1,926
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

Conceptualizing Emotions in Social Studies Education

, &

REFERENCES

  • References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the review of research.
  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. New York, NY: Routeledge.
  • Barchuk, Z., & Harkins, M. (2010). Why teach about globalization? Social Studies Research & Practice, 5(1), 13–23. Retrieved from http://www.socstrp.org
  • *Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. (2003). Why don’t more teachers engage students in interpretation? Social Education, 67, 358–361.
  • Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Barton, K. C., & McCully, A. W. (2007). Teaching controversial issues … where controversial issues really matter. Teaching History, 127, 13–19. Retrieved from http://www.history.org.uk/
  • Barton, K. C., & McCully, A. W. (2012). Trying to “see things differently”: Northern Ireland students’ struggle to understand alternative historical perspectives. Theory & Research in Social Education,40, 371–408. doi:10.1080/00933104.2012.710928
  • Baum, R. (1996). “What I have learned to feel”: The pedagogical emotions of Holocaust education. College Literature, 23(3), 44–57. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org
  • Bekerman, Z., & Zembylas, M. (2011). The emotional complexities of teaching conflictual historical narratives: The case of integrated Palestinian-Jewish schools in Israel. Teachers College Record, 113, 1004–1030. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
  • *Belitto, C. M. (1996). Incomplete picture: Religion in high school textbooks on European history. The Social Studies, 87, 274–280.
  • Berry, C., Schmied, L. A., & Schrock, J. (2008). The role of emotion in teaching and learning history: A scholarship of teaching exploration. The History Teacher, 41, 437–452. Retrieved from http://wwwthehistoryteacher.org
  • *Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2008). Weathering natural disasters with a net of safety. Social Education, 72(1), 27–30.
  • *Berson, M. (2002). A counter-response to terrorism: The hope and promise of our nation’s youth. Theory & Research in Social Education, 30, 142–144.
  • Blake, C. (1998). Historical empathy: A response to Foster and Yeager. International Journal of Social Education, 13(1), 25–31. Retrieved from http://ijse.iweb.bsu.edu
  • Blutinger, J. C. (2009). Bearing witness: Teaching the Holocaust from a victim-centered perspective. The History Teacher, 42, 269–279. Retrieved from http://wwwthehistoryteacher.org
  • Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York, NY: Routeledge.
  • *Brandhorst, A. R. (2004). Identity-centered conflicts, authority, and dogmatism: Challenges for the design of social studies curriculum. Theory & Research in Social Education, 32, 10–23.
  • Britzman, D. P. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects: Toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Brooks, S. (2011). Historical empathy as perspective recognition and care in one secondary social studies classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education,39, 166–202. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473452
  • Brown, J. G. (2007). Teaching about genocide in a new millennium. Social Education, 71(1), 21–23. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org
  • *Camicia, S. (2008). Deciding what is a controversial issue: A case study of social studies curriculum controversy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 36, 298–316.
  • Carter, C. (2004). Education for peace in Northern Ireland and the USA. Theory & Research in Social Education,32, 24–38. doi:10.1080/00933104.2004.10473241
  • Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Endacott, J. L. (2010). Reconsidering affective engagement in historical empathy. Theory & Research in Social Education,38, 6–47. doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473415
  • Epstein, T. (1998). Deconstructing differences in African-American and European-American adolescents’ perspectives on U. S. history. Curriculum Inquiry, 28, 397–423. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
  • Epstein, T. (2000). Adolescents’ perspectives on racial diversity in U.S. history: Case studies from an urban classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 185–214. Retrieved from http://aer.sagepub.com/
  • Epstein, T. (2001). Racial identity and young people’s perspectives on social education. Theory into Practice, 40(1), 42–47. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/
  • Epstein, T. (2009). Interpreting national history: Race, identity, and pedagogy in classrooms and communities. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Epstein, T., & Shiller, J. (2005). Perspective matters: Social identity and the teaching and learning of national history. Social Education, 69, 201. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/
  • Evans, R., Avery, P. G., & Pederson, P. V. (1999). Taboo topics: Cultural restraint on teaching social issues. The Social Studies,90, 218–224. doi:10.1080/00377999909602419
  • Faulconer, T., & Freeman, A. (2005). Teachers, classroom controversy, and the media. Social Education, 69, 323–327. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/
  • Foster, S. (1999). Using historical empathy to excite students about the study of history: Can you empathize with Neville Chamberlain? The Social Studies,90(1), 18–24. doi:10.1080/00377999909602386
  • Foster, S. J. (2001). Historical empathy in theory and practice: Some final thoughts. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 167–181). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Garrett, H. J. (2011). The routing and re-routing of difficult knowledge: Social studies teachers encounter When the Levees Broke. Theory & Research in Social Education,39, 320–347. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473458
  • Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Grosland, T. J. (2013). An examination of the role of emotions in antiracist pedagogy: Implications, scholarship, and practices. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies,35, 319–332. doi:10.1080/10714413.2013.819722
  • Helmsing, M. (2014). Virtuous subjects: A critical analysis of the affective substance of social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education,42, 127–140. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.842530
  • Hess, D. (2005). How do teachers’ political views influence teaching about controversial issues? Social Education, 69(1), 47–48. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/
  • Horton, P. (2000). A model for teaching secondary history: The case of Fort Pillow. The History Teacher, 33(2), 175–183. Retrieved from http://www.thehistoryteacher.org/
  • Hunt, M. P., & Metcalf, L. E. (1955). Teaching high school social studies: Problems in reflective thinking and social understanding. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • James, J. H. (2009). Reframing the disclosure debate: Confronting issues of transparency in teaching controversial content. Social Studies Research & Practice, 4(1), 82–94. Retrieved from http://www.socstrp.org
  • James, J. H. (2010). “Democracy is the devil’s snare”: Theological certainty in teacher education. Theory & Research in Social Education,38, 618–639. doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473441
  • Joseph, B. (2008). Why are your students sleeping through the French Revolution? The Social Studies,99, 161–164. doi:10.3200/TSSS.99.4.161-164
  • Kohlmeier, J. (2006). “Couldn’t she just leave?”: The relationship between consistently using class discussions and the development of historical empathy in a 9th grade world history course. Theory & Research in Social Education,34, 34–57. doi:10.1080/00933104.2006.10473297
  • Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2001). Empathy, perspective taking, and rational understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 21–50). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • *Lemisko, L. (2010). The inside, out: Diaries as entry points to historical perspective-taking. Canadian Social Studies, 44(1), 38–54.
  • Lévesque, S. (2003). “Bin Laden is responsible; it was shown on tape”: Canadian high school students’ historical understanding of terrorism. Theory & Research in Social Education,31, 174–202. doi:10.1080/00933104.2003.10473221
  • Levstik, L. S. (2001). Crossing the empty space: Perspective taking in New Zealand adolescents’ understanding of national history. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 69–96). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • *Lindquist, D. H. (2007). “Denmark 1943”: Using music to teach Holocaust rescue. Social Education, 71, 316–321.
  • Lindquist, D. H. (2010). Complicating issues in Holocaust education. Journal of Social Studies Research, 34(1), 77–93. Retrieved from http://www.thejssr.com/
  • Liston, D., & Garrison, J. Eds. (2004) Teaching, learning, and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice. New York, NY: RouteledgeFalmer.
  • McCrary, N. (2002). Investigating the use of narrative in affective learning on issues of social justice. Theory & Research in Social Education,30, 255–273. doi:10.1080/00933104.2002.10473194
  • *Mock, K. M. (1996). Presenting the “other side.” Focus on human rights. Canadian Social Studies, 30, 159–160.
  • Patterson, N. C. (2010). What’s stopping you? Classroom censorship for better or worse. Social Education, 74, 326–331. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/
  • Reidel, M., & Salinas, C. (2011). The role of emotion in democratic dialogue: A self study. Social Studies Research & Practice, 6(1), 2–20. Retrieved from http://www.socstrp.org
  • Richardson, G. (1997). The love that dare not speak its name: Nationalism and identity in the Alberta social studies 10 curriculum. Canadian Social Studies, 31, 138–141. Retrieved from http://www.educ.ualberta.ca/
  • Rubin, C., & Hayes, B. (2010). “No backpacks” versus “drugs and murder”: The promise and complexity of youth civic action research. Harvard Educational Review, 80, 213–221. Retrieved from http://hepg.org/
  • *Sanchez, R. M. (2007). Music and poetry as social justice texts in the secondary classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35, 646–666.
  • Schul, J. E. (2011). In another American skin: Development of empathy through desktop documentary making. Social Studies Research & Practice, 6(3), 105–120. Retrieved from http://www.socstrp.org
  • Thomas-Brown, K. (2010). Using “When the Levees Broke/Teaching the Levees” to teach middle school students about empathy and social justice. Social Studies Research & Practice, 5(2), 76–90. Retrieved from http://www.socstrp.org
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2001). From empathetic regard to self-understanding: Im/positionality, empathy, and historical contextualization. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 51–68). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Wang, H. (2008). “Red eyes”: Engaging emotions in multicultural education. Multicultural Perspectives,10(1), 10–16. doi:10.1080/15210960701869330
  • Washington, E. Y., & Humphries, E. K. (2011). A social studies teacher’s sense making of controversial issues discussions of race in a predominantly white, rural high school classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education,39, 92–114. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473448
  • Waterson, R. A. (2009). The examination of pedagogical approaches to teaching controversial public issues: Explicitly teaching the Holocaust and comparative genocide. Social Studies Research & Practice, 4(2), 1–23. Retrieved from http://www.socstrp.org
  • Zembylas, M. (2007). Theory and methodology in researching emotions in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education,30(1), 57–72. doi:10.1080/17437270701207785
  • Zembylas, M., & Bekerman, Z. (2008). Education and the dangerous memories of historical trauma: Narratives of pain, narratives of hope. Curriculum Inquiry,38, 125–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00403.x
  • Zembylas, M., & Kambani, F. (2012). The teaching of controversial issues during elementary-level history instruction: Greek-cypriot teachers’ perceptions and emotions. Theory & Research in Social Education,40, 107–133. doi:10.1080/00933104.2012.670591

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.