The Role of Beliefs on Learning About Homosexuality in a College Course

REFERENCES

• Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93, 203–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2009). Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (1991). Beliefs about thinking. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 169–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (1995). Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking and Reasoning, 7, 221–235.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1995a). Timing of schema activation and memory: Inhibited access to inconsistent information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1995b). Timing of schema activation and memory: Inhibited access to inconsistent information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Focus on the Family. Social issues. Sexual identity. Retrieved from http://www.focusonthefamily.com/socialissues/sexual-identity.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Herek, G. (2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 905–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herek, G. (2009). Sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in the United States: A conceptual framework. In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities: The 54th Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 65–111). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, G. R., & Lee, T. T. (2006). Public attitudes toward gays and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(2), 57–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeVay, S. (2010). Gay, straight, and the reason why: The science of sexual orientation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, N. C., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future (2007). Committee on prospering in the global economy of the 21st century: An agenda for American science and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Research & Therapy of Homosexuality. NARTH mission statement. Retrieved from http://narth.com/menus/mission.html
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Research and Treatment of Homosexuality. NARTH position statements. Retrieved from http://narth.com/menus/positionstatements.html
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1999). Harnessing Science and Technology for America’s Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, T. M., Carpenter, S. L., Sedikides, C., & Li, F. (1993). Differential processing of in-group and out-group information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., Allen, R., & Hafner, J. (1983). Difficulties in everyday reasoning. In W. Maxwell (Ed.). Thinking: The frontier expands (pp. 117–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (2005). Science in America: Religious beliefs and public attitude. Retrieved from http://pewforum.org/Science-and-Bioethics/Science-in-America-Religious-Belief-and-Public-Attitudes.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Pew Global Attitudes Project. U.S. stands alone in its embrace of religion among wealthy nations. Retrieved from http://pewglobal.org/2002/12/19/among-wealthy-nations/
   Google Scholar
• Plaks, J. E., Stroessner, S. J., Dweck, C. S., & Sherman, J. W. (2001). Person theories and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotypic versus counterstereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 876–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C. (1997). Differential processing of ingroup and outgroup information: The role of relative group status in permeable boundary groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 121–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentis, K. P., & Burnstein, E. (1979). Remembering schema-consistent information: Effects of a balance schema on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2220–2221.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking and Reasoning, 13, 225–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases. Thinking and Reasoning, 14, 129–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention (2005). Homosexuality: Your questions answered. Retrieved from http://erlc.com/article/homosexuality-your-questions-answered/
   Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Associations between myside bias on an informal reasoning task and amount of post-secondary education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 851–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Always our children: A pastoral message to parents of homosexual children and suggestions for pastoral ministers. Retrieved from http://www.usccb.org/laity/always.shtml
   Google Scholar