Don’t Be Too Political: Depoliticization, Sexual Orientation, and Undergraduate STEM Major Persistence

References

• Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Atherton, T. J., Barthelemy, R. S., Deconinck, W., Falk, M. L., Garmon, S., Long, E., … Reeves, K. (2016). LGBT climate in physics: Building an inclusive community. American Physical Society. Retrieved from https://www.aps.org/programs/lgbt/upload/LGBTClimateinPhysicsReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barthelemy, R. S. (2020). LGBT + physicists qualitative experiences of exclusionary behavior and harassment. European Journal of Physics, 41(6), 065703. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/abb56a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewe, E., Kramer, L., & Sawtelle, V. (2012). Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8( 010101). doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. D., Clarke, B., Gortmaker, V., & Robinson-Keilig, R. (2004). Assessing the campus climate for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) students using a multiple perspectives approach. Journal of College Student Development, 45(1), 8–26. doi:10.1353/csd.2004.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, E. A., & Sherick, H. M. (2015). Depoliticization and the structure of engineering education. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham & B. Newberry (Eds.), International perspectives on engineering education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Cech, E. A., & Rothwell, W. R. (2019). LGBT workplace inequality in the federal workforce: Intersectional processes, organizational contexts, and turnover considerations. ILR Review, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0019793919843508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/19378629.2010.545065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, E. A., Waidzunas, T. J., & Farrell, S. (2016, June). Engineering deans’ support for LGBTQ inclusion. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555–580. doi:10.1002/tea.21146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christe, B. (2013). The importance of faculty-student connections in STEM disciplines: A literature review. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 14(3), 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. M., Brownell, S., & Gormally, C. (2019). Coming out to the class: Identifying factors that influence college biology instructor decisions about revealing their LGBQ identities in class. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 22(3), 261–282. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2019026085
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Coming out in class: Challenges and benefits of active learning in a biology classroom for LGBTQIA students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar37. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotten, S. R., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student–faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51(4), 487–519. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-1705-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, B. E., & Orehovec, E. (2007). Faculty-student interaction outside the classroom: A typology from a residential college. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 343–362. doi:10.1353/rhe.2007.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruce, T. M. (2009). A note on the calculation and interpretation of the delta-p statistic for categorical independent variables. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 608–622. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9131-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg, M. E., Hurtado, S., & Smith, G. C. (2007). Developing attitudes of acceptance toward lesbian, gay, and bisexual peers: Enlightenment, contact, and the college experience. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 4(3), 49–77. doi:10.1300/J367v04n03_05
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, S., Guerra, R. C. C., Chavela Guerra, R., Tsanov, R., Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2017). ASEE safe zone workshops and virtual community of practice to promote LGBTQ equality in engineering. Paper presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people’: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331–356. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. C., & Russell, S. T. (2001). Incorporating issues of sexual orientation in the classroom: Challenges and solutions. Family Relations, 50(1), 34–40. doi:10.2307/585772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frehill, L. M. (2004). The gendered construction of the engineering profession in the United States, 1893–1920. Men and Masculinities, 6(4), 383–403. doi:10.1177/1097184x03260963
   Google Scholar
• Furrow, H. (2012). LGBT students in the college composition classroom. Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 6(3), 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, S. B., & Davis, D. S. (2010). Heterosexual allies: A descriptive profile. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(4), 478–494. doi:10.1080/10665684.2010.505464
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A.-B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. doi:10.1126/science.1240487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. doi:10.1126/science.1204820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M. (2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 905–925. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00544.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. E. (2016). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. E. (2017). “Managing by not managing”: How gay engineering students manage sexual orientation. Journal of College Student Development, 58(3), 385–401. doi:10.1353/csd.2017.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. E. (2018). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science Advances, 4(3). doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao6373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. E., & Hurtado, S. (2018). Thinking about sexual orientation: College experiences that predict identity salience. Journal of College Student Development, 59(3), 309–326. doi:10.1353/csd.2018.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., & Arellano, L. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 41–122). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Figueroa, T., & Hughes, B. E. (2014). Reversing underrepresentation: The impact of undergraduate research programs on enrollment in STEM graduate programs. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. T., Barlow, A. E., & Villarejo, M. (2010). Importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 82–115. doi:10.1080/00221546.2010.11778971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgo, C. A., Linley, J. L., Renn, K. A., & Woodford, M. R. (2019). High-impact for whom? The influence of environment and identity on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer college students’ participation in high-impact practices. Journal of College Student Development, 60(4), 421–436. doi:10.1353/csd.2019.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, R. (2009). Minority retention rates in science are sore spot for most universities. Science, 324(5933), 1386–1387. doi:10.1126/science.324_1386a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuvalanka, K. A., Goldberg, A. E., & Oswald, R. F. (2013). Incorporating LGBTQ issues into family courses: Instructor challenges and strategies relative to perceived teaching climate. Family Relations, 62(5), 699–713. doi:10.1111/fare.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linley, J. L., Renn, K. A., & Woodford, M. R. (2018). Examining the ecological systems of LGBTQ STEM majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 24(1), 1–16. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017018836
   Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. doi:10.1002/sce.20441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattheis, A., De Arellano, D. C.-R., & Yoder, J. B. (2019). A model of queer STEM identity in the workplace. Journal of Homosexuality, 1–25. doi:10.1080/00918369.2019.1610632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A. D., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2016). How college affects students, volume 3: 21st Century evidence that higher education works. Newark, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. (1997). It’s safer this way: The subtle and not-so-subtle exclusion of men in child care. In N. V. Benokraitis (Ed.), Subtle sexism: Current practices and prospects for change (pp. 136–149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, E., and Medicine. (2017). Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching Category 5. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209. doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• oSTEM. (n.d.). About oSTEM. oSTEM. Retrieved from http://www.ostem.org/
   Google Scholar
• Patridge, E. V., Barthelemy, R. S., & Rankin, S. R. (2014). Factors impacting the academic climate for LGBQ STEM faculty. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(1), 75–98. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007429
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2019). Majority of public favors same-sex marriage, but divisions persist. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.people-press.org/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2020). The global divide on homosexuality persists. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org
   Google Scholar
• Poynter, K. J., & Tubbs, N. J. (2008). Safe zones. Journal of LGBT Youth, 5(1), 121–132. doi:10.1300/J524v05n01_10
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. White House. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, J. J., & Zimmerman, H. (2016). Research brief: 2016 diverse learning environments. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, K. A. (2007). LGBT student leaders and queer activists: Identities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer identified college student leaders and activists. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 311–330. doi:10.1353/csd.2007.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revilla, A. T. (2010). Raza Womyn—Making it safe to be queer: Student organizations as retention tools in higher education. Black Women, Gender & Families, 4, 1. doi:10.1353/bwg.0.0017
   Google Scholar
• Riley, D. M. (2013, June). The island of other: Making space for embodiment of difference in engineering. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, T., Simonds, C., & Hunt, S. (2002). Coming out in the classroom … an occupational hazard?: The influence of sexual orientation on teacher credibility and perceived student learning. Communication Education, 51(3), 311–324. doi:10.1080/03634520216516
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151. doi:10.3102/0013189X10363170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone, D., & Carpenter, C. S. (2020). Turing’s children: Representation of sexual minorities in STEM. Plos One, 15(11), e0241596. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkness, J., DeAngelo, L., & Pryor, J. H. (2010). CIRP construct technical report. Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Strayhorn, T. L., Blakewood, A. M., & DeVita, J. M. (2008). Factors affecting the college choice of African American gay male undergraduates: Implications for retention. National Association of Student Affairs Professionals Journal, 11(1), 88–108.
   Google Scholar
• Sullins, E. S., Hernandez, D., Fuller, C., & Tashiro, J. S. (1995). Predicting who will major in a science discipline: Expectancy–value theory as part of an ecological model for studying academic communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 99–119. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoman, D. B., Arizaga, J. A., Smith, J. L., Story, T. S., & Soncuya, G. (2014). The grass is greener in non-science, technology, engineering, and math classes: Examining the role of competing belonging to undergraduate women’s vulnerability to being pulled away from science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(2), 246–258. doi:10.1177/0361684313499899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toynton, R. (2007). The de-representation of science and queer science students in higher education within the queer/gay discourse. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5), 593–605. doi:10.1080/13562510701595242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenshaw, K. F., Hetrick, A., Oswald, R. F., Vostral, S. L., & Loui, M. C. (2013). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students in engineering: Climate and perceptions. Paper presented at the 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oklahoma City, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, Y., & Larson, R. (2015). STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes. Monthly Labor Review. doi:10.21916/mlr.2015.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. B., & Mattheis, A. (2016). Queer in STEM: Workplace experiences reported in a national survey of LGBTQA individuals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar