464
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Family Pictures: The Queer Relationalities of Multigenerational Queer Family

, PhD

References

  • Baxter, L. A. (2010). The dialogue of marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(4), 370–387. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00067.x
  • Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2010). Relational dialectics theory, applied. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 48–66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Bochner, A. P., Ellis, C. S., & Tillmann-Healy, L. (1997). Relationships as stories. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 307–324). New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Bochner, A. P., Ellis, C. S., & Tillmann-Healy, L. (1998). Mucking around looking for truth. In B. M. Montgomery & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships (pp. 41–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York, London: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (10th Anniv. ed.). New York, London: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (2000). Antigone’s claim: Kinship between life and death. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, London: Routledge.
  • Danielsbacka, M., Tanskanen, A. O., & Rotkirch, A. (2015). Impact of genetic relatedness and emotional closeness on intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 889–907. doi:10.1111/jomf.12206
  • Denzin, N. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Edelman, L. (2004). No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Ellis, C. S., & Bochner, A. P. (2003). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 199–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Foster, E. (2005). Desiring dialectical discourse: A feminist ponders the transition to motherhood. Women’s Studies in Communication, 28(1), 57–83. doi:10.1080/07491409.2005.10162484
  • Fruhauf, C., Orel, N., & Jenkins, D. (2009). The coming-out process of gay grandfathers: Perceptions of their adult children’s influence. Journal of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Family Studies, 5, 99–118. doi:10.1080/15504280802595402
  • Galvin, K. M. (2006). Diversity’s impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Galvin, K. M. (2014). Blood, law, and discourse: Constructing and managing family identity. In L. A. Baxter (Ed.), Remaking “family” communicatively (pp. 17–32). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Grossberg, L. (1996). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. In D. Morley & K.-H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 131–150). New York, London: Routledge.
  • Harrigan, M. M., Dieter, S., Leinwohl, J., & Marrin, L. (2014). Redefining family: An analysis of adult donor-conceived offspring’s discursive meaning-making. Iowa Journal of Communication, 46(1), 16–32. Retrieved from https://www.iowacommunication.org/s/Redefining-Family-An-analysis-of-Adult-Donor-Conceieved-Offspring.pdf
  • Harrigan, M. M., Dieter, S., Leinwohl, J., & Marrin, L. (2015). “It’s just who I am … I have brown hair. I have a mysterious father”: An exploration of donor-conceived offspring’s identity construction. Journal of Family Communication, 15(1), 75–93. doi:10.1080/15267431.2014.980823
  • Hirsch, M. (1997). Family frames: Photography, narrative, and postmemory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Holladay, S., Denton, D., Harding, D., Lee, M., Lackovich, R., & Coleman, M. (1997). Granddaughters’ accounts of the influence of parental mediation on relational closeness with maternal grandmothers. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 45(1), 23–38. doi:10.2190/NW0F-YLQ6-U8X4-1E8Y
  • Hornstein, F. (1989). No children by donor insemination. In R. Arditti, R. D. Klein, & S. Minden (Eds.), Test-tube women: What future for motherhood (pp. 373–381). London, UK: Pandora Press.
  • Madison, D. S. (2005). Critical ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Mamo, L. (2007). Queering reproduction: Achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Muñoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Muñoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York: New York University Press.
  • Orel, N. (2005). Lesbian and bisexual women as grandparents: The centrality of sexual orientation in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. In D. Kimmel, T. Rose, & S. David (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender aging: Research and clinical perspectives (pp. 248–274). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Orel, N. (2016). LGBTQ grandparenting. In A. E. Goldberg (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of LGBTQ studies (pp. 683–686). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Orel, N., & Fruhauf, C. (2014). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender grandparents. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice (pp. 177–192). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Peletz, M. G. (2001). Ambivalence in kinship since the 1940s. In S. Franklin & S. McKinnon (Eds.), Relative values: Reconfiguring Kinship studies (pp. 413–444). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Pelias, R. (2005). Performative writing as scholarship: An apology, an argument, an anecdote. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 5(4), 415–424. doi:10.1177/1532708605279694
  • Pidduck, J. (2009). Queer kinship and ambivalence: Video autoethnographies by Jean Carlomusto and Richard Fung. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 15(3), 441–468. doi:10.1215/10642684-2008-031
  • Robertson, J. F. (1975). Interaction in three generation families, parents as mediators: Toward a theoretical perspective. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 6(2), 103–110. doi:10.2190/GPFM-TFM5-9Y8Y-LHAK
  • Sachs, A. D. (2009). Father: Not stated. In S. Goldberg & C. B. Rose (Eds.), And baby makes more: Known donors, queer parents, and our unexpected families (pp. 70–83). Toronto, ON: Insomniac Press.
  • Sachs, A. D. (2018). Tying tight or splitting up: An adult’s perspective of his parents’ same-sex relationship dissolution. In A. Goldberg & A. Romero (Eds.), LGBQ divorce and relationship dissolution: Psychological and legal perspectives (pp. 245–262). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Sachs, A. D., & Schönfeldt-Aultman, S. M. (2018). A dialogue on Hip-hop, social justice and pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 26(2), 265–281. doi:10.1080/14681366.2017.1389767
  • Slagle, R. A. (2007). Ferment in LGBT studies and queer theory. Journal of Homosexuality, 52(3–4), 1–2, 309–328. doi:10.1300/J082v52n01_13
  • Stafford, L. (2004). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Suter, E. A., Baxter, L. A., Seurer, L. M., & Thomas, L. J. (2014). Discursive constructions of the meaning of “family” in online narratives of foster adoptive parents. Communication Monographs, 81(1), 59–78. doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.880791
  • Suter, E. A., & Norwood, K. M. (2017). Critical theorizing in family communication studies: (Re)reading relational dialectics theory 2.0. Communication Theory, 27(3), 290–308. doi:10.1111/comt.12117
  • Suter, E. A., Seurer, L. M., Webb, S., Grewe, B., & Koenig Kellas, J. (2015). Motherhood as contested ideological terrain: Essentialist and queer discourses of motherhood at play in female–female co-mothers’ talk. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 458–483. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1024702
  • Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Yep, G. A. (2003). The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies. In G. A. Yep, K. E. Lovaas, & E. J. P (Eds.), Queer theory and communication: From disciplining queers to queering the discipline(s) (pp. 13–60). New York: Harrington Park Press.
  • Yep, G. A. (2017). Further notes on healing from “The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, 4(2), 115–122. doi:10.14321/qed.4.2.0115
  • Yep, G. A., Lovaas, K. E., & Elia, J. P. (2014). Queer theory and communication: From disciplining queers to queering the discipline(s). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.