The Tridimensional Structure of Sociosexuality: Spanish Validation of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory

References

• Asendorpf, J. B., & Penke, L. ( 2005). A mature evolutionary psychology demands careful conclusions about sex differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 275–276. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05220058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. ( 2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banai, B., & Pavela, I. ( 2015). Two-dimensional structure of the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory and its personality correlates. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 1–7. doi:10.1177/1474704915604541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzo, J. P. ( 2013). Hookup sex versus romantic relationship sex in college: Why do we care and what do we do? Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 515–516. doi:10.1016/j.adohealth.2013.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. ( 2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. ( 2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. P. ( 2006). Are the correlates of sociosexuality different for men and women? Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1321–1327. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. M. ( 2013). Casual sex relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 138–150. doi:10.1177/2167696813487181
   Google Scholar
• Correa, A. B., Castro, A., Barrada, J. R., & Ruiz-Gómez, P. ( in press). Sociodemographic and psychosexual characteristics of students from a Spanish university who engage in casual sex. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. doi:10.1007/s13178-017-0274-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, M. E., Ackard, D. M., Resnick, M. D., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. ( 2009). Casual sex and psychological health among young adults. Is having “friends with benefits” emotionally damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41, 231–237. doi:10.1363/4123109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder, R. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. ( 2013). Are hookups replacing romantic relationships? A longitudinal study of first-year female college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 657–659. doi:10.1016/j.adohealth.2012.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. ( 2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. ( 1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., Fejfar, M. C., & Miller, J. D. ( 2000). Personality and sexual risk taking: A quantitative review. Journal of Personality, 68, 1203–1231. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. J., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. ( 2007). The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: Toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 382–391. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, K. S., Díaz-Morales, F., Vollmer, C., & Randler, C. ( 2014). Morningness-eveningness and sociosexuality: Evening females are less restricted than morning ones. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 13–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, S. J., Johnson, J. R., Adair, V., Rompa, D., Multhauf, K., & Kelly, J. A. ( 1994). Sexual sensation seeking: Scale development and predicting AIDS-risk behavior among homosexually active men. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 385–397. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6203_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandrik, M., Fincher, C. L., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. ( 2014). Men's but not women's sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 965–971. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0202-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. ( 1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Lippa, R. A. ( 2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9242-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesko, N., Láng, A., & Kocsor, F. ( 2014). The Hungarian version of Sociosexual Orientation Inventory Revised (SOI-R). Sex and age differences. Interpersona: An International Journal of Personal Relationships, 8, 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. ( 2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, F. ( 2016). Psychometric properties of a Portuguese version of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. Journal of Relationships Research, 7, e5, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. ( 2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. ( 2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penke, L. ( 2011). Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 431–435). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. ( 2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. ( 2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. ( 2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. ( 1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, W. E., & Papini, D. R. ( 1989). The Sexuality Scale (SS): An instrument to measure sexual-esteem, sexual-depression, and sexual-preoccupation. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 256–263. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224498909551510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler, F., Gómez-Lugo, M., Espada, J. P., Morales, A., Sierra, J. C., Marchal-Bertrand, L., & Vallejo-Medina, P. ( 2016). Adaptation and validation of the Brief Sexuality Scale in Colombian and Spanish populations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 16, 343–356.
   Google Scholar
• Teva, I., & Bermúdez, M. P. ( 2008). Adaptación castellana y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Búsqueda de Sensaciones Sexuales en adolescentes españoles [Psychometric properties of a Spanish adaptation of the Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale in Spanish adolescents]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 25, 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Voracek, M. ( 2005). Shortcomings of the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory: Can psychometrics inform evolutionary psychology? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 296–297. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05430058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrangalova, Z. ( 2015). Hooking up and psychological well-being in college students: Short-term prospective links across different hookup definitions. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 485–498. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.910745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrangalova, Z., & Ong, A. D. ( 2014). Who benefits from casual sex? The moderating role of sociosexuality. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 5, 883–891. doi:10.1177/1948550614537308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, G. D., & Bryan, A. ( 2007). Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: Why two factors are better than one. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 917–922. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinfurt, K. P., Lin, L., Bruner, D. W., Cyranowski, J. M., Dombeck, C. B., Hahn, E. A., … Flynn, K. E. ( 2015). Development and initial validation of the PROMIS® sexual function and satisfaction measures version 2.0. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 1961–1974. doi:10.1111/jsm.12966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelazniewicz, A. M., & Pawlowski, B. ( 2011). Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted vs. unrestricted). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1129–1135. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9850-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar