REFERENCES
- Bain, R. B. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108, 2080–2114. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
- Bain, R. B., & Mirel, J. (2006). Setting up camp at the great instructional divide: Educating beginning history teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 212–219. doi:10.1177/0022487105285892
- Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497–511. doi:10.1177/0022487109348479
- Barton, K. C. (1997). “I just kinda know”: Elementary students’ ideas about historical evidence. Theory & Research in Social Education, 25, 407–430. doi:10.1080/00933104.1997.10505821
- Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Brophy, J., & VanSledright, B. (1997). Teaching and learning history in elementary schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Calder, L. (2006). Uncoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. The Journal of American History, 92, 1358–1370. doi:10.2307/4485896
- Carretero, M., Jacott, L., Limon, M., Lopez-Manjon, A., & Leon, J. A. (1994). Historical knowledge: Cognitive and instructional implications. In M. Carretero & J. Voss ( Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences ( pp. 357–376). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17, 373–386. doi:10.1080/0144341970170401
- Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (2001). Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 139–156. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
- Drake, F. D. & Nelson, L. R. (2009). Engagement in teaching history: Theory and practices for middle and secondary teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
- Evans, R. (1994). Educational ideologies and the teaching of history. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Stainton ( Eds.), Teaching and learning in history ( pp. 171–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Grant, S. G. (2006). Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Grant, S. G., & Gradwell, J. M. ( Eds.). (2010). Teaching history with big ideas: Cases of ambitious teachers. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, 2055–2100. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
- Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re‐imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15, 273–289. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340
- Harris, L. M., & Bain, R. B. (2011). Pedagogical content knowledge for world history teachers: Bridging the gap between knowing and teaching. American Educator, 35(2), 13–16. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org
- Hartzler-Miller, C. (2001). Making sense of “best practices” in teaching history. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29, 672–695. doi:10.1080/00933104.2001.10505961
- Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Holt, T. (1990). Thinking historically: Narrative, imagination, and understanding. New York, NY: College Board.
- Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). Minimizing non-response in the Delphi process: How to respond to non-response. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 12(17), 1–6. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net
- Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. In Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 11–29). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/documents/Kazemi.pdf
- Lee, P. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In M. S. Donovan ( Ed.), How students learn: History in the classroom ( pp. 31–79). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students age 7–14. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg ( Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history. National and international perspectives ( pp. 199–222). New York: New York University Press.
- Leinhardt, G. (1997). Instructional explanations in history. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 221–232. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89730-3
- Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2005). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Martorella, P. H. (1991). Consensus building among social educators: A Delphi study. Theory & Research in Social Education, 19, 83–94. doi:10.1080/00933104.1991.10505629
- McCarthy-Young, K. & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from primary documents: A way of knowing history. Written Communication, 15, 25–68. doi:10.1177/0741088398015001002
- McDiarmid, G. W. (1994). Understanding history for teaching: A study of the historical understanding of prospective teachers. In M. Carretero & J. Voss ( Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences ( pp. 357–376). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Monte-Sano, C. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension and summary: Learning to read and write in history by focusing on evidence, perspective, and interpretation. Curriculum Inquiry, 41, 212–249. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00547.x
- Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104, 280–312. doi:10.2307/1085433
- Nokes, J. D. (2010). Observing literacy practices in history classrooms. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38, 515–544. doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473438
- Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105
- Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 86–112. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
- Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of domain expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85–106. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3
- Sandholtz, J., Ogawa, R., & Scribner, S. (2004). Standards gaps: Unintended consequences of local standards-based reform. Teachers College Record, 106, 1177–1202. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
- Saye, J. W., & the Social Studies Inquiry Research Collaborative (SSIRC). (2013). Authentic pedagogy: Its presence in social studies classrooms and relationships to student performance on state-mandated tests. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41, 89–132. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.756785
- Seixas, P. (1993). Historical understanding among adolescents in a multicultural setting. Curriculum Inquiry, 23, 301–327. doi:10.2307/1179994
- Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2012). The big 6: Historical thinking concepts. Toronto, ON, Canada: Nelson.
- Seixas, P., & Peck, C. L. (2004). Teaching historical thinking. In A. Sears & I. Wright ( Eds.), Challenges and prospects for Canadian social studies ( pp. 109–117). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Pacific Educational.
- Shemilt, D. (2000). The Caliph’s coin: The currency of narrative frameworks in history teaching. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 199–222). New York: New York University Press.
- Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430–456. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.4.5
- Stearns, P. (2000). Getting specific about training in historical analysis: A case study in world history. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & Wineburg, S. ( Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives ( pp. 419–436). New York: New York University Press.
- Uhl, N. P.(1983). Using the Delphi technique in institutional planning. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1983(37), 81–94. doi:10.1002/ir.37019833709
- Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 87–110. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
- van Hover, S., Hicks, D., & Cotton, S. (2012). “Can you make “historiography” sound more friendly?”: Towards the construction of a reliable and validated history teaching observation instrument. The History Teacher, 45, 603–612. Retrieved from http://www.thehistoryteacher.org
- VanSledright, B. (2011). The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Van Tulder, M., Veenman, S., & Sieben, J. (1988). Features of effective in‐service activities: Results of a Delphi‐study. Educational Studies, 14, 209–223. doi:10.1080/0305569880140207
- Volk, K. (1993). Curriculum development using the Delphi technique. Technology Teacher, 52(4), 35–36. Retrieved from http://www.iteea.org
- Voss, J. F., Wiley, J., & Kennet, J. (1999). Student perceptions of history and historical concepts. In M. Carretero & J. Voss ( Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history ( pp. 307–330). London, England: Woburn.
- Wills, J. (2007). Putting the squeeze on social studies: Managing teaching dilemmas in subject areas excluded from state testing. Teachers College Record, 109, 1980–2046. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
- Wilson, S. (2001). Research on history teaching. In V. Richardson ( Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching ( pp. 527–544). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Wilson, S., & Wineburg, S. (1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance assessments to understand the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 729–769. doi:10.3102/00028312030004729
- Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027
- Wineburg, S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495–519. doi:10.3102/00028312028003495
- Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Yeager, E. A., & Davis, O. L. (1995). Between campus and classroom: Secondary student-teachers’ thinking about historical texts. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29(1), 1–8.
- Yeager, E. A., & Davis, O. L. (2005). Wise social studies teaching in an age of high-stakes testing: Essays on classroom practices and possibilities. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.