Versus Morality: Online Debate About Decriminalization of Gay Sex in Singapore

, PhD, , JD, PhD, , PhD, , BBus & , MA

REFERENCES

  • Adam, B. A. (2002). From liberation to transgression and beyond: Gay, lesbian and queer studies at the turn of the twenty-first century. In D. Richardson & S. Seidman ( Eds.), Handbook of lesbian & gay studies (pp. 15–26). London, England: Sage.
  • Altman, D. (2002). Globalization and the international gay and lesbian movement. In D. Richardson & S. Seidman ( Eds.), Handbook of lesbian & gay studies (pp. 415–425). London, England: Sage.
  • Altman, D. (2004). Sexuality and globalization. Journal of the National Sexuality Resource Centre, 1(1), 63–68.
  • Arnold, W. (2005, April 19). Singapore, courting tourists, allows casinos. New York Times, p. 9.
  • Basu, R. (2007, September 18). Male homosexual sex to remain a crime. Straits Times. Retrieved from Factiva database.
  • Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 409–430.
  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
  • Cahill, C. M. (2005). Same-sex marriage, slippery slope rhetoric, and the politics of disgust: A critical perspective on contemporary family discourse and the incest taboo. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, 1543–1611.
  • Caramagno, T. C. (2002). Irreconcilable differences?: Intellectual stalemate in the gay rights debate. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Chan, H. C. (1993). Democracy: Evolution and implementation: An Asian perspective. In H. C. C. R. Bartley, S. Huntington, & S. Ogata ( Eds.), Democracy and capitalism: Asian and American perspectives (pp. 1–26). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Chan, P. C. W. ( Ed.). (2012). Protection of sexual minorities since Stonewall: Progress and stalemate in developed and developing countries. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Chong, A. (2008). Asian contributions on democratic dignity and responsibility: Rizal, Sukarno and Lee on guided democracy. East Asia: An International Quarterly, 25, 243–265.
  • Collins, M. (1992). Flaming: The relationship between social context cues and uninhibited verbal behavior in computer-mediated communication. Retrieved from http://emoderators.com/papers/flames.html
  • Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. (1957). Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
  • Detenber, B. H., Cenite, M., Ku, M., Ong, C., Tong, H., & Yeow, M. (2007). Singaporeans’ tolerance toward media portrayals of homosexuality and their attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(3), 367–379.
  • Detenber, B. H., Ho, S. S., Neo, R. L., Malik, S., & Cenite, M. (2013). Influence of value predispositions, interpersonal contact, and mediated exposure on public attitudes toward homosexuals in Singapore. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(3), 181–196.
  • Devlin, P. (1965). The enforcement of morals. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Dutton, W. H. (1996). Network rules of order: Regulating speech in public electronic fora. Media, Culture & Society, 18, 269–290.
  • Epstein, S. (1987). Gay politics, ethnic identity: The limits of social constructionism. Socialist Review, 93/94, 9–54.
  • Eskridge, W. N., & Spedale, D. R. (2006). Gay marriage: For better or for worse? What we’ve learned from the evidence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Fassin, E. (2001). Same sex, different politics: “Gay marriage” debates in France and the United States. Public Culture, 13, 215–232.
  • Fejes, F. (2008). Gay rights and moral panic: The origins of America’s debate on homosexuality. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Ford, P. (2009, June 11). China hushes up first gay pride week. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0611/p06s04-woap.html
  • Foy, H. (2010, November 28). Indian gay pride parade draws thousands. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/28/us-india-gays-idUSTRE6AR14V20101128
  • Frank, D. J., Camp, B. J., & Boutcher, S. A. (2010). Worldwide trends in the criminal regulation of sex, 1945 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 75, 867–893.
  • Garrett, R. K. (2006). Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 202–224.
  • Goh, D. (2008). It’s the gays’ fault: News and HIV as weapons against homosexuality in Singapore. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 32, 383–399.
  • Gross, L., & Woods, J. D. (1999). The Columbia reader on lesbians and gay men in media, society and politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Hart, H. L. A. (1963). Law, liberty and morality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Hill, K. A., & Hughes, J. E. (1997). Computer-mediated political communication: The USENET and political communities. Political Communication, 14(1), 3–27.
  • Hill, K. A., & Hughes, J. E. (1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Hull, K. E. (2001). The political limits of the rights frame: The case of same-sex marriage in Hawaii. Sociological Perspectives, 44(2), 207–232.
  • Human Rights Watch. (2008). This alien legacy: Origins of ‘sodomy’ laws in British colonialism. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/lgbt1208_web.pdf
  • Jacobs, A. M. (1993). The rhetorical construction of rights: The case of the gay rights movement, 1969–1991. Nebraska Law Review, 72, 723–759.
  • Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Romer wasn’t built in a day: The subtle transformation in judicial argument over gay rights. Wisconsin Law Review, 893–969.
  • Kahlor, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2009). If we seek, do we learn? Science Communication, 30(3), 380–414.
  • Khoo, B. T. (1999). The value(s) of a miracle: Malaysian and Singaporean elite constructions of Asia. Asian Studies Review, 23(2), 181.
  • Krohn, F. B. (2004). A generational approach to using emoticons as nonverbal communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34, 321–328.
  • Laurent, E. (2005). Sexuality and human rights: An Asian perspective. Journal of Homosexuality, 48, 163–225.
  • Lee, Y. C. L. (2008, December). “Don’t ever take a fence down until you know the reason it was put up”—Singapore communitarianism and the case for conserving 377A. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 347–394.
  • Liang, A., & Jaipragas, B. (2013, February 16). Rare mass rally in Singapore demands immigration curbs. Agence France Presse. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jDbTp2CIZuJugIzckAVyu5I68qvA?docId=CNG.447c9cb6ffadc85d1944490270e5989f.3b1
  • Li, X. (2007, October 25). Gay community signals a new focus. Straits Times. Retrieved from Factiva database.
  • Lim, L. (2004, July 17). Scoping out societies. Straits Times. Retrieved from Factiva database.
  • Lim, L., & Lin, K. (2007, October 20). “Prayer” to change a sex law. Straits Times. Retrieved from Factiva database.
  • Markwell, K. (2002). Mardi Gras tourism and the construction of Sydney as an international gay and lesbian city. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 8(1–2), 81–99.
  • Mathews, M. (2009). Christianity in Singapore: The voice of moral conscience to the state. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 24(1), 53–65.
  • McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. D. (2003). Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice. London, England: Routledge.
  • McLelland, M. (2000). Male homosexuality in modern Japan: Cultural myths and social realities. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
  • Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi. (2009). 160 Delhi Law Times 277.
  • Nelson, J. (2007, November). Romer v. Evans: A critical case for gay rights in American judicial rhetoric. Paper presented at the National Communication Association conference, Chicago, IL.
  • Nielsen Company. (2011). The digital media habits and attitudes of Southeast Asian consumers. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/reports/2011/south-east-asian-digital-consumer-habits.html
  • Norris, P. (2008). The impact of the Internet on political activism: Evidence from Europe. In C. Romm-Livermore & K. Setzekorn ( Eds.), Social networking communities and e-dating services (pp. 123–141). Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference.
  • Offord, B. (2001). Singaporean queering of the Internet: Towards a new form of cultural transmission of rights discourse. Paper presented at the AsiaPaciQueer 2: Media, Technology and Queer Cultures Conference, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld., December 3–4.
  • Offord, B., & Cantrell, L. (2001). Homosexual rights as human rights in Indonesia and Australia. Journal of Homosexuality, 40, 233–252.
  • Pakir, A., & Low, E. L. (1995). The teaching of writing in Singapore. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 6(1/2), 103–115.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27.
  • Peh, S. H. (2007, October 23). Petition to repeal gay sex law sparks heated debate. Straits Times. Retrieved from Factiva database.
  • Post, L. A., Salmon, C. T., & Raile, A. N. W. (2008). Using public will to secure political will. In S. Odugbemi & T. Jacobson ( Eds.), Communication for governance and accountability program (pp. 113–124). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • “Pretty in pink.” (2013, June 30). Straits Times. Retrieved from LexisNexis database.
  • REPEAL 377A SINGAPORE! Repeal377A. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTGrzte9ZjQ
  • Reporters without Borders. (2008). World Press Freedom Index 2008. Retrieved from http://www.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/cl_en_2008.pdf
  • Rodan, G. (2000). Singapore: Information lockdown, business as usual. In L. Williams & R. Rich ( Eds.), Losing control: Freedom of the press in Asia (pp. 169–189). Canberra: Asia Pacific Press, Australian National University.
  • Schacter, J. S. (1993). The gay civil rights debate in the states: Decoding the discourse of equivalents. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 29, 283–317.
  • Sen, A. (1997, July 14). Human rights and Asian values: What Lee Kuan Yew and Le Peng don’t understand about Asia. New Republic, 217(2–3). Retrieved from http://www.hmb.utoronto.ca/HMB303H/weekly_supp/week-02/Sen_Asian_Values.pdf
  • Sexual Offences Act 1967, c.60 (United Kingdom).
  • Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (22 October 2007) vol. 83 at cols. 2175–2242. Retrieved from http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/report.jsp?currentPubID=00075231-ZZ
  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Miller ( Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–55). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Soh, N. (2007, September 18). Big changes to penal code to reflect crime’s changing nature. Straits Times. Retrieved from Factiva database.
  • Stein, A. (2005). Make room for Daddy: Anxious masculinity and emergent homophobias in neopatriarchal politics. Gender & Society, 19, 601–620.
  • Stychin, C. F. (2004). Same-sex sexualities and the globalization of human rights discourse. McGill Law Journal, 49, 951–968.
  • Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation. (2013). Civil Appeal No.10972 OF 2013. Retrieved from http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/chejudis.asp
  • Tan, E. K. B. (2008). “Keeping God in place: The management of religion in Singapore. ” In L. A. Eng ( Ed.), Religious diversity in Singapore (pp. 55–82). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies and Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore.
  • Tan, K. P., & Lee, G. J. J. (2007). Imagining the gay community in Singapore. Critical Asian Studies, 39, 179–204.
  • Tham, Y.-C. (2014, June 21). Beware of culture wars. The Straits Times, p. D4. Retrieved from http://www.singapolitics.sg/views/beware-culture-wars
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90.
  • Wong, T. (2013, July 20). A S’pore way of fighting for gay rights: Non-confrontational tack pleases some but irks others. Straits Times (Singapore). Retrieved from the LexisNexis database.
  • Zakaria, F. (2003). The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.