3,069
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Backlash or a Positive Response?: Public Opinion of LGB Issues After Obergefell v. Hodges

, PhD & , PhD

References

  • American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2009). Standard definitions: Final disposition of case codes and outcomes for surveys (6th ed.). Oakbrook Terrace, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research. Retrieved from http://www.aapor.org/
  • Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008). Cohort differences in tolerance of homosexuality: Attitudinal change in Canada and the United States, 1981–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 311–330.
  • Badgett, M. V. L. (2010). When gay people get married: What happens when societies legalize same-sex marriage. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  • Baretto, M., Betsy, L C., Benjamin, G., Christopher, S. P., & Christopher, T. (2011). The Tea Party in the age of Obama. Mainstream conservatism or out-group anxiety? Political Power and Social Theory, 22, 105-137.
  • Bauerlein, V. (2016, March 24). “Bathroom battles” erupt over transgender issue. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/bathroom-battles-erupt-over-transgender-issue-1458862031
  • Bauerlein, V., & Kamp, J. (2016, April 13). Social conservatives try new tack with state-level efforts on religious freedom. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/social-conservatives-try-new-tack-with-state-level-efforts-on-religious-freedom-1460504840
  • Baunach, D. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 364–378.
  • Becker, A. B. (2014). Employment discrimination, local school boards, and LGBT civil rights: Reviewing 25 years of public opinion data. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 342–354.
  • Bernstein, M. (2015). Same-sex marriage and the future of the LGBT movement: SWS presidential address. Gender & Society, 29(3), 321-337.
  • Bernstein, M., & Taylor, V. (2013). The marrying kind? Debating same-sex marriage within the lesbian and gay movement. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Bishin, B. G., Thomas, J. H., Matthew, B. I., & Charles, A. S. (2015). Opinion backlash and public attitudes: Are political advances in gay rights counterproductive? American Journal of Political Science. 60(3), 625–648.
  • Brumbaugh, S. M., Sanchez, L. A., Nock, S. L., & Wright, J. D. (2008). Attitudes toward gay marriage in states undergoing marriage law transformation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 345–359.
  • Bureau of Sociological Research. (2013). NASIS 2012–2013 methodology report. Lincoln, NE: Bureau of Sociological Research.
  • Bureau of Sociological Research. (2015). NASIS 2014–2015 methodology report. Lincoln, NE: Bureau of Sociological Research.
  • Carroll, J. (2004, May 14). Race and education 50 years after Brown v. Board of Education. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/11686/race-education-years-after-brown-board-education.aspx
  • Christen, C. T., & Gunter, A. C. (2003). The influence of mass media and other culprits on the projection of personal opinion. Communication Research, 30, 414–431.
  • Christenson, D. P., & Glick, D. M. (2015). Issue-specific opinion change: The Supreme Court and health care reform. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 881–905.
  • Combs, M. W., & Combs, G. (2003). Revisiting Brown v. Board of Education: A cultural, historical-legal, and political perspective. Howard LJ, 47, 627.
  • Dahl, R. A. (1957). Decision-making in a democracy: The Supreme Court as a national policy-maker. Journal of Public Law, 6, 279–295.
  • Duggan, L. (2004). The twilight of equality. New York, NY: Beacon Press.
  • Edgell, P., Hull, K., Green, K., & Winchester, D. (2016). Reasoning together through telling stories how people talk about social controversies. Qualitative Sociology, 39, 1–26.
  • Engel, S. M. (2013). Frame spillover: Media framing and opinion of a multifaceted LGBT rights agenda. Law & Social Inquiry, 38, 403–441.
  • Epps, G. (2016, May 10). North Carolina’s bathroom bill is a constitutional monstrosity. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/hb2-is-a-constitutional-monstrosity/482106/
  • Erskine, H. (1973). The polls: Interracial socializing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 283–294.
  • Ettelbrick, P. (1997). Since when is marriage a path to liberation. In William N. Eskridge Jr. & Nan D. Hunter (Eds.), Sexuality, gender, and the law (pp. 817–818). Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
  • Eveland, D. A., & Schefele, W. P. (2001). Perceptions of “public opinion” and “public” opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 25–44.
  • Fetner, T. (2008). How the religious right shaped lesbian and gay activism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Fetner, T. (2016). U.S. attitudes toward lesbian and gay people are better than ever. Contexts, 15(2), 20–27.
  • Flores, A. R., & Barclay, S. (2015). Trends in public support for marriage for same-sex couples by state. Retrieved from http://www.williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu
  • Flores, A. R., & Barclay, S. (2016). Backlash, consensus, legitimacy, or polarization: The effect of same-sex marriage policy on mass attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 69, 43–56.
  • Franklin, C. H., & Kosaki, L. C. (1989). Republican schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion. American Political Science Review, 83, 751–771.
  • Galupo, M. P., & Pearl, M. L. (2007). Bisexual attitudes toward same-sex marriage. Journal of Bisexuality, 7, 287–301.
  • Gjelten, T., & Peñaloza, M. (2016 May 10). As U.S. attitudes change, some evangelicals dig in; others adapt. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2016/05/10/476651373/as-u-s-attitudes-change-some-evangelicals-dig-in-others-adapt
  • GLAAD. (2016). Accelerating acceptance. Retrieved from http://www.glaad.org/files/2016_GLAAD_Accelerating_Acceptance.pdf
  • Green, A. I. (2013). Debating same-sex marriage: Gay and lesbian spouses speak to the literature. In M. Bernstein & V. Taylor (Eds.), The marrying kind: Debating same-sex marriage within the gay and lesbian movement (pp. 375–406).
  • Haider-Markel, D. P. (2004). Media coverage of Lawrence vs. Texas: An analysis of content, tone, and frames in national and local news reporting. New York, NY: GLAAD Center for the Study of Media and Society.
  • Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2005). Attributions and the regulation of marriage: Considering the parallels between race and homosexuality. Political Science and Politics, 38, 233–239.
  • Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2008). Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights: An empirical test of attribution theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 291–310.
  • Herek, G. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264–274.
  • Herek, G., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424.
  • Hoekstra, V. J., & Segal, J. A. (1996). The shepherding of local public opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb’s Chapel. Journal of Politics, 58, 1079–1102.
  • Hoffman, L., Glynn, C. J., Huge, M. E., Sietman, R. B., & Thomson, T. (2007). The role of communication in public opinion processes: Understanding the impacts of intrapersonal, media, and social filters. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3, 287–312.
  • Hopkins, J. J., Sorensen, A., & Taylor, V. (2013). Same-sex couples, families, and marriage: Embracing and resisting heteronormativity. Sociology Compass, 7, 97–110.
  • Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hull, K. E. (2006). Same-sex marriage: The cultural politics of love and law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Irvine, J. (2005). Anti-gay politics online: A study of sexuality and stigma on national Web sites. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2, 3–21.
  • Johnson, T. R., & Martin, A. D. (1998). The public’s conditional response to Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 92, 299–309.
  • Kazyak, E. (2011). Same-sex marriage in a welcoming world: Rights consciousness of heterosexuals in liberal religious institutions. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8, 192–203.
  • Kimport, K. (2014). Queering marriage: Challenging family formation in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Klarman, M. J. (2013). From the closet to the altar: Courts, backlash, and the struggle for same-sex marriage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Kreitzer, R. J., Hamilton, A. J., & Tolbert, C. J. (2014). Does policy adoption change opinions on minority rights? The effects of legalizing same-sex marriage. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 795–808.
  • Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610.
  • Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. (2003)
  • Lax, J. A., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103, 367–386.
  • Lewis, D. C., Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Miller, P. R., Tadlock, B. L., & Taylor, J. K. (2017). Degrees of acceptance: Variation in public attitudes toward segments of the LGBT community. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 861–875. doi:10.1177/1065912917717352
  • Lewis, G. B. (2003). Black–white differences in attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 59–78.
  • Lewis, G. B. (2011). The friends and family plan: Contact with gays and support for gay rights. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 217–238.
  • Lewis, G. B., & Gossett, C. W. (2008). Changing public opinion on same-sex marriage: The case of California. Politics & Policy, 36, 4–30.
  • Lewis, G. B., & Rogers, M. A. (1999). Does the public support equal employment rights for gays and lesbians? In E. D. B. Riggle & B. L. Tadlock (Eds.), Gays and lesbians in the democratic process: Public policy, public opinion, and political representation (pp. 118–145). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Linos, K., & Twist, K. (2016). The Supreme Court, the media, and public opinion: Comparing experimental and observation methods. Journal of Legal Studies, 45, 2.
  • Liptak, A. (2017, September 16). Cake is his “art”: So can he deny one to a gay couple? New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/16/us/supreme-court-baker-same-sex-marriage.html
  • Loftus, J. (2001). America's liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review, 66(5), 762–782.
  • Luker, K. (1984). Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Marshall, T. R. (1988). Public opinion, representation, and the modern Supreme Court. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 296–316.
  • McCarthy, J. (2017). U.S. support for gay marriage edges to new high. Washington, DC: Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/210566/support-gay-marriage-edges-new-high.aspx
  • Michelson, B. F., & Harrison, M. R. (2017). Listen, we need to talk: How to change attitudes about LGBT rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, S. (2017). Onslaught of anti-LGBT bills in 2017 has activists ‘Playing Defense.’ USA Today, June 1.
  • Moore, M. R. (2010). Black and gay in L.A.: The relationships black lesbians and gay men have with their racial and religious communities. In D. Hunt & A. Ramon (Eds.), Black Los Angeles: American dreams and racial realities (pp. 188–212). New York, NY: NYU Press.
  • Moy, P., Domke, D., & Stamm, K. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 7–25.
  • Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. (2015)
  • Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T. (2006). Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 340–360.
  • Parker, C. S., & Barreto, M. A. (2013). Change they can’t believe in: The tea party and reactionary politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Persily, N., Egan, P., & Wallsten, K. (2006). Gay marriage, public opinion and the courts. Faculty Scholarship. Paper 91. Retrieved fromhttp://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/91
  • Pew Research Center. (2013a). Growing support for gay marriage: Changed minds and changing demographics. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/3-20-13%20Gay%20Marriage%20Release.pdf
  • Pew Research Center. (2013b). A survey of LGBT Americans. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/06/13/a-survey-of-lgbt-americans/
  • Pew Research Center. (2014). Changing attitudes on gay marriage. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2016/05/12/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/
  • Powell, B., Bolzendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L. C. (2010). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of marriage. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Powell, B., Quadlin, N. Y., & Pizmony-Levy, O. (2015). Public opinion, the courts, and same-sex marriage: Four lessons learned. Social Currents, 2, 3–12.
  • Richman, K. D. (2014). License to wed: What legal marriage means to same-sex couples. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. (1973)
  • Rosenberg, G. N. (1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.
  • Scott, K. M., & Saunders, K. L. (2006). Courting public opinion: Supreme Court impact on public opinion reconsidered. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Retrieved from http://www.kevinmscott.com/SSmpsa06.pdf
  • Sherkat, D. E., De Vries, K. M., & Creek, S. (2010). Race, religion, and opposition to same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 80–98.
  • Stange, M., & Kazyak, E. (2016). Examining the nuance in public opinion of pro-LGB policies in a “red state.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13, 142–157.
  • Stern, M. J. (2016, April 5). Mississippi governor signs LGBTQ segregation bill into law. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2016/04/05/mississippi_lgbtq_segregation_bill_signed_into_law_by_gov_phil_bryant.html
  • Stoddard, T. (1997). Why gay people should seek the right to marry. In William N. Eskridge Jr. & Nan D. Hunter (Eds.), Sexuality, gender, and the law (pp. 818–822). Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
  • Stone, A. (2012). Gay rights at the ballot box. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Stoutenborough, J. W., Haider-Markel, D. P., & Allen, M. D. (2006). Reassessing the impact of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion: Gay civil rights cases. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 419–433.
  • Thee-Brenan, M. (2016, May 19). Public is divided over transgender bathroom issue, poll shows. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/20/us/politics/transgender-public-bathroom-poll.html?_r=1
  • Walters, S. D. (2014). The tolerance trap: How God, genes, and good Intentions are sabotaging gay equality. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Whitehead, A. L. (2010). Sacred rites and civil rights: Religion’s effect on attitudes toward same-sex unions and the perceived cause of homosexuality. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 63–79.
  • Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2009). What underlies the false consensus effect? How personal opinion and disagreement affect perception of public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1, 25–46.
  • Woodford, M. R., Chonody, J., Scherrer, K., Silverschanz, P., & Kulick, A. (2012). The “persuadable middle” on same-sex marriage: Formative research to build support among heterosexual college students. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 1–14.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.