Free Speech or Free to Hate?: Anti-LGBTQ+ Discourses in LGBTQ+-Affirming Spaces on Gab Social

References

• Afshar, A. (2006). The anti-gay rights movement in the United States: The framing of religion. Essex Human Rights Review, 3(1), 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Aguinaldo, J. P. (2012). Qualitative analysis in gay men’s health research: Comparing thematic, critical discourse, and conversation analysis. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(6), 765–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.694753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., Saeed, M. H., Aldreabi, E., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Zannettou, S., & Stringhini, G. (2021). Understanding the effect of deplatforming on social networks. In 13th ACM Web Science Conference (Vol. 2021, pp. 187–195). https://doi.org/10.1145/3447535.3462637
   Google Scholar
• Askanius, T. (2021). On frogs, monkeys, and execution memes: Exploring the humor-hate nexus at the intersection of Neo-Nazi and alt-right movements in Sweden. Television & New Media, 22(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajak, A., Guynn, J., & Thorson, M. (2021, February 1). When Trump started his speech before the Capitol riot, talk on Parler turned to civil war. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2021/02/01/civil-war-during-trumps-pre-riot-speech-parler-talk-grew-darker/4297165001/
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2004). “Unnatural acts”: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00252.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. P. (1996, January 20). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence
   Google Scholar
• Bostdorff, D. M. (2004). The internet rhetoric of the Ku Klux Klan: A case study in web site community building run amok. Communication Studies, 55(2), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388623
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, H. (2013). Gender (2nd ed.). Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, E. (2019). With the 249th pick …: Michael Sam and imagining failure otherwise. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 43(4), 296–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723519840504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, E., Greenhalgh, S. P., & Sajjad, M. (2022). Gayservatives on Gab: LGBTQ+ communities and far right social media. Social Media + Society, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221137088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brough, M., Literat, I., & Ikin, A. (2020). “Good social media?”: Underrepresented youth perspectives on the ethical and equitable design of social media platforms. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 205630512092848. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120928488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2018). What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech? Ethnicities, 18(3), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817709846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. H., Alpaslan, A. H., Strümpher, J., & Astbury, G. (2003). Gay and lesbian youth experiences of homophobia in South African secondary education. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 1(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1300/J367v01n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Callander, D., Newman, C. E., & Holt, M. (2015). Is sexual racism really racism? Distinguishing attitudes toward sexual racism and generic racism among gay and bisexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(7), 1991–2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0487-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., & Fasoli, F. (2011). Enhancing masculinity by slandering homosexuals: The role of homophobic epithets in heterosexual gender identity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211424167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaño-Pulgarín, S. A., Suárez-Betancur, N., Vega, L. M. T., & López, H. M. H. (2021). Internet, social media and online hate speech. Systematic review. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 58, 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, W., Xie, Y., Guillem, F., & Schloerke, B. (2019). Webshot: Take screenshots of web pages (0.5.3) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=webshot
   Google Scholar
• Cho, A. (2018). Default publicness: Queer youth of color, social media, and being outed by the machine. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3183–3200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817744784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, C. (2008). Media and sexual orientation: The portrayal of gays and lesbians. In P. J. Fourie (Ed.), Media studies: Policy, management and media representation. Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Ciszek, E., & Rodriguez, N. S. (2020). Articulating transgender subjectivity: How discursive formations perpetuate regimes of power. International Journal of Communication, 14, 19. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. (2023, April 7). Twitter now disables likes, replies, and retweets if a tweet has substack links. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/6/23673043/twitter-substack-embeds-bots-tools-api
   Google Scholar
• Colburn, R., & McCarter, R. (2020, July 2). Parler, the “free speech” alternative to Twitter, keeps banning people. The A.V. Club. https://www.avclub.com/parler-the-free-speech-alternative-to-twitter-keeps-1844238633
   Google Scholar
• Collings, P. (2022, July 20). Self-proclaimed free speech platforms are censoring nude content. Here’s why you should care. Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/07/self-proclaimed-free-speech-platforms-are-censoring-nude-content-heres-why-you
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. L., Eaton, A. D., McInroy, L. B., Leung, V. W. Y., & Krishnan, S. (2021). Can social media participation enhance LGBTQ+ youth well-being? Development of the social media benefits scale. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 205630512198893. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., & Gillespie, T. (2016). What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media & Society, 18(3), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darakchi, S. (2019). “The Western feminists want to make us gay”: Nationalism, heteronormativity, and violence against women in Bulgaria in times of “anti-gender campaigns.” Sexuality & Culture, 23(4), 1208–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09611-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghan, E., & Nagappa, A. (2022). Politicization and radicalization of discourses in the alt-tech ecosystem: A case study on Gab social. Social Media + Society, 8(3), 205630512211130. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221113075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory & Society, 22(5), 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drescher, J. (2015). Out of DSM: Depathologizing homosexuality. Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs5040565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger, E. K. (2018). Transgender jobseekers navigating closeting communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(2), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917740226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrimond, K. (2017). The contemporary femme fatale: Gender, genre and American cinema (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617510
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2009). Critical theory of communication technology: Introduction to the special section. The Information Society, 25(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240802701536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejes, F. (2011). Gay rights and moral panic: The origins of America’s debate on homosexuality (First paperback ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fetner, T. (2005). Ex-Gay rhetoric and the politics of sexuality: The Christian antigay/pro-family movement’s “truth in love” ad campaign. Journal of Homosexuality, 50(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v50n01_04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuer, A. (2022, August 13). As right-wing rhetoric escalates, so do threats and violence. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/13/nyregion/right-wing-rhetoric-threats-violence.html
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. (2019a). Terrorizing gender: Transgender visibility and the surveillance practices of the U.S. security state. University of Nebraska Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpwhf5f
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. (2019b). Piss(ed): The biopolitics of the bathroom. Communication Culture & Critique, 12(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, M., & Manvell, R. (1985). Images of madness: The portrayal of insanity in the feature film. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, A. R., Stotzer, R. L., Meyer, I., Langton, L. L., & Shah, S. G. S. (2022). Hate crimes against LGBT people: National crime victimization survey, 2017-2019. PLoS One, 17(12), e0279363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge ( A. Sheridan, Trans.; 1st American ed). Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, T. (2022, July 27). Doug Mastriano faces criticism over his backing from antisemitic ally. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/27/us/politics/doug-mastriano-gab.html
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S., Vitak, J., & Shilton, K. (2021). Measuring Americans’ comfort with research uses of their social media data. Social Media + Society, 7(3), 205630512110338. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211033824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029
   Google Scholar
• GLAAD. (2022). Accelerating acceptance 2022. https://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/AcceleratingAcceptance-2022_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goforth, C. (2022, August 16). “Judas”: Gab users are furious its founder handed over data to the FBI without a subpoena. The Daily Dot. https://www.dailydot.com/debug/gab-users-revolt-andrew-torba-cooperating-fbi/
   Google Scholar
• González, J. C., & Cavazos, K. C. (2016). Serving fishy realness: Representations of gender equity on RuPaul’s drag race. Continuum, 30(6), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1231781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, L. (2003). The gay global village in cyberspace. In N. Couldry & J. Curran (Eds.), Contesting media power: Alternative media in a networked world (pp. 259–272). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 205630512092157. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822378112
   Google Scholar
• Hanckel, B., Vivienne, S., Byron, P., Robards, B., & Churchill, B. (2019). ‘That’s not necessarily for them’: LGBTIQ+ young people, social media platform affordances and identity curation. Media, Culture & Society, 41(8), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719846612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, T. O., Jameson, J. K., & Maoz, I. (2020). The normalization of hatred: Identity, affective polarization. And dehumanization on Facebook in the context of intractable political conflict. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 205630512091398. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, G. (2017). Making sense of the alt-right. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/hawl18512
   Google Scholar
• Helmore, E. (2022, July 4). US drag queens stand their ground amid intimidation by the far right. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/04/drag-queens-targeted-us-far-right
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. (2013). Love and money: Queers, class, and cultural production. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herdt, G. H. (Ed.). (2009). Moral panics, sex panics: Fear and the fight over sexual rights. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, D. (1997). The antigay agenda: Orthodox vision and the Christian right. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226327693.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society, 18(5), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290108186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton-Morrow, W., & Battles, K. (2015). Sexual identities and the media: An introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203114513
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, V. J. (2022). Irreducible damage: The affective drift of race, gender, and disability in anti-trans rhetorics. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 52(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2021.1990381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughson, J., & Free, M. (2011). Football’s “coming out”: Soccer and homophobia in England’s tabloid press. Media International Australia, 140(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1114000115
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Campaign. (2022). Digital hate: Social media’s role in amplifying dangerous lies about LGBTQ+ people. https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/CCDH-HRC-Digital-Hate-Report-2022-single-pages.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hunt-Majer, C. (n.d.). Truth can’t handle the truth. Public Citizen. Retrieved September 19, 2022, from https://www.citizen.org/article/truth-cant-handle-the-truth/
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, J. M. (2005). Anti-gay politics online: A study of sexuality and stigma on national websites. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. K. (2004). The lavender scare: The cold war persecution of gays and lesbians in the federal government. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226401966.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. J. (2016). Bisexuality, mental health, and media representation. Journal of Bisexuality, 16(3), 378–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1168335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, P., & Pramaggiore, M. (2021). Homoheroic or homophobic? Leo Varadkar, LGBTQ politics and contemporary news narratives. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 38(2), 107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinfeld, R. (2021). The rise of political violence in the United States. Journal of Democracy, 32(4), 160–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, K. (2021, May 17). Parler returns to Apple App Store with some content excluded. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/17/22440005/parler-apple-app-store-return-amazon-google-capitol
   Google Scholar
• Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AOIR ethics working committee (version 2.0). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Massanari, A. L. (2018). Rethinking research ethics, power, and the risk of visibility in the era of the “alt-right” gaze. Social Media + Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastodon. (n.d.). Gab switches to Mastodon’s code: Our statement. https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2019/07/statement-on-gabs-fork-of-mastodon/
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. (2015). “Dude, where’s your face?” Self-presentation, self-description, and partner preferences on a social networking application for men who have sex with men: A content analysis. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 637–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9283-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C., Weir, D., Ring, S., Marsh, O., Inskip, C., & Priesto Chavana, N. (2023). Antisemitism on Twitter before and after Elon Musk’s acquisition. CASM Technology. https://files.casmtechnology.com/antisemitism-on-twitter-before-and-after-elon-musks-acquisition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mock, J. (2014, January 9). I’m a trans woman, but please stop asking me about my genitalia. ELLE. https://www.elle.com/life-love/society-career/transgender-women-body-image
   Google Scholar
• Mongie, L. (2016). Critical discourse analysis as queer linguistics: Religious pro- and anti-LGBT equality framing and counterframing in two letters to the editor in the city press. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 49. https://doi.org/10.5842/49-0-664
   Google Scholar
• Müller, K., & Schwarz, C. (2021). Fanning the flames of hate: Social media and hate crime. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(4), 2131–2167. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaa045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., & Angelique, H. (2017). Internalized homonegativity, confucianism, and self-esteem at the emergence of an LGBTQ identity in modern Vietnam. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(12), 1617–1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1345231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, Z. D. (2017). Is it Facebook official? Coming out and passing strategies of young adult gay men on social media. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1194112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmenter, J. G., Galliher, R. V., & Maughan, A. D. A. (2021). LGBTQ+ emerging adults perceptions of discrimination and exclusion within the LGBTQ+ community. Psychology and Sexuality, 12(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1716056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S. (2019). “Brown girls can’t be gay”: Racism experienced by queer South Asian women in the Toronto LGBTQ community. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 23(3), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2019.1585174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrey, T. G. (2020). Tabernacles of clay: Sexuality and gender in modern mormonism. University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469656229.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Pronger, B. (1999). Outta my endzone: Sport and the territorial anus. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 23(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723599234002
   Google Scholar
• Puwar, N. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Rambukkana, N. (2019). The politics of gray data: Digital methods, intimate proximity, and research ethics for work on the “alt-right.” Qualitative Inquiry, 25(3), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418806601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. W. (2006). Proving the case: Psychology, subjectivity, and representations of lesbian and gay parents in the media. In L. Castańeda & S. Campbell (Eds.), News and sexuality: Media portraits of diversity (pp. 235–256). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233062.n12
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. (2022, September 20). Texas has teed up a Supreme Court fight for the future of the internet. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/20/23360804/texas-fifth-circuit-ruling-hb20-supreme-court-speech-first-amendment-moderation
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. M., & Spivey, S. E. (2019). Ungodly genders: Deconstructing ex-gay movement discourses of “transgenderism” in the US. Social Sciences, 8(6), 191–219. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8060191
   Google Scholar
• Ronan, W. (2020, November 17). New FBI hate crimes report shows increases in anti-LGBTQ attacks. Human Rights Campaign. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/new-fbi-hate-crimes-report-shows-increases-in-anti-lgbtq-attacks
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. D., & McClelland, S. I. (2015). ‘Even though it’s a small checkbox, it’s a big deal’: Stresses and strains of managing sexual identity(s) on Facebook. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.994229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santinele Martino, A. (2017). Cripping sexualities: An analytic review of theoretical and empirical writing on the intersection of disabilities and sexualities. Sociology Compass, 11(5), e12471. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory & Society, 36(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn’t: How digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674240438
   Google Scholar
• Sloop, J. M. (2004). Disciplining gender: Rhetorics of sex identity in contemporary U.S. culture. University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snee, H., Hine, C., Morey, Y., Roberts, S., & Watson, H. (2016). Digital methods as mainstream methodology: An introduction. In H. Snee, C. Hine, Y. Morey, S. Roberts, & H. Watson (Eds.), Digital methods for social science (pp. 1–11). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Soral, W., Bilewicz, M., & Winiewski, M. (2018). Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desensitization. Aggressive Behavior, 44(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerton, C., Marshall, D., Aggleton, P., Rasmussen, M. L., & Cover, R. (2021). Restricted modes: Social media, content classification and LGBTQ sexual citizenship. New Media & Society, 23(5), 920–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820904362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. O. (2008). Social cognition and discourse processing goals in the analysis of “ex-gay” rhetoric. Discourse & Society, 19(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507083689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, A. L. (2018). Gender panics about transgender children in religious right discourse. Journal of LGBT Youth, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2017.1395305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suomela, T., Chee, F., Berendt, B., & Rockwell, G. (2019). Applying an ethics of care to internet research: Gamergate and digital humanities. Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.302
   Google Scholar
• Terry, J. (1999). An American obsession: Science, medicine, and the place of homosexuality in modern society. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226793689.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Topinka, R. (2018). Politically incorrect participatory media: Racist nationalism on r/ImGoingToHellForThis. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2050–2069. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torba, A. (2022a, January 13). Alt tech phonies: Gettr and rumble. Gab News. https://news.gab.com/2022/01/alt-tech-phonies-gettr-and-rumble/
   Google Scholar
• Torba, A. (2022b, April 26). Gab responds: Elon buys Twitter, now what? Gab News. https://news.gab.com/2022/04/gab-responds-elon-buys-twitter-now-what/
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., de Winkel, T., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem. New Media & Society, 146144482110456. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., & Aguaded, I. (2022). #Thisismechallenge and music for empowerment of marginalized groups on TikTok. Media and Communication, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P. (2020). Social media and moral panics: Assessing the effects of technological change on societal reaction. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920912257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherbed, J., & Roth, E. (2023, April 18). Twitter made it easier to harass transgender users. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/18/23688192/twitter-harrass-transgender-users-policy
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. (2011). Reflective paper: GL versus BT: The archaeology of biphobia and transphobia within the U.S. gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(4), 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2011.620848
   Google Scholar
• Wendling, M. (2018). Alt-right: From 4chan to the White House. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2015). Penis panics: Maleness, masculinity, and the matrix of sexual threat. In C. J. Pascoe & T. Bridges (Eds.), Exploring masculinities: Identity, inequality, continuity and change (pp. 382–393). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2019). Hatred behind the screens: A report on the rise of online hate speech. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/127085/1/Hate%20Behind%20the%20Screens.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse (2nd ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664
   Google Scholar
• Zannettou, S., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Kwak, H., Sirivianos, M., Stringini, G., & Blackburn, J. (2018). What is Gab: A bastion of free speech or an alt-right echo chamber. In WWW ’18: Companion proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (pp. 1007–1014). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191531
   Google Scholar