604
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The Dyadic Association among Technoference and Relationship and Sexual Satisfaction of Young Adult Couples

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., Preece, J. (2003). Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 185–211.
  • Belous, C. K. & Wampler, R. S. (2016). Development of the gay and lesbian relationship satisfaction scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42(3), 451–465.
  • Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 289–308.
  • Campbell, E. C. & Murray, C. E. (2015). Measuring the impact of technology on couple relationships: The development of the technology and intimate relationship assessment. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14(3), 254–276.
  • Canu, W. H., Tabor, L. S., Michael, K. D., Bazzini, D. G., & Elmore, A. L. (2014). Young adult romantic couples’ conflict resolution and satisfaction varies with partner’s attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder type. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 40(4), 509–524.
  • Carlson, R. G., Fripp, J., Cook, C., & Kelchner, V. (2015). Examining intimate partner violence, stress, and technology among young adults. The Professional Counselor, 5(3), 365–378.
  • Cooper, A., McLoughlin, I. P., & Campbell, K. M. (2000). Sexuality in cyberspace: Update for the 21st century. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(4), 521–536.
  • Coyne, S. M., Busby, D., Bushman, B. J., Gentile, D. A., Ridge, R., & Stockdale, L. (2012). Gaming in the game of love: Effects of video games on conflict in couples. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 61(3), 388–396.
  • Davis, M. H. & Oathout, H. A. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 397–410.
  • Eichenberg, C., Huss, J., & Küsel, C. (2017). From online dating to online divorce: An overview of couple and family relationships shaped through digital media. Contemporary Family Therapy: An international journal, 39(4), 249–260.
  • Flora, J. & Segrin, C. (2000). Relationship development in dating couples: Implications for relationship satisfaction and loneliness. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 17(6), 811–826.
  • Fuller, K. A. & Rutter, P. A. (2018). Perceptions of parental acceptance or rejection: How does it impact LGB adult relationship quality and satisfaction. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14(4), 327–336.
  • Galovan, A. M., Drouin, M., & McDaniel, B. T. (2018). Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 19–29.
  • Gangamma, R., Bartle-Haring, S., Holowacz, E., Hartwell, E. E., & Glebova, T. (2015). Relational ethics, depressive symptoms, and relationship satisfaction in couples in therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(3), 354–366.
  • Gergen, K. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hawkins, B. P. & Hertlein, K. M. (2013). Treatment strategies for online role-playing gaming problems in couples. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(2), 150–167.
  • Heppner, P. P., Wampold, B. E., Owen, J., Thompson, M. N., & Wang, K. T. (2016). Research design in counseling (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  • Hertlein, K. M. (2010). The integration of technology into sex therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 21(2), 117–131.
  • Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61(3), 374–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00702.x
  • Hertlein, K. M. & Ancheta, K. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of technology in relationships: Findings from an open-ended survey. The Qualitative Report, 19(11), 1–11.
  • Hertlein, K. M. & Twist, M. L. C. (2017). Sexting behavior among college students: Implications for college clinicians. Journal of College Student Psychopathy, 31(3), 215–230.
  • Hertlein, K. M. & Webster, M. (2008). Technology, relationships, and problems: A research synthesis. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 34(4), 445–460.
  • Hipp, C. J. & Carlson, R. G. (2019). Comfort in treating sexual problems: Current training and counselor self-efficacy. Family Journal, 27(2), 105–114.
  • IBM Corp. Released. (2017). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 25.0. IBM Corp.
  • Johnson, M. D., Nguyen, L., Anderson, J. R., Liu, W., & Vennum, A. (2015). Pathways to romantic relationship success among Chinese young adult couples: Contributions of family dysfunction, mental health problems, and negative couple interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(1), 5–23.
  • Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155.
  • Kelley, H. H. & Thibaut, J. E. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Krumholtz, S., Moss, A. J., & Litman, L. (2018, November 8). Running dyadic studies on Mechanical Turk using TurkPrime [blog post]. Retrieved from https://blog.turkprime.com/running-dyadic-studies-on-mechanical-turk-using-turkprime
  • Lawrance, K. & Byers, E. S. (1992). Development of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 1, 123–128.
  • Lawrance, K. & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2(4), 267–285.
  • Lenhart, A. & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the internet, and social media. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
  • Maxwell, J. A., Muise, A., MacDonald, G., Day, L. C., Rosen, N. O., & Impett, E. A. (2017). How implicit theories of sexuality shape sexual and relationship well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 238–279.
  • McArthur, N. & Twist, M. L. C. (2017). The rise of digisexuality: Therapeutic challenges and possibilities. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 32(3–4), 334–344.
  • McDaniel, B. T. & Coyne, S. M. (2016a). ‘Technoference’: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98.
  • McDaniel, B. T. & Coyne, S. M. (2016b). Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting. Social Science Journal, 53(4), 435–443.
  • McDaniel, B. T. & Drouin, M. (2015). Sexting among married couples: Who is doing it, and are they more satisfied? CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 18(11), 628–634.
  • McDaniel, B. T., Galovan, A. M., Cravens, J. D., & Drouin, M. (2018). ‘Technoference’ and implications for mothers’ and fathers’ couple and coparenting relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 303–313.
  • Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). The effects of cell phone usage rules on satisfaction in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 17–34.
  • Morgan, P., Hubler, D. S., Payne, P. B., Pomeroy, C., Gregg, D., & Homer, M. (2017). My partner’s media use: A qualitative study exploring perceptions of problems with a partner’s media use. Marriage & Family Review, 53(7), 683–695.
  • Murray, C. E. & Campbell, E. C. (2015). The pleasures and perils of technology in intimate relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14(2), 116–140.
  • Nakonezny, P. A. & Denton, W. A. (2008). Marital relationships: A social exchange theory perspective. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(5), 402–412.
  • Newman, D. A. (2010). Book review: Newman [Review of the book Dyadic data analysis, by D. A. Kenny, D. A. Kashy, & W. L. Cook]. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 603–607.
  • Norton, A. M., Baptist, J., & Hogan, B. (2018). Computer-mediated communication in intimate relationships: Associations of boundary crossing, intrusion, relationship satisfaction, and partner responsiveness. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 44(1), 165–182.
  • Parker, T. S., Blackburn, K. M., Perry, M. S., & Hawks, J. M. (2013). Sexting as an intervention: Relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 1–12.
  • Pew Research Center. (2018). Millennials stand out for their technology use, but older generations also embrace digital life. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/05/02/millennials-stand-out-for-their-technology-use-but-older-generations-also-embrace-digital-life/
  • Przybylski, A. K. & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2017). HLM 7.03 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Rehman, U. S., Woody, E. Z., & Purdon, C. (2016). The longitudinal association of relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(7), 822–831.
  • Sabatelli, R. M. (1988). Exploring relationship satisfaction: A social exchange perspective on the interdependence between theory, research, and practice. Family Relations, 37, 217–222.
  • Sabatelli, R. M. & Pearce, J. T. (1986). Exploring marital expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3(3), 307–321.
  • Schade, L. C., Sandburg, J., Bean, R., Busby, D., & Coyne, S. (2013). Using technology to connect in romantic relationships: Effects on attachment, relationship satisfaction, and stability in emerging adults. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(4), 314–338.
  • Seifert, K., Boulas, J., Huss, M. T., Scalora, M. J. (2017). Response bias on self-report measures sexual fantasies among sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 61(3), 269–281.
  • Sheehan, K. B. (2018). Crowdsourcing research: Data collection with Amazon’s mechanical turk. Communication monographs, 85(1), 140–156.
  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage & Family, 38(1), 15–28.
  • Sprecher, S. (2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage & Family, 63(3), 599–613.
  • Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39(3), 190–196.
  • Stephenson, K. R. & Meston, C. M. (2011). The association between sexual costs and sexual satisfaction in women: An exploration of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(1–2), 31–40.
  • Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Trub, L., Powell, J., Biscardi, K., & Rosenthal, L. (2018). The “good enough” parent: Perfectionism and relationship satisfaction among parents and nonparents. Journal of Family Issues, 39(10), 2862–2882.
  • Whitton, S. W., Weitbrecht, E. M., Kuryluk, A. D., & Hutsell, D. W. (2016). A randomized waitlist-controlled trial of culturally sensitive relationship education for male same-sex couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(6), 763–768.
  • Wong, J. S. (2017). Competing desires: How young adult couples negotiate moving for career opportunities. Gender & Society, 31(2), 171–196.
  • Zapien, N. (2017). Participation bias and social desirability effects in research on extramarital affairs: Considerations of meaning and implications for sexual behavior research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1565–1571.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.