Advocacy Beyond Identity: A Dutch Gay/Lesbian Organization’s Embrace of a Public Policy Strategy

References

• Ayoub, P. M. (2016). When states come out: Europe’s sexual minorities and the politics of visibility. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. (2002). Identities and politics: Toward a historical understanding of the lesbian and gay movement. Social Science History, 26(3), 531–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. (2003). Nothing ventured, nothing gained? Conceptualizing social movement “Success” in the lesbian and gay movement. Sociological Perspectives, 46(3), 353–379. doi:10.1525/sop.2003.46.3.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branderhorst, H., Bussink, B., de Feyter, P., Sikkel, R. J., Swiebel, J., & Tielman, R. (1969). Separation from a maternal bond. New Lila’s challenge to the COC [Afscheid van een moederbinding. Uitdaging van nieuw lila aan het COC]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Nieuw Lila.
   Google Scholar
• Brico, R. (1979, January 20). Interview with Joannes Gijsen. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dagblad Rijn en Gouwe. (1982, June 28). Attack on gays [Aanval op homo’s]. Dagblad Rijn en Gouwe.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. J. (2015). Cultural corporatism and the COC. Gay and lesbian social movement advocacy in the Netherlands and dutch political culture, 1986-1994. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 18(2), 153–172. doi:10.5117/TVGN2015.2.DAVI
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. J. (2018). Strategic tradeoffs: Movement-government interactions and dutch gay and lesbian policy, 1986-1994. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 23(2), 203–218. doi:10.17813/1086-671X-23-2-203
   Google Scholar
• De Stad Amersfoort. (1982, June 16). Pink week in Amersfoort from June 19-26 [Roze Week in Amersfoort van 19 t/m 26 juni]. De Stad Amersfoort.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbeling, M., & Koenders, P. (1984). The tip of the iceberg [Het topje van de ijsberg]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Interfacultaire Werkgroep Homostudies.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J., & Giugni, M. G. (1995). Social movement types and policy domains. In H. Kriesi, R. Koopmans, J. W. Duyvendak, & M. G. Giugni (Eds.), New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis (pp. 82–110). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W. (1995). Gay subcultures between movement and market. In H. Kriesi, R. Koopmans, J. W. Duyvendak, & M. G. Giugni (Eds.), New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis (pp. 165–180). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). Breaking down the state. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duyves, M. (1985). Gay and lesbian studies comes of age. Dutch sociologists discuss homosexuality from 1965-1985 [Bij de meerderjarigheid van homostudies: Nederlandse sociologen over homoseksualiteit 1965-1985]. Sociologische Gids, 32(5–6), 332–351.
   Google Scholar
• Fobear, K. (2012). Beyond a lesbian space? An investigation on the intergenerational discourse surrounding lesbian public social places in Amsterdam. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(5), 721–747. doi:10.1080/00918369.2012.673942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekma, G. (2004). Homosexuality in the Netherlands from 1730 to the modern age [Homoseksualiteit in Nederland van 1730 tot de Moderne Tijd]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: J. M. Meulenhoff bv.
   Google Scholar
• Hekma, G., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2011). The Netherlands: Depoliticization of homosexuality and homosexualization of politics. In M. Tremblay, D. Paternotte, & C. Johnson (Eds.), The Lesbian and Gay movement and the state. Comparative insights into a transformed relationship (pp. 103–117). Surrey, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hekma, G., & van der Meer, T. (Eds.). (2011). “Save me from the insanity of the law’: Homosexuality and criminal law in the Netherlands [‘Bewaar me voor de waanzin van het recht’: Homoseksualiteit en strafrecht in Nederland]. Diemen, Netherlands: AMB.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social- movement choices. Mobilization: An International Journal, 9(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2008). Getting your way: Strategic dilemmas in the real world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2015). Introduction. Playing the game. In J. M. Jasper & J. W. Duyvendak (Eds.), Players and arenas: The interactive dynamics of protest (pp. 9–32). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kollman, K. (2017). Pioneering marriage for same-sex couples in the Netherlands. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(1), 100–118. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1147057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, M. (1989). Purple September. A documentary [Paarse September. Een documentaire]. In G. Hekma (Ed.), Two of a kind. A history of homosexual men and lesbian women in the Netherlands [Goed verkeerd. Een geschiedenis van homoseksuele mannen en lesbische vrouwen in Nederland] (pp. 183–1198). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Meulenhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Whittier, N. (1994). Social movement spillover. Social Problems, 41(2), 277–298. doi:10.2307/3096934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of CRM. (1978, March 1). Letter to the COC. IISG. Archive JanHerman Veenker, ARCH03134.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of CRM. (1981, May). Advice on legally combating discrimination based on homosexuality [Advies over de wettelijke bestrijding van discriminatie]. Rijswijk, Netherlands: Author.
   Google Scholar
• NVIH COC. (1977a). Memo and discussion document on political standpoints [Diskussienota politieke standpunten politieke diskussienota standpunten 1977]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IHLIA (disku/pol).
   Google Scholar
• NVIH COC. (1977b). Fall Conference 1977 in Delft. Attachment 1: Tekst of speech by Truus van Bueren on legislation against sex discrimination [Najaarskongres 1977 te Delft, Bijlage 1: Tekst van toespraak Truus van Bueren tot het Najaarskongres: Advies anti-sekse diskriminatiewetgeving]. IISG (Archive COC Chapter Utrecht ARCH03358).
   Google Scholar
• NVIH COC. (1981). Conference 1981, National Board’s Annual Report [Kongres 1981, Jaarbericht LB]. IISG (Archive COC Chapter Utrecht ARCH03358).
   Google Scholar
• NVIH COC. (1982a, January 30). COC commentary on the preliminary draft law on equal treatment [COC-commentaar op het voorontwerp Wet gelijke behandeling]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IHLIA (coc/com) g.
   Google Scholar
• NVIH COC. (1982b, June 28). Letter to Prime Minister Van Agt. National Archive (Archive SZW/Emancipatiebeleid 2.15.53).
   Google Scholar
• NVIH COC. (1983a). Policy brief homosexuality in Government policy [Nota Homoseksualiteit in het Overheidsbeleid]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Author.
   Google Scholar
• NVIH COC. (1983b, November 26 and 27). 1983 COC conference: Memo homosexuality and government policy [COC Congres: Nota Homoseksualiteit in het Overheidsbeleid]. IISG (Archive COC Chapter Utrecht ARCH03358).
   Google Scholar
• Outshoorn, J. (1994). Between movement and government: ‘Femocrats’ in the Netherlands. In H. Kriesi (Ed.), Yearbook of Swiss political science (pp. 141–165). Bern, Switzerland: Paul Haupt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Outshoorn, J. (1995). Administrative accommodation in the Netherlands: The department for the coordination of equality policy. In D. M. Stetson & A. Mazur (Eds.), Comparative state feminism (pp. 168–185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Parlement & Politiek. Chapter 1 dutch constitution [Hoofdstuk 1 Grondwet]. Retrieved from http://www.parlement.com/id/vhnnmt7jesyv/hoofdstuk_1_grondwet_volledige_tekst
   Google Scholar
• Paternotte, D., Tremblay, M., & Johnson, C. (2011). Introduction. In M. Tremblay, D. Paternotte, & C. Johnson (Eds.), The Lesbian and Gay movement and the state. Comparative insights into a transformed relationship (pp. 1–12). Surrey, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pettinicchio, D. (2012). Institutional activism: Reconsidering the insider/outsider dichotomy. Sociology Compass, 6(6), 499–510. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00465.x
   Google Scholar
• Ribberink, A. (1998). Leading women and cause minders. A history of the Action Group Man Woman Society 1968-1973 [Leidsvrouwen en zaakwaarneemsters. Een geschiedenis van de Aktiegroep Man Vrouw Maatschappij (MVM) 1968-1973] (Doctoral dissertation VU University). Hilversum, Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. 352.
   Google Scholar
• Rotterdams Nieuwsblad. (1979, April 17). Gijsen the big absentee during COC demonstration [Gijsen grote afwezige bij COC-demonstratie]. Rotterdams Nieuwsblad.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, S. (1982). A critique of the social emancipation of homosexuality [Een kritiek op de sociale emancipatie van homoseksualiteit]. Groniek, 77, 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Schuyf, J. (2000). Netherlands. In B. Zimmerman (Ed.), Lesbian histories and cultures: An encyclopedia (pp. 541–544). New York, NY: Garland Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schuyf, J. (2008). Act naturally – That’s crazy enough. In I. Dubbel & A. Hielkema (Eds.), Urgency required (pp. 22–30). The Hague, Netherlands: Humanist Institute for Cooperation with Developing Countries (Hivos).
   Google Scholar
• Shield, A. (2017). Immigrants in the sexual revolution: Perceptions and participation in Northwest Europe. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Swiebel, J. (2011, June 9-10). From tolerance to “just being gay”. Homosexuality as theme in Dutch politics [Van gedogen naar “gewoon homo zijn”; homoseksualiteit als thema in de Nederlandse politiek]. Lecture: Politicologenetmaal Ned. Kring voor de Wetenschap der Politiek/Workshop Diversiteit in de Politiek, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Tamboer, K. (Ed.). (1972). Justice dossier: Black book on the position of the Dutch government regarding homosexuality and the COC [Justitiedossier: Zwartboek over de houding van de Nederlandse overheid tegenover homoseksualiteit en het COC]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Stichting Dialoog.
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (1969-1970a). Repeal of article 248bis from the Penal Code [Intrekking van artikel 248bis van het Wetboek van Strafrecht]. 10347, nr. 6. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=sgd%3Ampeg21%3A19691970%3A0003718
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (1969-1970b). Repeal of article 248bis from the Penal Code [Intrekking van artikel 248bis van het Wetboek van Strafrecht]. 10347, nr. 4. Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=sgd%3Ampeg21%3A19691970%3A0003716
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (1973-1974). Memorandum regarding policy on constitutional reform [Nota inzake het grondwetsherzieningsbeleid]. 12944, nr. 1. Retrieved August 12, 2016, from http://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=sgd%3Ampeg21%3A19731974%3A0005690
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (1975-1976). Attachments to the explanatory memorandum [Bijlagen bij de Memorie van Toelichting]. 13872, nr. 4. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from http://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=sgd%3Ampeg21%3A19751976%3A0005337
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (1985-1986). Government policy and homosexuality 19504 nr. 1 [Overheidsbeleid en homoseksualiteit 19504 nr. 1]. Retrieved January 20, 2014, from http://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=sgd%3Ampeg21%3A19851986%3A0007900
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (2014-2015). Consultation and contradiction: Selection of the strategic partners in alphabetical order [Samenspraak en Tegenspraak: Selectie van de Strategische Partnerschappen op alfabetische volgorde]. 33625, blg-474161. Retrieved February 5, 2017, from https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/blg-474161
   Google Scholar
• Van der, A. M., Dijkstra, T., Grotenhuis, S., Meyer, J., & Swiebel, J. (1982, May). An analysis of the “Woman Question” [Een analyse van het “Vrouwenvraagstuk”]. The Hague, Netherlands: Management of Coordinated Emancipation Policy [Directie Coördinatie Emancipatiebeleid].
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, T. (2007). Jonkheer mr. Jacob Anton Schorer (1866-1957): Een biografie van homoseksualiteit. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Schorer Boeken.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Schrier, M. (2011, September 26). Dutch army lead gay acceptance [Nederlands leger voorop in accepteren homo’s]. Historisch Nieuwsblad. Retrieved May 2, 2016, from http://www.historischnieuwsblad.nl/nl/nieuws/17110/nederlands-leger-voorop-in-accepteren-homo-s.html
   Google Scholar
• Van Gijzel, J. (1979, April 17). Exemplary protest of homophiles in Roermond [Voorbeeldig protest homofielen in Roermond]. Het Vrije Volk.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schijndel, B. (1982). Gay white paper [Homonota]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: PSP Gemeenteraadsfraktie. IHLIA (schijn/hom) g.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhala, L. (2009). Anti-discrimination policy actors and their use of litigation strategies: The influence of identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 738–754. doi:10.1080/13501760902983473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waaldijk, K. (1983). Law and homosexual liberty. A legal strategy for the gay and lesbian movement [Het recht en de homoseksuele vrijheid. Een juridische Strategie voor de homobeweging]. In M. Duyves (Ed.), Homojaarboek 2 (pp. 227–240). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Van Gennep.
   Google Scholar
• Warmerdam, H., & Koenders, P. (1987). Culture and relaxation: The COC 1946-1966 [Cultuur en ontspanning: Het COC 1946-1966]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Interfacultaire Werkgroep Homostudies.
   Google Scholar
• White paper. (n.d.). In glossary of the National archives of the UK. Retrieved from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/citizenship/glossary.htm
   Google Scholar