Hegemony and Heteronormativity: Homonormative Discourses of LGBTQ Activists About Lesbian and Gay Parenting

References

• Bernini, S. (2008). Family politics: Political rhetoric and the transformation of family life in the Italian Second Republic. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 13(3), 305–324. doi:10.1080/13545710802218494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. (1997). Celebration and suppression: The strategic uses of identity by the lesbian and gay movement. American Journal of Sociology, 103(3), 531–565. doi:10.1086/231250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. (2003). Nothing ventured, nothing gained? Conceptualizing social movement “success” in the lesbian and gay movement. Sociological Perspectives, 46(3), 353–379. doi:10.1525/sop.2003.46.3.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertone, C., & Franchi, M. (2014). Suffering as the path to acceptance: Parents of gay and lesbian young people negotiating Catholicism in Italy. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 10(1–2), 58–78. doi:10.1080/1550428X.2014.857496
   Google Scholar
• Brinamen, C. F., & Mitchell, V. (2008). Gay men becoming fathers: A model of identity expansion. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 4(4), 521–541. doi:10.1080/15504280802191772
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2002). Is kinship always already heterosexual? Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13, 14–44. doi:10.1215/10407391-13-1-14
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. (2004). After kinship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castro Varela, M., Dhawan, N., & Engel, A. (2011). Introduction. In M. Castro Varela, N. Dhawan, & A. Engel (Eds.), Hegemony and heteronormativity: Revisiting “the political” in queer politics (pp. 1–24). Surrey (UK): Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R., Avery, L. R., Dodson, C., & Goodman, K. D. (2012). Against nature: How arguments about the naturalness of marriage privilege heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 46–62. doi:10.1111/josi.2011.68.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2009). Gender in world perspective (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dall’Orto, G. (1988). La “tolleranza repressiva” dell’omosessualità [The “repressive tolerance” ho homosexuality]. In Arcigay (Ed), Omosessuali e Stato [Homosexuals and the State] (pp. 37–57). Bologna, Italy: Cassero.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (2015). Warped: Gay normality and queer anti-capitalism. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality: Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121−138). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, E. (2010). Celibate priests, continent homosexuals. What the exclusion of gay (and gay-friendly) men from priesthood reveals about the political nature of the Roman Catholic Church. Borderlands, 3(9), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fedewa, A. L., Black, W. W., & Ahn, S. (2015). Children and adolescents with same-gender parents: A meta-analytic approach in assessing outcomes. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 11(1), 1–34. doi:10.1080/1550428X.2013.869486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, vol.1: An introduction. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Frisina, A. (2010). Focus group. Una guida pratica [Focus group. Practical handbook] Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Fruggeri, L. (2005). Diverse normalità. Psicologia sociale delle relazioni familiari [Normal diversities. Social psychology of family relationships]. Roma, Italy: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Galimberti, U. (2009). I Miti del nostro tempo [Myths of our time]. Milan, Italy: Giangiacomo Feltrinelli Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Garelli, F. (2007). The church and Catholicism in contemporary Italy. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 12(1), 2–7. doi:10.1080/13545710601132672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzetta Ufficiale. (1929). Legge 27 maggio 1929, n. 810. Esecuzione del Trattato, dei quattro allegati annessi, e del Concordato, sottoscritti in Roma, tra la Santa Sede e l’Italia, l’11 febbraio 1929 [Law No. 810 of 27 May 1929. Execution of the Treaty, of the Four Annexes, and of the Concordat, signed in Rome, between the Holy See and Italy, on 11 February 1929]. Gazzetta Ufficiale n.130 del 5.06.1929. Rome, Italy: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzetta Ufficiale. (1985). Legge 25 maggio 1985, n.121. Ratifica ed esecuzione dell’accordo con protocollo addizionale che apporta modifiche al Concordato [Law No.121 of 25 March 1985. Ratification and implementation of the agreement with additional protocol bearing amendments to the Concordat]. Gazzetta Ufficiale n.85 del 10.04.1985. Rome, Italy: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzetta Ufficiale. (2004). Legge 20 maggio 2004, n.40. Norme in materia di procreazione medicalmente assistita [Law No.40 of 20 may 2004. Rules on medically assisted procreation]. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 45 del 24.02.2004. Rome, Italy: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzetta Ufficiale. (2016). Legge 20 maggio 2016, n.76. Regolamentazione delle unioni civili tra persone delle stesso sesso e disciplina delle convivenze [Law No.76 of 20 May 2016. Regulation of civil unions between persons of the same sex and cohabiting couples]. Gazzetta Ufficiale n.118 del 21.5.2016. Rome, Italy: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsborg, P. (2013). Famiglia Novecento. Vita familiare, rivoluzione e dittature. 1900-195 [Family 1900. In Family life, revolution and dictatorships]. Turin, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Lesbian and gay parents and their children: Research on the family life cycle. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1975a). Quaderno 1 (XVI), 1929-1930 [Notebook 1]. In V. Gerratana (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci, Quaderni del Carcere. Vol.1 [Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 1] (pp. 3–139). Roma, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1975b). Quaderno 6 (VIII), 1930-1932 [Notebook 6]. In V. Gerratana (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci, Quaderni del Carcere. Vol.2 (pp. 683–847). [Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 2]. Roma, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1975c). Quaderno 9 (VIII), 1932 [Notebook 9]. In V. Gerratana (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci, Quaderni del Carcere. Vol.2 (pp. 1095–1203). [Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 2]. Roma, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1975d). Quaderno 4 (XIII), 1930-1932 [Notebook 4]. In V. Gerratana (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci, Quaderni del Carcere. Vol.1 (pp. 417–536). [Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 1]. Roma, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1975e). Quaderno 12 (XXIX), 1932 [Notebook 12]. In V. Gerratana (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci, Quaderni del Carcere. Vol.3 (pp. 1511–1551). [Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 3], [Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 3]. Roma, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1975f). Quaderno 25 (XXIII), 1934 [Notebook 25]. In V. Gerratana (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci, Quaderni del Carcere. Vol.3 (pp. 2277–2294). [Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 3]. Roma, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1975g). Quaderno 11 (XVIII), 1932-1933 [Notebook 11]. In V. Gerratana (Ed.), Antonio Gramsci, Quaderni del Carcere. Vol.2 (pp. 1363–1509). [Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks, Vol. 2]. Roma, Italy: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1986). Gramsci’s relevance for the study of race and ethnicity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 5–27. doi:10.1177/019685998601000202
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1988). The toad in the garden: Thatcherism among the theorists. In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 35–57). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, D. M. (1995). Saint Foucault. Toward a gay hagiography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, C. P. (1995). Gender, genetics, and generation: Reformulating biology in lesbian kinship. Cultural Anthropology, 1, 41–63. doi:10.1525/can.1995.10.1.02a00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heitlinger, A. (1991). Pronatalism and women’s equality policies. European Journal of Population, 7, 343–375. doi:10.1007/BF01796873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, L. S. (1916). Social devices for impelling women to bear and rear children. American Journal of Sociology, 22(1), 19–29. doi:10.1086/212572
   Google Scholar
• ISTAT. (2012). Anno 2011. La Popolazione Omosessuale nella Società Italiana [2011. Omosexuals in Italian Society. Rome, Italy: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C. (2005). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52(4), 477–498. doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics, 2nd ed. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lasio, D., & Serri, F. (2017). The Italian public debate on same-sex civil unions and lesbian and gay parenting. Sexualities, 11, 2017. ( Prepublished December)
   Google Scholar
• Letherby, G. (2002). Childless and bereft? Stereotypes and realities in relation to “voluntary” and “involuntary” childlessness and womanhood. Sociological Inquiry, 72(1), 7–20. doi:10.1111/1475-682X.00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N., & Lotz, M. (2005). Reproductive cloning and a (kind of) genetic fallacy. Bioethics, 19(3), 232–250. doi:10.1111/biot.2005.19.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, G. (2011). From the “heterosexual matrix” to a “heteronormative hegemony”: Initiating a dialogue between Judith Butler and Antonio Gramsci about queer theory and politics. In M. Castro Varela, N. Dhawan, & A. Engel (Eds.), Hegemony and heteronormativity: Revisiting “the political” in Queer Politics (pp. 43–61). Surrey (UK): Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mallon, G. P. (2004). Gay men choosing parenthood. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, V. (1936). Trattato di diritto penale italiano [Italian penal code]. Turin, Italy: Utet.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, S. (2015). Productive paradoxes of the assisted reproductive technologies in the context of the new kinship studies. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 461–479. doi:10.1177/0192513X14563799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezey, N. J. (2013). How lesbians and gay men decide to become parents or remain child-free. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parent families. Innovations in research and implications for practice (pp. 59–70). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miall, C. E. (1986). The stigma of involuntary childlessness. Social Problems, 33(4), 268–282. doi:10.2307/800719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1979). Hegemony and ideology in Gramsci. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory (pp. 168–204). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J. M., Costa, C. G., & Nogueira, C. (2013). The workings of homonormativity: Discourses of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people on discrimination and public display of affections in Portugal. Journal of Homosexuality, 60, 1475–1493. doi:10.1080/00918369.2012.724632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overall, C. (2014). What is the value of procreation? In F. Baylis & C. McLeod (Eds.), Family-making. Contemporary ethical challenges (pp. 89–108). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, K. (2002). Stigma management among the voluntarily childless. Sociological Perspectives, 45(1), 21–45. doi:10.1525/sop.2002.45.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolin, L. L., & Perrotta, M. (2012). On the fringes of parenthood: Othering and otherness in Italian assisted kinship. About Gender, 1(2), 100–131.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, E., & Senderowitz, J. (1974). Pronatalism: The myth of mom and apple pie. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. (2000). Rethinking Sexuality. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Romans, P. (1992). Daring to pretend? Motherhood and lesbianism. In K. Plummer (Ed.), Modern homosexualities: Fragments of lesbian and gay experience (pp. 98–107). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roseneil, S., Crowhurst, I., Hellesund, T., Santos, C., & Stoilova, M. (2013). Changing landscapes of heteronormativity: The regulation and normalization of same-sex sexualities in Europe. Social Politics, 20(2), 165–199. doi:10.1093/sp/jxt006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, D. (2009). Heteronormativity and homonormativity as practical and moral resources: The case of lesbian and gay elders. Gender & Society, 23, 617–638. doi:10.1177/0891243209341357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan-Flood, R. (2005). Contested heteronormativities: Discourses of fatherhood among lesbian parents in Sweden and Ireland. Sexualities, 8(2), 189–204. doi:10.1177/1363460705050854
   Google Scholar
• Santos, C. (2013). Social movements and sexual citizenship in Southern Europe. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. (1984). A critique of the study of kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. (2002). Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. New York, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Severino, E. (1998). Il Destino della Tecnica. In [Destiny of technique]. Milan, Italy: BUR - Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2010). Gramsci at the margins: Subjectivity and subalternity in a theory of hegemony. International Gramsci Journal, 2, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history, homonormativity, and disciplinarity. Radical History Review, 100, 145–157. doi:10.1215/01636545-2007-026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasker, F., & Patterson, C. J. (2007). Research on Gay and Lesbian Parenting. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 3(2–3), 9–34. doi:10.1300/J461v03n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Trappolin, L. (2004). Identità in azione. Mobilitazione omosessuale e sfera pubblica [Identities in action. Homosexual mobilization and public sphere]. Roma, Italy: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (1993). Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. (2007). The World we have won: The remaking of erotic and intimate life. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, C. (2005). Family resemblances: Adoption, personal identity, and genetic essentialism. In S. Haslanger & C. Witt (Eds.), Adoption matters: Philosophical and feminist essays (pp. 135–145). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar